Gender-related morphological differences in sulcus angle and condylar height for the femoral trochlea using magnetic resonance imaging
- 22 Downloads
This study aimed to elucidate the primary differences in trochlear morphology between men and women utilizing three-dimensional magnetic resonance image reconstruction of the femoral trochlea.
Differences in anthropometric femoral trochlea data of 975 patients (825 women, 150 men) were evaluated. The following morphological parameters were measured at three flexion angles (15°, 30°, and 45°) of the femoral trochlea: the sulcus angle, condylar height, and the trochlear groove orientation and mediolateral groove position.
The sulcus angle was significantly greater in women than in men at 15° and 45° flexions (P < 0.05). However, there was no gender difference found in the sulcus angle at 30° flexion. Medial and lateral condylar height values were greater in men than in women for the three flexion angles (P < 0.01). The trochlear groove orientation and mediolateral groove position showed no gender-related differences.
Magnetic resonance image reconstruction demonstrated that measurement of trochlear morphology varied significantly between men and women. This study provides guidelines for the design of a suitable femoral component for total knee arthroplasty, considering gender-specific differences in the Korean population. Biomechanical guidelines for total knee arthroplasty in Korean individuals can be optimized using our finding, so as the risk of patellar dislocation to be decreased. Surgeons should be aware of gender differences in femoral trochlear to optimize choice of implant.
Level of evidence
KeywordsFemoral trochlea Korean patients Morphometry analysis Condylar height Trochlear groove
There was no funding for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Approval was obtained from the Yonsei Sarang Hospital Institutional Review Board (18-DR-03).
- 3.Brattström H (1964) Shape of the intercondylar groove normally and in recurrent dislocation of patella. A clinical and X-ray-anatomical investigation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 68:Suppl 68:61–148Google Scholar
- 8.Dejour H, Walch G, Neyret P, Adeleine P (1990) Dysplasia of the femoral trochlea. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 76:45–54Google Scholar
- 12.Feinstein WK, Noble PC, Kamaric E, Tullos HS (1996) Anatomic alignment of the patellar groove. Clin Orthop Relat Res:64–73Google Scholar
- 23.Murshed KA, Çiçekcibaşi AE, Ziylan T, Karabacakoğlu A (2004) Femoral sulcus angle measurements: an anatomical study of magnetic resonance images and dry bones. Turk J Med Sci 34:165–169Google Scholar
- 31.Rosenstein AD, Veazey B, Shephard D, Xu KT (2008) Gender differences in the distal femur dimensions and variation patterns in relation to TKA component sizing. Orthopedics 31:652Google Scholar