The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 95–116 | Cite as

Local labor markets in U.S.–Mexican border cities and the impact of maquiladora production

  • André Varella Mollick
  • Abigaíl Cortez-Rayas
  • Rosa A. Olivas-Moncisvais
Original Paper

Abstract

Shift-share decompositions of employment positions created over 1990–2002 at U.S.–Mexico border cities show that El Paso employment change has been overwhelmingly attributed to national forces, while local and national forces roughly match employment creation at Brownsville. With such fast growing U.S.–Mexico border area as background, we implement time series labor demand models to these cities (El Paso and Brownsville) and compare movements in Mexican maquiladora production against U.S. employment and wages. Cointegration methods confirm that local shocks are more important in Brownsville than in El Paso. Specifically, 10% increases in Juárez maquiladora production lead to increases of 1.21% in El Paso’s government employment and of 0.88% in overall employment. Similar increases in Matamoros lead to gains of 1.59% in Brownsville’s trade, transportation and utilities employment and of 1.41% in overall employment. These results support shift-share findings and are generally consistent with a more diversified industry-mix promoting higher employment creation.

JEL Classification

R11 F16 

References

  1. Altonji J, Ham J (1990) Variation in employment growth in Canada: the role of external, national, regional, and industrial factors. J Labor Econ 8(1)Part 2:S196–S236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya R (2003) Sources of variation in regional economies. Ann Reg Sci 37:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard O, Katz L (1992) Regional evolutions. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1:1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown S, Coulson E, Engle R (1990) Noncointegration econometric evaluation of models of regional shift and share. NBER Working Paper 3291Google Scholar
  5. Brownsville Economic Development Council (2004) Major industries. Brownsville OverviewGoogle Scholar
  6. Cañas J (2002) A decade of change: El Paso’s economic transition of the 1990s. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, El Paso Business Frontier 1Google Scholar
  7. Chang-Hee C (2003) Tijuana-San Diego: globalization and the transborder metropolis. Ann Reg Sci 37:463–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coulson N (1999) Sectoral sources of metropolitan growth. Reg Sci Urban Econ 29:723–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dávila A, Pagán J, Soydemir G (2002) The short-term and long-term deterrence effects of INS border and interior enforcement on undocumented immigration. J Econ Behav Organ 49:459–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fullerton T, Schauer D (2001) Short-run Maquiladora employment dynamics. Int Adv Econ Res 7:471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GAO (2003) Mexico’s Maquiladora decline affects U.S. Mexico border communities and trade. United States General Accounting OfficeGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruben W (2001) Was NAFTA behind Mexico’s high Maquiladora growth? Econ Financ Rev FRB of Dallas, Third Quarter:11–21Google Scholar
  13. Hamermesh D (1993) Labor demand. Princeton University Press, Princeton New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanson G (1996) U.S.–Mexico integration and regional economies: evidence from border-city pairs. (January). NBER Working Paper 5425Google Scholar
  15. Hanson G (2002) The role of Maquiladoras in Mexico’s export boom. University of California-San Diego, manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kose M, Meredith G, Towe C (2004) How has NAFTA Affected the Mexican economy? Review and evidence. (April). IMF Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  18. McCarthy J, Steindel C (1997) National and regional factors in the New York metropolitan economy. FRBNY Economic Policy Review February:5–19Google Scholar
  19. Mollick A (2003) Employment determination at Mexican Maquiladoras: does location matter? J Borderl Stud 18(2):45–67Google Scholar
  20. Orrenius P, Berman A (2002) Growth on the border or bordering on growth. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Southwest Economy 3, May/June:1–8Google Scholar
  21. Robertson R (2000) Wage shocks and North-American labour-market integration. Am Econ Rev 90(4):742–764Google Scholar
  22. Robertson R (2003) Exchange rates and relative wages: evidence from Mexico. N Am J Econ Finance 14:25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Texas Workforce Commission (2003) Texas labor market review. Labor Market Information Department, AprilGoogle Scholar
  24. Vargas L (2001) Maquiladoras: impact on Texas border cities. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, June:25–29Google Scholar
  25. Zamora F, Lecuanda JM (2002) Interdependencia comercial de Tijuana y San Diego. Comer Exter 52(8):680–686Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Varella Mollick
    • 1
  • Abigaíl Cortez-Rayas
    • 2
  • Rosa A. Olivas-Moncisvais
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Texas—Pan AmericanEdinburgUSA
  2. 2.ITESM-Campus Monterrey-EGADESan Pedro Garza GarciaMexico
  3. 3.ITESM-Campus Monterrey-EGAPMonterreyMexico

Personalised recommendations