Advertisement

The supraspinatus occupation ratios of both the ≥ 50% articular- and bursal-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears were low and the infraspinatus occupation ratio of the ≥ 50% bursal-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears was low

  • Jae-Sung Yoo
  • Kang Heo
  • Seung-Gwan Park
  • Hee-Jung Ham
  • Joong-Bae SeoEmail author
SHOULDER
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the occupation ratio and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Methods

The study included and retrospectively investigated 683 patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears between 2013 and 2017. Fifty patients with impingement syndrome were also enrolled as the control group for normal-population comparison. The participants were divided into five groups: Group A, control group; Group B, < 50% articular-side tears; Group C, ≥ 50% articular-side tears; Group D, < 50% bursal-side tears; and Group E, ≥ 50% bursal-side tears. Muscle volume was evaluated by measurement of each occupation ratio of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons on the most lateral view of the T1-weighted oblique-sagittal images in which the scapular spine remained in contact with the scapular body.

Results

Fifty patients were enrolled in Group A. A total of 683 patients with Partial thickness rotator cuff tear were divided and classified into the following groups: 272 into Group B, 153 into Group C, 161 into Group D, and 97 into Group E. The supraspinatus occupation ratios of all partial-thickness rotator cuff tear groups were significantly lower than those of the control group. Furthermore, the supraspinatus occupation ratios of Groups C and E (≥ 50% partial-thickness rotator cuff tears) were significantly lower than those of Groups B and D (< 50% partial-thickness rotator cuff tears). However, the infraspinatus occupation ratio of only Group E was significantly lower than that of the other groups.

Conclusion

The supraspinatus occupation ratios of both the ≥ 50% articular- and bursal-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears were lower than those of the other partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Conversely, the infraspinatus occupation ratio of only the ≥ 50% bursal-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears was low.

Level of evidence

IV.

Keywords

Rotator cuff Magnetic resonance imaging Rotator cuff tear Occupation ratio Muscle volume Muscle hypotrophy 

Notes

Funding

No external funding was used.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standard of the institutional research committee with the 1964 Helsinki declaration.

References

  1. 1.
    Chung SW, Oh KS, Moon SG, Kim NR, Lee JW, Shim E et al (2017) Serial changes in 3-dimensional supraspinatus muscle volume after rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 45:2345–2354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA (1981) Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 86:127–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Connor PM, Banks DM, Tyson AB, Coumas JS, D’Alessandro DF (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the asymptomatic shoulder of overhead athletes: a 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 31:724–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN (2009) Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1701–1707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:64–74Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fukuda H (2000) Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a modern view on Codman’s classic. J Shoulder Elb Surg 9:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fukuda H, Hamada K, Nakajima T, Tomonaga A (1994) Pathology and pathogenesis of the intratendinous tearing of the rotator cuff viewed from en bloc histologic sections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:60–67Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeong HY, Kim HJ, Jeon YS, Rhee YG (2018) Factors predictive of healing in large rotator cuff tears: is it possible to predict retear preoperatively? Am J Sports Med 46:1693–1700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kikukawa K, Ide J, Kikuchi K, Morita M, Mizuta H, Ogata H (2014) Hypertrophic changes of the teres minor muscle in rotator cuff tears: quantitative evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1800–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim YS, Lee HJ, Kim JH, Noh DY (2018) When should we repair partial-thickness rotator cuff tears? outcome comparison between immediate surgical repair versus delayed repair after 6-month period of nonsurgical treatment. Am J Sports Med 46:1091–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lhee SH, Singh AK, Lee DY (2017) Does magnetic resonance imaging appearance of supraspinatus muscle atrophy change after repairing rotator cuff tears? J Shoulder Elb Surg 26:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) Transtendon arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness, articular surface tears of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 20:214–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mall NA, Kim HM, Keener JD, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Middleton WD et al (2010) Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2623–2633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Michelin P, Trintignac A, Dacher JN, Carvalhana G, Lefebvre V, Duparc F (2014) Magnetic resonance anatomy of the superior part of the rotator cuff in normal shoulders, assessment and practical implication. Surg Radiol Anat 36:993–1000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mihata T, McGarry MH, Pirolo JM, Kinoshita M, Lee TQ (2012) Superior capsule reconstruction to restore superior stability in irreparable rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 40:2248–2255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mochizuki T, Sugaya H, Uomizu M, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Sekiya I et al (2008) Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:962–969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nathani A, Smith K, Wang T (2018) Partial and full-thickness RCT: modern repair techniques. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 11:113–121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nimura A, Kato A, Yamaguchi K, Mochizuki T, Okawa A, Sugaya H et al (2012) The superior capsule of the shoulder joint complements the insertion of the rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:867–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oh JH, Park MS, Rhee SM (2018) Treatment strategy for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Surg 10:119–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park YB, Ryu HY, Hong JH, Ko YH, Yoo JC (2016) Reversibility of supraspinatus muscle atrophy in tendon-bone healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 44:981–988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pouliart N, Somers K, Eid S, Gagey O (2007) Variations in the superior capsuloligamentous complex and description of a new ligament. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:821–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rahu M, Kolts I, Poldoja E, Kask K (2017) Rotator cuff tendon connections with the rotator cable. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2047–2050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ranebo MC, Bjornsson Hallgren HC, Norlin R, Adolfsson LE (2017) Clinical and structural outcome 22 years after acromioplasty without tendon repair in patients with subacromial pain and cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1262–1270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, Windley J, Emery RJ (2006) Dead men and radiologists do not lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:116–121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sasaki T, Shitara H, Yamamoto A, Hamano N, Ichinose T, Shimoyama D et al (2018) What is the appropriate reference for evaluating the recovery of supraspinatus muscle atrophy after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? The occupation ratio of the supraspinatus may change after rotator cuff repair without volumetric improvement. Am J Sports Med 46:1416–1423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seo JB, Yoo JS, Jang HS, Kim JS (2015) Correlation of clinical symptoms and function with fatty degeneration of infraspinatus in rotator cuff tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1481–1488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shin SJ, Jeong JH, Jeon YS, Kim RG (2016) Preservation of bursal-sided tendon in partial-thickness articular-sided rotator cuff tears: a novel arthroscopic transtendon anatomic repair technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:1701–1708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomazeau H, Rolland Y, Lucas C, Duval JM, Langlais F (1996) Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand 67:264–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vidt ME, Santago AC II, Tuohy CJ, Poehling GG, Freehill MT, Kraft RA et al (2016) Assessments of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy from a single magnetic resonance image slice are not predictive of 3-dimensional measurements. Arthroscopy 32:128–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolff AB, Sethi P, Sutton KM, Covey AS, Magit DP, Medvecky M (2006) Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:715–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryDankook University College of MedicineCheonanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations