Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 12, pp 3797–3802 | Cite as

Clavicle and coracoid process periprosthetic fractures as late post-operative complications in arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization

  • Siva Thangaraju
  • Mark Tauber
  • Peter Habermeyer
  • Frank MartetschlägerEmail author
SHOULDER

Abstract

Purpose

Arthroscopic-assisted stabilization surgery for acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) disruption shows excellent and reliable clinical outcomes. However, characteristic complications such as fracture of the clavicle and coracoid have been reported to occur during the early post-operative period. The main goal of this study was to highlight the occurrence of fractures as a late post-operative complication. The secondary goals were to describe possible fracture morphologies and treatment outcomes.

Method

Patient records from a single surgery centre were searched for all patients presenting with late fracture complication following arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular stabilization. Medical reports including the operative notes and pre- and post-operative X-rays were reviewed. A telephone interview was conducted with each patient to access the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score.

Results

A total of four patients presented with late fracture complication following arthroscopic-assisted ACJ stabilization surgery. All patients were males and presented following trauma at a median duration of 19.5 months after the index surgery. Fracture morphology differed between patients; the treatment was conservative in three patients, while one patient underwent osteosynthesis.

Conclusion

Traumatic peri-implant fractures can occur, even 2 years after arthroscopically assisted ACJ reconstruction. This needs to be considered when planning for surgical intervention in acute ACJ disruption, especially in a high-risk population.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, Level IV.

Keywords

Periprosthetic fracture Arthroscopy Acromioclavicular joint Arthroscopic-assisted stabilization Clavicular tunnel widening Late fracture complication 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges the fellowship provided by the Ministry of Health, Malaysia which enabled the attachment at the ATOS Clinic in Munich.

Disclaimer

None.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the present study. MT, PH and FM are consultants for Arthrex INc.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for AC Joint follow up has been achieved from Technical University of Munich—Approval No. 233/14.

References

  1. 1.
    Alaee F, Apostolakos J, Singh H, Holwein C, Diermeier T, Cote MP et al (2017) Lateral clavicle fracture with coracoclavicular ligament injury: a biomechanical study of 4 different repair techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(7):2013–2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baran S, Belisle JG, Granger EK, Tashjian RZ (2018) Functional and radiographic outcomes after allograft anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Trauma 32(4):204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, Solovyova O, Judson CH, Ziegler CG et al (2013) Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 29(2):387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clavert P, Meyer A, Boyer P, Gastaud O, Barth J, Duparc F, SFA (2015) Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicentre study of 116 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(8 Suppl):S313–S316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook JB, Krul KP (2018) Challenges in treating acromioclavicular separations: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26(19):669–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gowd AK, Liu JN, Cabarcas BC, Cvetanovich GL, Garcia GH, Manderle BJ et al (2018) Current concepts in the operative management of acromioclavicular dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative techniques. Am J Sports Med.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518795147 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hann C, Kraus N, Minkus M, Maziak N, Scheibel M (2018) Combined arthroscopically assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(1):212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hippensteel KJ, Brophy R, Smith M, Wright R (2018) Surgical volume and postoperative complications of acromioclavicular joint separations: analysis of the ABOS Part II examination. Am J Sports Med 46(13):3174–3181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma R, Smith PA, Smith MJ, Sherman SL, Flood D, Li X (2015) Managing and recognizing complications after treatment of acromioclavicular joint repair or reconstruction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8(1):75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martetschläger F, Horan MP, Warth RJ, Millett PJ) (2013) Complications after anatomic fixation and reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 41(12):2896–2903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martetschläger F, Saier T, Weigert A (2016) Effect of coracoid drilling for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction techniques on coracoid fracture risk. A biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 32:982–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM, Carson EW, Miller MD, Diduch DR (2012) Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 40(7):1628–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moneim MS, Balduini FC (1982) Coracoid fracture as a complication of surgical treatment by coracoclavicular tape fixation: a case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 168:133–135Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neer CSII (1968) Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58:43–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rush LN, Lake N, Stiefel EC, Hobgood ER, Ramsey JR, O’Brien MJ et al (2016) Comparison of short-term complications between 2 methods of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a multicentred study. Orthop J Sports Med 4(7):2325967116658419.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116658419 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scheibel M, Droschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N (2011) Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med 39(7):1507–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shin SJ, Jeon YS, Kim RG (2017) Arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation using 2 clavicular and 1 coracoid cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes. Arthroscopy 33(8):1458–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shin SJ, Kim NK (2015) Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single adjustable-loop-length suspensory fixation device in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arthroscopy 31(5):816–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh B, Mohanlal P, Bawale R (2016) Early failure of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using TightRope system. Acta Orthop Belg 82(1):119–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sirin E, Aydin N, Mert Topkar O (2018) Acromioclavicular joint injuries: diagnosis, classification and ligamentoplasty procedures. EFORT Open Rev 17(7):426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spiegl UJ, Smith SD, Euler SA, Dornan GJ, Millett PJ, Wijdicks CA (2014) Biomechanical consequences of coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques on clavicle strength. Am J Sports Med 42:1724–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tauber M, Valler D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Moroder P, Habermeyer P (2016) Arthroscopic stabilization of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: triple- versus single-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44(2):482–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turman KA, Miller CD, Miller MD (2010) Clavicular fractures following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with tendon graft: a report of three cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(6):1526–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Venjakob AJ, Salzmann GM, Gabel F, Buchmann S, Walz L, Spang JT et al (2013) Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomic reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: 58-month findings. Am J Sports Med 41(3):615–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Virtanen KJ, Savolainen V, Tulikoura I, Remes V, Haapamäki V, Pajarinen J et al (2014) Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation with autogenous tendon grafts. Springerplus 3:420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Woodmass JM, Esposito JG, Ono Y, Nelson AA, Boorman RS, Thornton GM et al (2015) Complications following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular separations: a systematic review of the literature. Open Access J Sports Med 6:97–107PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoo JC, Choi NH, Kim SY, Lim TK (2006) Distal clavicle tunnel widening after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with semitendinous tendon: a case report. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:256–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang LF, Yin B, Hou S, Han B, Huang DF (2017) Arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular joint disruption with TightRope™: outcome and complications after minimum 2 (2–5) years follow-up. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 25(2):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siva Thangaraju
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mark Tauber
    • 2
    • 4
  • Peter Habermeyer
    • 2
  • Frank Martetschläger
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Arthroscopy and Sports Injury Unit, Department of Orthopaedic and TraumatologyHospital Kuala LumpurKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Centre for Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryATOS Clinic MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Department for Orthopaedic Sports MedicineTechnical UniversityMunichGermany
  4. 4.Clinic for Orthopaedics and TraumatologyUniversity Clinic SalzburgSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations