Better functional outcomes for ORIF in tibial eminence fracture treatment: a national comparative multicentric study of ORIF vs ARIF
- 19 Downloads
Tibial eminence fractures can occur in adults and are equivalent to an acute ACL rupture. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the therapeutic outcomes of ARIF versus ORIF in tibial eminence fractures. Our hypothesis was that ARIF does not offer better results.
A retrospective national multicentric study was conducted in five university hospitals between 2010 and 2015. A total of 65 consecutive patients were included. 33 patients were treated with ARIF and 32 with ORIF. Clinical functional outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score and IKDC score. Radiographic findings were recorded, and a statistical analysis carried out.
IKDC score at the mean last follow-up of 68.8 ± 11.8 months was significantly higher in the ORIF group with a mean difference of 20.2 points ± 8.9 (p = 0.028). There were early osteoarthritis findings in 12 patients (18.4%). At last follow-up, 7 patients (10.7%) presented complications.
In this retrospective multicentric study, better functional outcomes were observed in the ORIF group. This difference needs to be carefully interpreted as many confounding factors exist. In terms of complications, the results for both ORIF and ARIF are similar at midterm follow-up. ORIF should remain gold standard for tibial eminence fracture treatment.
Level of evidence
KeywordsTibial eminence fracture ARIF ORIF
All authors did acquisition and analysis of data. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.
No external funding was used.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this study.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
Informed consent was obtained for all subjects who participated in the study.
- 4.NJ Collins D Misra DT Felson KM Crossley EM Roos 2011 Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Ou Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63 S208 S228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Y Tegner J Lysholm 1985 Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries Clin Orthop Relat Res 198 43 49Google Scholar