Advertisement

Selective bundle tensioning in double-bundle MPFL reconstruction to improve restoration of dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure

  • N. ZumbansenEmail author
  • A. Haupert
  • D. Kohn
  • O. Lorbach
KNEE
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the optimal graft tension angles in a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with selective bundle tensioning in order to restore patellofemoral contact pressure distributions closest to the native state.

Methods

Twelve human cadaveric knee specimens were mounted with the femur on a custom-made fixation device allowing free range of motion in the knee joint for testing. Using a sensitive pressure film (Tekscan) patellofemoral contact pressure was measured in 15° intervals during a dynamic flexion movement from 0°–90° in the native state, in cut MPFL and after MPFL-reconstruction with a gracilis tendon.

The graft was separated in two bundles and was fixed independently on the patella using two knotless anchors. Two groups were made with either the proximal or distal bundle fixed at the femur at a knee flexion angle of 30° and the corresponding other bundle subsequently fixed at the femur at 15°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion using extra-cortical fixation and controlled tension of 2N in both groups. The sequence of the flexion angles at the graft fixation was alternated. Pressure measurements were repeated after every fixation of the graft.

Results

Cutting the MPFL resulted in significantly reduced patellofemoral contact pressure at all flexion angles. After MPFL reconstruction the patellofemoral contact pressure remained significantly reduced during dynamic knee flexion in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) except for fixation of the proximal bundle in 30° and the distal bundle in 75°. Selective evaluation of lateral patellofemoral contact pressure, however, showed significant reduction in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) from 15° to 90°. Evaluation of isolated medial patellofemoral pressure changes showed no significant difference in all tested combinations compared to the intact knee. Furthermore, evaluation of the isolated proximal and distal patellofemoral contact pressure also revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure in all tested double-bundle combinations (p < 0.05) except for fixation of the proximal bundle in 30° and the distal bundle in 75°.

Conclusion

According to this study, selective bundle tensioning in anatomic MPFL-reconstruction should be considered as an easy and more anatomic alternative to current popular techniques to restore patella kinematics and give clear recommendation about knee flexion angle and tension during fixation. Although tensioning two bundles separately may further improve clinical results. If performed, fixation of the graft is recommended under low tension (2N) with the proximal bundle at 30° and the distal bundle at 75° of knee flexion.

Keywords

MPFL Double-bundle Patellofemoral Knee kinematics Biomechanical Patella 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No special funding as the study was supported by Saarland University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kirrberger Straße, Geb. 37, D-66421 Homburg (Saar), Germany.

Ethical approval

In Germany is no need for a specific consent of the ethic committee for biomechanical study. Therefore, only approval from the university board was obtained.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad CS, Brown GD, Stein BS (2009) The docking technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 37:2021–2027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albee FH (1915) The bone graft wedge in the treatment of habitual dislocation of the patella. Med Record 1915:257–259Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amis AA, Firer P, Mountney J, Senavongse W, Thomas NP (2003) Anatomy and biomechanics of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee 10:215–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beck P, Brown NAT, Greis PE, Burks RT (2007) Patellofemoral contact pressures and lateral patellar translation after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:1557–1563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berruto M, Ferrua P, Uboldi F, Usellini E, Gala L, Tassi A, Marelli B (2014) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with bioactive synthetic ligament is an option. A 3-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2419–2425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chouteau J (2016) Surgical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:S189–S194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deie M, Ochi M, Adachi N, Shibuya H, Nakamae A (2011) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction fixed with a cylindrical bone plug and a grafted semitendinosus tendon at the original femoral site for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 39:140–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Desio SM, Burks RT, Bachus KN (1998) Soft tissue restraints to lateral patellar translation in the human knee. Am J Sports Med 26:59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drez D, Edwards TB, Williams CS (2001) Results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in the treatment of patellar dislocation. Arthroscopy 17:298–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ (2006) Technical errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage: a computational analysis. Am J Sports Med 34:1478–1485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghosh KM, Merican AM, Iranpour-Boroujeni F, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2009) Length change patterns of the extensor retinaculum and the effect of total knee replacement. J Orthop Res 27:865–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Han H, Xia Y, Yun X, Wu M (2011) Anatomical transverse patella double tunnel reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament with a hamstring tendon autograft for recurrent patellar dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:343–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hautamaa PV, Fithian DC, Kaufman KR, Daniel DM, Pohlmeyer AM (1998) Medial soft tissue restraints in lateral patellar instability and repair. Clin Orthop Relat Ses 1998:174–182Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kang HJ, Cao JH, Pan S, Wang XJ, Yu DH, Zheng ZM (2014) The horizontal Y-shaped graft with respective graft tension angles in anatomical two-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2445–2451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kang HJ, Wang F, Chen BC, Su YL, Zhang ZC, Yan CB (2010) Functional bundles of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1511–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kita K, Horibe S, Toritsuka Y, Nakamura N, Tanaka Y, Yonetani Y, Mae T, Nakata K, Yoshikawa H, Shino K (2012) Effects of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction on patellar tracking. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:829–837PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lenschow S, Schliemann B, Gestring J, Herbort M, Schulze M, Kösters C (2013) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: fixation strength of 5 different techniques for graft fixation at the patella. Arthroscopy 29:766–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lippacher S, Dreyhaupt J, Williams SRM, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2014) Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: clinical outcomes and return to sports. Am J Sports Med 42:1661–1668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lorbach O, Haupert A, Efe T, Pizanis A, Weyers I, Kohn D, Kieb M (2017) Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2502–2510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lorbach O, Zumbansen N, Kieb M, Efe T, Pizanis A, Kohn D, Haupert A (2018) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: impact of knee flexion angle during graft fixation on dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure—a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 34:1072–1082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matic GT, Magnussen RA, Kolovich GP, Flanigan DC (2014) Return to activity after medial patellofemoral ligament repair or reconstruction. Arthroscopy 30:1018–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matthews JJ, Schranz P (2010) Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using a longitudinal patellar tunnel technique. Int Orthop 34:1321–1325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mountney J, Senavongse W, Amis AA, Thomas NP (2005) Tensile strength of the medial patellofemoral ligament before and after repair or reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:36–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nomura E, Horiuchi Y, Kihara M (2000) Medial patellofemoral ligament restraint in lateral patellar translation and reconstruction. Knee 7:121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nomura E, Inoue M (2003) Surgical technique and rationale for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Arthroscopy 19:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ostermeier S, Holst M, Bohnsack M, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth C-J (2007) Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral contact pressure following reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: an in vitro study. Clin Biomech 22:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Panni AS, Alam M, Cerciello S, Vasso M, Maffulli N (2011) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with a divergent patellar transverse 2-tunnel technique. Am J Sports Med 39:2647–2655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Papannagari R, Gill TJ, DeFrate LE, Moses JM, Petruska AJ, Li G (2006) In vivo kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and functional evaluation. Am J Sports Med 34:2006–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parikh SN, Nathan ST, Wall EJ, Eismann EA (2013) Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in young patients. Am J Sports Med 41:1030–1038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schöttle PB, Hensler D, Imhoff AB (2010) Anatomical double-bundle MPFL reconstruction with an aperture fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:147–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schöttle PB, Schmeling A, Rosenstiel N, Weiler A (2007) Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:801–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shah JN, Howard JS, Flanigan DC, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Lattermann C (2012) A systematic review of complications and failures associated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 40:1916–1923PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Singhal R, Rogers S, Charalambous CP (2013) Double-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft and mediolateral patellar tunnel fixation: a meta-analysis of outcomes and complications. Bone Joint J 95-B:900–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smirk C, Morris H (2003) The anatomy and reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee 10:221–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith TO, Mann CJV, Donell ST (2014) Does knee joint proprioception alter following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction? Knee 21:21–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Song SY, Pang C-H, Kim CH, Kim J, Choi ML, Seo Y-J (2015) Length change behavior of virtual medial patellofemoral ligament fibers during in vivo knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 43:1165–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stephen JM, Kader D, Lumpaopong P, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2013) Sectioning the medial patellofemoral ligament alters patellofemoral joint kinematics and contact mechanics: transection of the MPF. J Orthop Res 31:1423–1429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stephen JM, Kittl C, Williams A, Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Fink C, Amis AA (2016) Effect of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction method on patellofemoral contact pressures and kinematics. Am J Sports Med 44:1186–1194PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stephen JM, Lumpaopong P, Deehan DJ, Kader D, Amis AA (2012) The medial patellofemoral ligament: location of femoral attachment and length change patterns resulting from anatomic and nonanatomic attachments. Am J Sports Med 40:1871–1879PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tscholl PM, Ernstbrunner L, Pedrazzoli L, Fucentese SF (2018) The relationship of femoral tunnel positioning in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction on clinical outcome and postoperative complications. Arthroscopy 34:2410–2416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang C, Ma L, Zhou J, Ji G, Wang H, Wang F, Wang J (2013) Double-bundle anatomical versus single-bundle isometric medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar dislocation. Int Orthop 37:617–624PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Witoński D, Kęska R, Synder M, Sibiński M (2013) An isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. BioMed Res Int 2013:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wylie JD, Burks RT (2013) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus autograft. Arthrosc Tech 2:e417–e421PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yoo Y-S, Chang HG, Seo Y-J, Byun JC, Lee GK, Im H, Song SY (2012) Changes in the length of the medial patellofemoral ligament: an in vivo analysis using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 40:2142–2148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zaffagnini S, Colle F, Lopomo N, Sharma B, Bignozzi S, Dejour D, Marcacci M (2013) The influence of medial patellofemoral ligament on patellofemoral joint kinematics and patellar stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2164–2171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang G-Y, Zheng L, Ding H-Y, Li E-M, Sun B-S, Shi H (2015) Evaluation of medial patellofemoral ligament tears after acute lateral patellar dislocation: comparison of high-frequency ultrasound and MR. Eur Radiol 25:274–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ziegler CG, Fulkerson JP, Edgar C (2016) Radiographic reference points are inaccurate with and without a true lateral radiograph: the importance of anatomy in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Sports MedicineTrauma Surgery and Hand Surgery, Helios Clinic Munich WestMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgerySaarland UniversityHomburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of Shoulder Surgery and Sports TraumatologySchön-Kliniken LorschLorschGermany

Personalised recommendations