Advertisement

No difference in postoperative rotational laxity after ACL reconstruction in patients with and without anterolateral capsule injury: quantitative evaluation of the pivot-shift test at 1-year follow-up

  • Yuji Hiroshima
  • Yuichi HoshinoEmail author
  • Nobuaki Miyaji
  • Toshikazu Tanaka
  • Daisuke Araki
  • Noriyuki Kanzaki
  • Takehiko Matsushita
  • Ryosuke Kuroda
KNEE
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To compare rotational laxity in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees retrospectively with and without concomitant anterolateral capsule (ALC) injury confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Sixty-two ACL-reconstructed knees (26 men, 36 women; median age 20 (range 13–59)) were included. Pivot-shift test was performed before ACL reconstruction and 1 year postoperatively under anesthesia with both clinical grading and quantitative measurement simultaneously. Clinical grading was determined according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) criteria (none, glide, clunk, or gross), and an electromagnetic measurement system was used to provide tibial acceleration as a quantitative parameter. The resence of concomitant ALC injury was confirmed retrospectively by MRI. The pivot-shift test was compared between ACL-reconstructed knees with and without ALC injury test for clinical grading and the independent t test for quantitative evaluation.

Results

ALC injury was identified in 26 of 62 (42%) knees. Before ACL reconstruction, there was no difference in the pivot-shift test results between the ACL-deficient knees with and without ALC injury in IKDC grading (n.s.) or tibial acceleration (1.1 ± 0.7 m/s2 and 1.4 ± 1.1 m/s2, respectively, n.s.). At 1 year postoperatively, no difference was observed between groups (IKDC, p = 0.90; tibial acceleration, 0.6 ± 0.3 m/s2 and 0.8 ± 0.6 m/s2, n.s.).

Conclusions

Concomitant ALC injury at the time of ACL injury had no effect on the rotational laxity of the knee in the postoperative course after ACL reconstruction. Therefore, additional treatment for ALC injury may not be warranted.

Level of evidence

IV.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction Anterolateral capsule Pivot-shift test Quantitative measurement MRI Electromagnetic measurement system 

Notes

Author contributions

YH designed the study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. YH, NM, TT, DA, and TM contributed to analysis and interpretation of data, and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. YH, NM, TT, DA, KN, TM and RK contributed to data collection and interpretation, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16K10902.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (the Institutional Review Board of Kobe University (ID No. B190055) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S, Fujita N, Tei K (2010) A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop 35(3):439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berruto M, Uboldi F, Gala L, Marelli B, Albisetti W (2013) Is triaxial accelerometer reliable in the evaluation and grading of knee pivot-shift phenomenon? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(4):981–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, Victor J, Verdonk P, Bellemans J (2013) Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. J Anat 223(4):321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH (2013) Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 29(9):1566–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Desai N, Björnsson H, Musahl V, Bhandari M, Petzold M, Fu FH et al (2014) Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(5):1009–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devitt BM, O’Sullivan R, Feller JA, Lash N, Porter TJ, Webster KE et al (2017) MRI is not reliable in diagnosing of concomitant anterolateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(4):1345–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Getgood A, Brown C, Lording T, Amis A, Claes S, Geeslin A et al (2019) The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the international ALC consensus group meeting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(1):166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105(2):136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guenther D, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Bell KM, Irarrazaval S, Fu FH, Musahl V et al (2017) The anterolateral capsule of the knee behaves like a sheet of fibrous tissue. Am J Sports Med 45(4):849–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Helito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, Demange MK, Bordalo-Rodrigues M (2017) Assessment of the anterolateral ligament of the knee by magnetic resonance imaging in acute injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 33(1):140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Helito CP, Helito PV, Costa HP, Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Pecora JR, Camanho GL et al (2014) MRI evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: assessment in routine 15-T scans. Skelet Radiol 43(10):1421–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoshino Y, Araujo P, Ahlden M, Samuelsson K, Muller B, Hofbauer M et al (2013) Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(4):975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yagi M, Mizuno K, Yamaguchi M et al (2007) In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1098–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kittl C, El-Daou H, Athwal KK, Gupte CM, Weiler A, Williams A et al (2016) The role of the anterolateral structures and the ACL in controlling laxity of the intact and ACL-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 44(2):345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuroda R, Hoshino Y, Kubo S, Araki D, Oka S, Nagamune K, Kurosaka M (2012) Similarities and differences of diagnostic manual tests for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a global survey and kinematics assessment. Am J Sports Med 40(1):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Labbe DR, de Guise JA, Mezghani N, Godbout V, Grimard G, Baillargeon D et al (2010) Feature selection using a principal component analysis of the kinematics of the pivot shift phenomenon. J Biomech 43(16):3080–3084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Visani A, Marcacci M (2010) Pivot-shift test: Analysis and quantification of knee laxity parameters using a navigation system. J Orthop Res 28(2):164–169Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miyaji N, Hoshino Y, Tanaka T, Nishida K, Araki D, Kanzaki N et al (2019) MRI-determined anterolateral capsule injury did not affect the pivot- shift in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 10:11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05376-8 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Musahl V, Griffith C, Irrgang JJ, Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Lopomo N et al (2016) Validation of quantitative measures of rotatory knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 44(9):2393–2398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Musahl V, Hoshino Y, Ahlden M, Araujo P, Irrgang JJ, Zaffagnini S et al (2012) The pivot shift: a global user guide. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(4):724–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Musahl V, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Costello J, Arner JW, Fu FH, Hoshino Y et al (2016) The influence of meniscal and anterolateral capsular injury on knee laxity in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 44(12):3126–3131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nagai K, Hoshino Y, Nishizawa Y, Araki D, Matsushita T, Matsumoto T et al (2015) Quantitative comparison of the pivot shift test results before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using the three-dimensional electromagnetic measurement system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(10):2876–2881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF, Wroble RR (1991) An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports Med 19(2):148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schon JM, Moatshe G, Brady AW, Serra Cruz R, Chahla J, Dornan GJ et al (2016) Anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction leads to overconstraint at any fixation angle. Am J Sports Med 44(10):2546–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sonia Farhan PH, Sudhakaran R, Thilak J (2017) Solving the mystery of the Antero lateral ligament. J Clin Diagnostic Res 11(3):1Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Fayard JM, Ferretti A, Helito CP, Lind M et al (2017) Anterolateral ligament expert group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol 18(2):91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sonnery-Cottet B, Lutz C, Daggett M, Dalmay F, Freychet B, Niglis L et al (2015) The involvement of the anterolateral ligament in rotational control of the knee. Am J Sports Med 44(5):1209–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taneja AK, Miranda FC, Braga CAP, Gill CM, Hartmann LGC, Santos DCB et al (2015) MRI features of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Skelet Radiol 44(3):403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vincent JP, Magnussen RA, Gezmez F, Uguen A, Jacobi M, Weppe F et al (2012) The anterolateral ligament of the human knee: an anatomic and histologic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(1):147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Der Watt L, Khan M, Rothrauff BB, Ayeni OR, Musahl V, Getgood A et al (2015) The structure and function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31(3):569–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineKobe UniversityKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations