Revision knee complexity classification—RKCC: a common-sense guide for surgeons to support regional clinical networking in revision knee surgery
- 201 Downloads
There is considerable variation in practice throughout Europe in both the services provided and in the outcomes of Revision Knee Surgery. In the UK, a recent report published called get it right first time (GIRFT) aims to improve patient outcomes through providing high quality, cost-effective care, and reducing complications. This has led to the development of a classification system that attempts to classify the complexity of revision knee surgery, aiming to encourage and support regional clinical networking.
The revision knee classification system (RKCC) incorporates not only complexity, but also patient factors, the presence of infection, the integrity of the extensor mechanism, and the soft tissues. It then provides guidance for clinical network discussion. Reliability and reproducibility testing have been performed to establish the inter- and intra-observer variabilities using this classification.
Good correlation between first attempt non-expert and experts, good intra-observer variability of non-expert, and an excellent correlation between second attempt non-expert and experts has been achieved. This supports the use of RKCC by both inexperienced and experienced surgeons.
The revision knee complexity classification has been proposed that offers a common-sense approach to recognize the increasing complexity in revision TKR cases. It provides a methodological assessment of revision knee cases and support regional clinical networking and triage of appropriate cases to revision units or specialist centres.
Level of Evidence
Expert opinion, Level V.
No funding received.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Briggs T (2012) Getting it right first time: improving the quality of orthopaedic care within the National Health Service in England. British Orthopaedic AssociationGoogle Scholar
- 4.Briggs T (2015) A national review of adult elective orthopaedic services in England. Getting it right first time. British Orthopaedic AssociationGoogle Scholar
- 15.McPherson EJ, Tontz W, Patzakis M, Woodsome C, Holtom P, Norris L, Shufelt C (1999) Outcome of infected total knee utilizing a staging system for prosthetic joint infection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 28(3):161–165Google Scholar
- 16.McPherson EJ, Woodson C, Holtom P, Roidis N, Shufelt C, Patzakis M (2002) Periprosthetic total hip infection: outcomes using a staging system. Clin Orthop Relat Res (403):8–15Google Scholar
- 18.Morgan-Jones R (2013) Infected knee replacement symposium, City Hall, Cardiff. 12–14 March 2013Google Scholar
- 20.National Cancer Intelligence Network (2010) Bone sarcomas: incidence and survival rates in England. http://www.ncin.org.uk/publications/data_briefings/bone_sarcomas_incidence_and_survival. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
- 24.Patel A, Pavlou G, Mújica-Mota R, Toms AD (2015) The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset. Bone Joint J 97-B(8):1076–1081CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar