Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 12, pp 3881–3889 | Cite as

The effect of concomitant coracohumeral ligament release in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to prevent postoperative stiffness: a retrospective comparative study

  • Joo Hyun Park
  • Seok Hoon Yang
  • Sung Min Rhee
  • Joo Han OhEmail author
SHOULDER
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of coracohumeral ligament (CHL) release from the coracoid process concomitant with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for preventing postoperative stiffness.

Methods

Data on patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were collected retrospectively. Propensity score matching (1-to-1) was performed between a no-releasing group (Group I) and CHL-releasing group (Group II). In total, 76 patients in each group were matched. Clinical outcomes were assessed and compared between the two groups, including range of motion (ROM) and visual analogue scale for pain (pVAS) at postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The integrity of the repaired tendon was assessed at 1-year follow-up using either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography.

Results

External rotation (ER) at side at postoperative 3 months in Group II was better than that in Group I (48.6° ± 11.6° vs. 38.4° ± 13.0°, P < 0.001). When evaluating only patients with a small-to-medium sized tear at postoperative 3 months, ER at side was 49.8° ± 10.9° in Group II versus 37.8° ± 13.1° in Group I (P < 0.001). In patients with a large-to-massive sized tear, however, there was no significant difference in ER at side at postoperative 3 months (n.s.). There was no significant difference in ROM and functional scores at postoperative 6 months and 1 year, and there was no significant difference in healing failure rate (6 cases in Group I (7.9%), 2 cases in Group II (2.6%); n.s.). No complications of the CHL release procedure occurred.

Conclusions

In arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, CHL release from the coracoid process without creating a rotator interval defect could be an effective and safe method to prevent early postoperative stiffness, especially ER at side in patients with a small-to-medium sized tear. Therefore, CHL release can be used as a selective procedure to prevent postoperative stiffness in patients that may benefit from this procedure with decreased preoperative ER compared to the normal side.

Level of evidence

Level III.

Keywords

Rotator cuff tear Rotator cuff repair Coracohumeral ligament Coracoid process Range of motion 

Notes

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approved an exemption for this study due to its retrospective design (IRB No.: B-1808/484-106, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Institutional Review Board).

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal informed consent was not required.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MOV 6939 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Arai R, Nimura A, Yamaguchi K, Yoshimura H, Sugaya H, Saji T, Matsuda S, Akita K (2014) The anatomy of the coracohumeral ligament and its relation to the subscapularis muscle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1575–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barth J, Andrieu K, Fotiadis E, Hannink G, Barthelemy R, Saffarini M (2017) Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2196–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG (2005) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1229–1240Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH 3rd (2007) Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 23:124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buess E, Steuber KU, Waibl B (2005) Open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparative view of 96 cases. Arthroscopy 21:597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cho NS, Rhee YG (2008) Functional outcome of arthroscopic repair with concomitant manipulation in rotator cuff tears with stiff shoulder. Am J Sports Med 36:1323–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung SW, Huong CB, Kim SH, Oh JH (2013) Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome. Arthroscopy 29:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Roo PJ, Muermans S, Maroy M, Linden P, Van den Daelen L (2015) Passive mobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is not detrimental in the early postoperative period. Acta Orthopædica Belgica 81:485–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Field LD, Warren RF, O’Brien SJ, Altchek DW, Wickiewicz TL (1995) Isolated closure of rotator interval defects for shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med 23:557–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gartsman GM, Brinker MR, Khan M (1998) Early effectiveness of arthroscopic repair for full thickness tears of the rotator cuff: an outcome analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 80:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harryman DT 2nd, Matsen FA 3rd, Sidles JA (1997) Arthroscopic management of refractory shoulder stiffness. Arthroscopy 13:133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hatakeyama Y, Itoi E, Urayama M, Pradhan RL, Sato K (2001) Effect of superior capsule and coracohumeral ligament release on strain in the repaired rotator cuff tendon. Am J Sports Med 29:633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hsu SL, Ko JY, Chen SH, Wu RW, Chou WY, Wang CJ (2007) Surgical results in rotator cuff tears with shoulder stiffness. J Formos Med Assoc 106:452–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huberty DP, Schoolfield JD, Brady PC, Vadala AP, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS (2009) Incidence and treatment of postoperative stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 25:880–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Izumi T, Aoki M, Tanaka Y, Uchiyama E, Suzuki D, Miyamoto S, Fujimiya M (2011) Stretching positions for the coracohumeral ligament: Strain measurement during passive motion using fresh/frozen cadaver shoulders. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 3:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jost B, Koch PP, Gerber C (2000) Anatomy and functional aspects of the rotator interval. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim YS, Chung SW, Kim JY, Ok JH, Park I, Oh JH (2012) Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? Am J Sports Med 40:815–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim YS, Lee HJ, Park IJ (2014) Clinical outcomes do not support arthroscopic posterior capsular release in addition to anterior release for shoulder stiffness: a randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med 42:1143–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koide M, Hamada J, Hagiwara Y, Kanazawa K, Suzuki K (2016) A thickened coracohumeral ligament and superomedial capsule limit internal rotation of the shoulder joint: report of three cases. Case Rep Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9384974 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lastayo PC, Wright T, Jaffe R, Hartzel J (1998) Continuous passive motion after repair of the rotator cuff. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 80:1002–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levy O, Copeland SA (2001) Regeneration of the coracoacromial ligament after acromioplasty and arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) The interval slide in continuity: a method of mobilizing the anterosuperior rotator cuff without disrupting the tear margins. Arthroscopy 20:435–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C, Hodler J, Zanetti M (2004) Frozen shoulder: MR arthrographic findings. Radiology 233:486–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Namdari S, Green A (2010) Range of motion limitation after rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:290–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neer CS 2nd, Satterlee CC, Dalsey RM, Flatow EL (1992) The anatomy and potential effects of contracture of the coracohumeral ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:182–185Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Noël E, Thomas T, Schaeverbeke T, Thomas P, Bonjean M, Revel M (2000) Frozen shoulder. Jt Bone Spine 67:393–400Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oh CH, Oh JH, Kim SH, Cho JH, Yoon JP, Kim JY (2011) Effectiveness of subacromial anti-adhesive agent injection after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective randomized comparison study. Clin Orthop Surg 3:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oh JH, Kim SH, Lee HK, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS (2008) Moderate preoperative shoulder stiffness does not alter the clinical outcome of rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic release and manipulation. Arthroscopy 24:983–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oh JH, Song BW, Choi JA, Lee GY, Kim SH, Kim DH (2016) Measurement of coracohumeral distance in 3 shoulder positions using dynamic ultrasonography: correlation with subscapularis tear. Arthroscopy 32:1502–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Park S, Lee DH, Yoon SH, Lee HY, Kwack KS (2016) Evaluation of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder with fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI: association between clinical features and MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL (2010) Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to long-term stiffness? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:1034–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rowe CR, Zarins B (1981) Recurrent transient subluxation of the shoulder. J Bone Jt Surg Am 63:863–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Severud EL, Ruotolo C, Abbott DD, Nottage WM (2003) All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a long-term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy 19:234–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tauro JC (1998) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: analysis of technique and results at 2- and 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 14:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao W, Zheng X, Liu Y, Yang W, Amirbekian V, Diaz LE, Huang X (2012) An MRI study of symptomatic adhesive capsulitis. PLoS One 7:e47277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgerySeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalSeongnam-siRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.KS HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations