Advertisement

Peroneus longus autograft can be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring tendon in single-bundle ACL reconstruction

  • Sholahuddin Rhatomy
  • Asa Ibrahim Zainal Asikin
  • Anggun E. Wardani
  • Tedjo Rukmoyo
  • Imelda Lumban-Gaol
  • Nicolaas C. BudhiparamaEmail author
KNEE
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

A peroneus longus tendon autograft is used in many orthopaedic procedures and it is biomechanically comparable to a hamstring tendon autograft. Despite its potential, there are few studies that have evaluated the use of the peroneus longus tendon in ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and donor site morbidity of ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts versus peroneus longus tendon autografts in patients with an isolated ACL injury.

Methods

Patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACL reconstruction were allocated to two groups (hamstring and peroneus longus) and observed prospectively. Graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Functional scores (IKDC, modified Cincinnati and Lysholm scores) were recorded preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Donor site morbidities were assessed with thigh circumference measurements and ankle scoring with the AOFAS and FADI.

Results

Fifty-two patients (hamstring n = 28, peroneus n = 24) met the inclusion criteria. The peroneus longus graft diameter (8.8 ± 0.7 mm) was significantly larger than the hamstring diameter (8.2 ± 0.8 mm) (p = 0.012). There were no significant differences between the pre- and 1-year postoperative score between the hamstring and peroneus longus groups in the IKDC (n.s), modified Cincinnati (n.s), and Lysholm (n.s). The mean for the AOFAS was 97.3 ± 4.2 and for the FADI 98 ± 3.4 in the peroneus longus group, with a significant decrease in thigh circumference in the hamstring group (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus autografts produces a functional score (IKDC, modified Cincinnati, Lysholm) comparable to that of hamstring autografts at a 1-year follow-up, with the advantages of larger graft diameter, less thigh hypotrophy and excellent ankle function based on AOFAS and FADI scores.

Level of evidence

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Abbreviations

ACL

Anterior cruciate ligament

BPTB

Bone–patellar tendon–bone

MPFL

Medial patellofemoral ligament

IKDC

International Knee Documentation Committee

MCL

Medial collateral ligament

AOFAS

American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score

FADI

Foot and Ankle Disability Index

KOOS

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dadang R. Sasetyo, MD, for his assistance with patient selection, history taking and obtaining patient consent, and Shinta Primasara, MD, for her help with postoperative functional data collection during patient rehabilitation.

Author contributions

NCB conceived the study, participated in its design, reviewed, edited and finalised the manuscript. SR carried out patient selection consisting of history taking, physical examination and MRI evaluation, explained the study to the patients and obtained the patients’ informed consent, performed all the ACL reconstruction surgery, collected intraoperative study data, reviewed and edited the paper. AIZA collected preoperative data including demographic data, preoperative functional scores and postoperative data, including functional scores and thigh circumference measurements, performed statistical analyses, wrote the paper and prepared the manuscript. AEW performed statistical analyses, wrote the paper and prepared the manuscript. ILG performed statistical analyses and interpretations, reference review, manuscript review and edits. TR co-ordinated the study design with all the authors and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No external funding was used.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

References

  1. 1.
    Adam F, Pape D, Schiel K, Steimer O, Kohn D, Rupp S (2004) Biomechanical properties of patellar and hamstring graft tibial fixation techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:71–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angthong C, Chernchujit B, Apivatgaroon A, Chaijenkit K, Nualon P, Suchao-in K (2015) The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon: a biomechanical and clinical evaluation of the donor ankle morbidity. J Med Assoc Thai 98:555–560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Kannus P, Kaplan M, Samani J, Renström P (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1503–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 27:444–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellis SJ, Williams BR, Wagshul AD, Pavlov H, Deland JT (2010) Deltoid ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft in flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int 31:781–789CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frank CB, Jackson DW (1997) The science of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1556–1576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heijne A, Werner S (2010) A 2-year follow-up of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective randomised outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:805–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerimoğlu S, Aynaci O, Saraçoğlu M, Aydin H, Turhan AU (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 42:38–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magnussen RA, Lawrence JTR, West RL, Toth AP, Taylor DC, Garrett WE (2012) Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy 28:526–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J, Pedroza AD, Jones MH, Andrish JT, Parker RD, Kaeding CC, Magnussen RA (2013) The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthroscopy 29:1948–1953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7(9):CD005960Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murawski CD, van Eck CF, Irrgang JJ, Tashman S, Fu FH (2014) Operative treatment of primary anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:685–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Otis JC, Deland JT, Lee S, Gordon J (2004) Peroneus brevis is a more effective evertor than peroneus longus. Foot Ankle Int 25:242–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Romanini E, D’Angelo F, De Masi S, Adriani E, Magaletti M, Lacorte E, Laricchiuta P, Sagliocca L, Morciano C, Mele A (2010) Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol 11:211–219CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rudy ME, Phatama KY (2017) Tensile strength comparison between peroneus longus and hamstring tendons: a biomechanical study. Int J Surg Open 9:41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sasetyo DR, Rhatomy S, Pontoh LA (2017) Peroneus longus tendon: the promising graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Asia Pac J Sport Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 9:25Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schlumberger M, Schuster P, Schulz M, Immendörfer M, Mayer P, Bartholomä J, Richter J (2017) Traumatic graft rupture after primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective analysis of incidence and risk factors in 2915 cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(5):1535–1541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schoderbek RJ, Treme GP, Miller MD (2007) Bone–patella tendon–bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26:525–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spragg L, Chen J, Mirzayan R, Love R, Maletis G (2016) The effect of autologous hamstring graft diameter on the likelihood for revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:1475–1481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Brown CH, Hayes WC (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Am J Sports Med 22:240–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thomas AC, Wojtys EM, Brandon C, Palmieri-Smith RM (2016) Muscle atrophy contributes to quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Sci Med Sport 19:7–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williams BR, Ellis SJ, Deyer TW, Pavlov H, Deland JT (2010) Reconstruction of the spring ligament using a peroneus longus autograft tendon transfer. Foot Ankle Int 31:567–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu C, Zhao J, Xie G (2016) Medial patella-femoral ligament reconstruction using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon as a combined procedure for recurrent patellar instability. Asia Pac J Sport Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 4:21–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr Soeradji Tirtonegoro General Hospital, Faculty of MedicineUniversitas Gadjah MadaYogyakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr Sardjito General Hospital, Faculty of MedicineUniversitas Gadjah MadaYogyakartaIndonesia
  3. 3.Nicolaas Institute of Constructive Orthopaedics Research and Education Foundation for Arthroplasty and Sports Medicine at Medistra HospitalJakartaIndonesia
  4. 4.RSUP dr. Soeradji TirtonegoroKlatenIndonesia
  5. 5.RSUP dr. SardjitoDaerah Istimewa YogyakartaIndonesia
  6. 6.Department of Radiology, Dr Soeradji Tirtonegoro General Hospital, Faculty of MedicineUniversitas Gadjah MadaYogyakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations