Advertisement

The kneeling test is a valid method of assessing kneeling tolerance

  • Nicholas D. CalvertEmail author
  • Anne Smith
  • Lukas Kuster
  • Maya Calvert
  • Jay Ebert
  • Tim Ackland
  • Markus S. Kuster
KNEE
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

No quantitative test exists to reliably assess kneeling tolerance before and after surgery. The aim of this study was to validate a kneeling test, designed to quantify kneeling tolerance.

Method

A total of 179 participants (324 knees) were enrolled into the study, including 124 asymptomatic knees, 98 with osteoarthritis (OA), 85 following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 17 following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Patients were asked to kneel on a custom-built platform on a soft, firm and hard surface, at both 90° and 110° of knee flexion. A kneeling score of 0–100 was established for 90° and 110° with 100 being a complete absence of pain or discomfort. A linear mixed model with random intercept was used to estimate differences between conditions (healthy, OA, ACLR and TKA). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to test the strength of the association between the kneeling test and the forgotten joint score (FJS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Test–retest reliability was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

The kneeling test demonstrated good discriminative validity with differences at 110° between asymptomatic knees and knees with OA (difference = − 42, p < 0.001), following ACLR (− 12, p = 0.013) and TKA (− 26, p < 0.001). Similar differences were observed at 90°. The kneeling test demonstrated construct validity, with a moderately strong correlation observed between the kneeling test and the FJS and the WOMAC at 90° (FJS 0.474 [95%CI: 0.357, 0.577], WOMAC − 0.503 [− 0.389, − 0.602]) and 110° (FJS 0.579 [95% CI: 0.479, 0.665], WOMAC − 0.648 [− 0.560, − 0.722]). The ICC for the kneeling test at 90° and 110° was 0.843 (95% CI: 0.745, 0.905) and 0.926 (95% CI: 0.877, 0.956), respectively.

Conclusions

The kneeling test is a valid technique to quantitatively determine kneeling tolerance. It can aid in the assessment and modification of current surgical techniques to improve patient outcomes.

Level of evidence

III.

Notes

Funding

This study was not externally funded.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

MK has received royalties from Zimmer and Springer publishing. ND, AS, LK, MC, JE, and TA declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the participants gave their written consent and were recruited in agreement with the Helsinki Declaration. The study was approved by the ethics review board of Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (ID: 2016-065), Perth Western Australia.

References

  1. 1.
    Amin RM, Vasan V, Oni JK (2019) Kneeling after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676801 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barker KL, Hannink E, Pemberton S, Jenkins C (2018) Knee arthroplasty patients predicted versus actual recovery: what are their expectations about time of recovery following surgery and how long before they can do the tasks they want to do? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99:2230–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnes CL, Sharma A, Blaha JD, Nambu SN, Carroll ME (2011) Kneeling is safe for patients implanted with medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty designs. J Arthroplasty 26:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS (2012) The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty 27:430–436.e431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellamy N (1995) WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a user’s guide. Ontario, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berg P, Mjoberg B (1991) A lateral skin incision reduces peripatellar dysaesthesia after knee surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73:374–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borley N, Edwards D, Villar R (1995) Lateral skin flap numbness after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:13–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourne R, Chesworth C, Davis A, Mahomed N, Charron K (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Calvert N, Milne L, Kuster M (2016) A comparison of kneeling ability after lateral or midline incisions in total knee arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26:915–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coughlin KM, Incavo SJ, Doohen RR, Gamada K, Banks S, Beynnon BD (2007) Kneeling kinematics after total knee arthroplasty: anterior-posterior contact position of a standard and a high-flex tibial insert design. J Arthroplasty 22:160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han HS, Seong SC, Lee S, Lee MC (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : quadriceps versus patellar autograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hanson GR, Park SE, Suggs JF, Moynihan AL, Nha KW, Freiberg AA, Li G (2007) In vivo kneeling biomechanics after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 12:476–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassaballa M, Artz N, Weale A, Porteous A (2012) Alteration in skin sensation following knee arthroplasty and its impact on kneeling ability: a comparison of three common surgical incisions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1983–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassaballa MA, Porteous AJ, Newman JH (2004) Observed kneeling ability after total, unicompartmental and patellofemoral knee arthroplasty: perception versus reality. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:136–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hofer JK, Gejo R, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2011) Effects on tibiofemoral biomechanics from kneeling. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26:605–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hopton BP, Tommichan MC, Howell FR (2004) Reducing lateral skin flap numbness after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:289–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Incavo SJ, Mullins ER, Coughlin KM, Banks S, Banks A, Beynnon BD (2004) Tibiofemoral kinematic analysis of kneeling after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:906–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jariwala AC, Parthasarathy A, Kiran M, Johnston LR, Rowley DI (2017) Numbness around the total knee arthroplasty surgical scar: prevalence and effect on functional outcome. J Arthroplasty 32:2256–2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kartus J, Stener S, Lindahl S, Engstrom B, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1997) Factors affecting donor-site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kovindha K, Ganokroj P, Lertwanich P, Vanadurongwan B (2019) Quantifying anterior knee pain during specific activities after using the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 15:6–12Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liden M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J (2007) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study with a 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35:740–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palmer S, Servant C, Maguire J, Parish E, Cross M (2002) Ability to knee after total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:220–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Portland GH, Martin D, Keene G, Menz T (2005) Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of horizontal versus vertical harvest site incisions. Arthroscopy 21:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riaz O, Nisar S, Phillips H, Siddiqui A (2015) Quantifying the problem of kneeling after a two incision bone tendon bone arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 5:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsukada S, Kurosaka K, Nishino M, Hirasawa N (2018) Cutaneous hypesthesia and kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial comparing anterolateral and anteromedial skin incision. J Arthroplasty 33:3174–3180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weiss J, Noble P, Conditt M, Kohl H, Roberts S, Cook K, Gordon M, Mathis K (2002) What functional activites are important to patients with knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:172–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilkens KJ, Duong LV, McGarry MH, Kim WC, Lee TQ (2007) Biomechanical effects of kneeling after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:2745–2751CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsRoyal Perth HospitalPerthAustralia
  2. 2.School of Physiotherapy and Exercise ScienceCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Department of OrthopaedicsSir Charles Gairdner HospitalPerthAustralia
  4. 4.Department of AnaesthesiaSir Charles Gairdner HospitalPerthAustralia
  5. 5.School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science)University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  6. 6.Perth Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine CentreWest PerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations