The 6-m timed hop test is a prognostic factor for outcomes in patients with meniscal tears treated with exercise therapy or arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a secondary, exploratory analysis of the Odense–Oslo meniscectomy versus exercise (OMEX) trial

  • Nina Jullum KiseEmail author
  • Ewa M. Roos
  • Silje Stensrud
  • Lars Engebretsen
  • May Arna Risberg



To identify the prognostic factors for 2-year patient-reported outcomes in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears treated with exercise therapy (ET) or arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM).


One hundred and seven patients, with mean age 49.6 (SD 6.2) years and BMI 25.7 (SD 3.7), were included in this analysis of data from the OMEX trial ( NCT01002794). Linear and Poisson regression models were built to explore the associations between potential prognostic factors (patient characteristics, knee function-related and disease-related factors) and 2-year patient-reported outcomes: the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales Pain, Symptoms, ADL, Sport/Rec, QoL and 5-point Global Rating of Change scales for knee pain (GRC Pain) and function (GRC Function). Analyses were performed for the whole cohort and for the two treatment groups (n = 55 and 52) with adjustments for age, sex, BMI and baseline KOOS.


For the whole cohort, a 1-s better baseline 6-m timed hop test result was associated with 3.1–7.1 points better 2-year scores for all KOOS subscales (95% CIs 1.1–5.2 to 4.1–10.1 points). A 1.61–2.80 s better test was associated with scores equivalent to previously calculated clinical relevant differences for each KOOS subscale. For the groups of patients treated with ET and APM, respectively, 2.09–3.60 s and 0.63–1.99 s better tests were associated with clinical relevant differences. For the whole cohort, a 1-s better test was associated with 26% (95% CI 15–38%) and 22% (95% CI 11–34%) higher possibility for better or much better GRC Pain and Function scores. Patients treated with ET had 17% (95% CI 2–33%) increased possibility for better or much better GRC Pain score, and patients treated with APM had 65% (95% CI 32–108%) and 70% (95% CI 38–109%) increased possibility for better or much better GRC Pain and Function scores.


The 6-m timed hop test result was a significant prognostic factor for 2-year patient-reported outcomes in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears, especially in those treated with APM.

Level of evidence


Key words

Degenerative meniscal tears Degenerative meniscal lesions Middle aged Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy Exercise therapy Prognostic factors Lower extremity performance 6-m timed hop test 



The authors acknowledge the patients in this study for their participation. Further, they acknowledge research coordinators Kristin Bølstad and Emilie Jul-Larsen for the organization of the participants, physiotherapists Marte Lund, Karin Rydevik and Christian Vilming for assistance with data collection and radiologist Rana Tariq for reading the MRI scans. Nanna Kurtze is acknowledged for giving permission to copy her previously published table illustrating the calculation of the HUNT 1 activity index. The authors also acknowledge the Norwegian Sports Medicine Clinic (NIMI), Oslo, Norway, for supporting the Norwegian Research Center for Active Rehabilitation (NAR) with rehabilitation facilities and research staff. NAR is a collaboration between the Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, and NIMI. Finally, the authors acknowledge the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum, for accessibility to the outpatient and surgical clinics.

Author contributions

Ewa M. Roos, May Arna Risberg (MAR) and Silje Stensrud (SS) developed the concept and design for the RCT this study cohort is extracted from. SS, Lars Engebretsen and Nina Jullum Kise (NJK) collected the data. NJK and MAR developed the idea for this secondary study of data from the RCT. NJK wrote the manuscript. NJK and independent statistician Jonas Ranstam did the statistical analyses. All authors had full access to all of the data including statistical reports and tables in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


This study was funded by Sophies Minde Ortopedi AS, Swedish Rheumatism Association, Swedish Scientific Council, Region of Southern Denmark, Danish Rheumatism Association, and the Health Region of South-East Norway. The researchers were independent from the funder.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare that they have no support from any company for the submitted work; no relationships with any company that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; their spouses, partners, or children have no financial relationships that may be relevant to the submitted work; and they have no non-financial interests that may be relevant to the submitted work.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the regional ethics committee of the Health Region of South-East Norway (reference No. 2009/230).

Supplementary material

167_2018_5241_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (262 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 263 KB)


  1. 1.
    Amin S, Niu J, Guermazi A, Grigoryan M, Hunter DJ, Clancy M et al (2007) Cigarette smoking and the risk for cartilage loss and knee pain in men with knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Dunn W, Beaufils P, Cohen M, Cole BJ et al (2011) Interobserver reliability of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification of meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med 39:926–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Badlani JT, Borrero C, Golla S, Harner CD, Irrgang JJ (2013) The effects of meniscus injury on the development of knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Am J Sports Med 41:1238–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bender R, Lange S (2001) Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how? J Clin Epidemiol 54:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bloecker K, Guermazi A, Wirth W, Benichou O, Kwoh CK, Hunter DJ et al (2013) Tibial coverage, meniscus position, size and damage in knees discordant for joint space narrowing—data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 21:419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bolgla LA, Keskula DR (1997) Reliability of lower extremity functional performance tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 26:138–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bremander AB, Dahl LL, Roos EM (2007) Validity and reliability of functional performance tests in meniscectomized patients with or without knee osteoarthritis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:120–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drouin JM, Valovich-mcLeod TC, Shultz SJ, Gansneder BM, Perrin DH (2004) Reliability and validity of the Biodex system 3 pro isokinetic dynamometer velocity, torque and position measurements. Eur J Appl Physiol 91:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Englund M, Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) Impact of type of meniscal tear on radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a sixteen-year followup of meniscectomy with matched controls. Arthritis Rheum 48:2178–2187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gauffin H, Sonesson S, Meunier A, Magnusson H, Kvist J (2017) Knee arthroscopic surgery in middle-aged patients with meniscal symptoms: a 3-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized study. Am J Sports Med 45:2077–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gauffin H, Tagesson S, Meunier A, Magnusson H, Kvist J (2014) Knee arthroscopic surgery is beneficial to middle-aged patients with meniscal symptoms: a prospective, randomised, single-blinded study. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:1808–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ha JK, Jang HW, Jung JE, Cho SI, Kim JG (2014) Clinical and radiologic outcomes after meniscus allograft transplantation at 1-year and 4-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 30:1424–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herrlin S, Hallander M, Wange P, Weidenhielm L, Werner S (2007) Arthroscopic or conservative treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears: a prospective randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herrlin SV, Wange PO, Lapidus G, Hallander M, Werner S, Weidenhielm L (2013) Is arthroscopic surgery beneficial in treating non-traumatic, degenerative medial meniscal tears? A five year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:358–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katz JN, Brophy RH, Chaisson CE, de Chaves L, Cole BJ, Dahm DL et al (2013) Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 368:1675–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kerkhof HJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Arden NK, Metrustry S, Castano-Betancourt M, Hart DJ et al (2014) Prediction model for knee osteoarthritis incidence, including clinical, genetic and biochemical risk factors. Ann Rheum Dis 73:2116–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khan M, Evaniew N, Bedi A, Ayeni OR, Bhandari M (2014) Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Med J 186:1057–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kise NJ, Risberg MA, Stensrud S, Ranstam J, Engebretsen L, Roos EM (2016) Exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear in middle aged patients: randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up. BMJ 354:i3740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kurtze N, Rangul V, Hustvedt BE, Flanders WD (2008) Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trondelag Health Study: HUNT 1. Scand J Public Health 36:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin W, Alizai H, Joseph GB, Srikhum W, Nevitt MC, Lynch JA et al (2013) Physical activity in relation to knee cartilage T2 progression measured with 3 T MRI over a period of 4 years: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 21:1558–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JP et al (2014) Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet 383:101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mattila VM, Sihvonen R, Paloneva J, Fellander-Tsai L (2016) Changes in rates of arthroscopy due to degenerative knee disease and traumatic meniscal tears in Finland and Sweden. Acta Orthop 87:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oiestad BE, Juhl CB, Eitzen I, Thorlund JB (2015) Knee extensor muscle weakness is a risk factor for development of knee osteoarthritis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil 23:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PF, Miaux Y, White D et al (2004) Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 12:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS (1998) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ross MD, Langford B, Whelan PJ (2002) Test-retest reliability of 4 single-leg horizontal hop tests. J Strength Cond Res 16:617–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schiphof D, Boers M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM (2008) Differences in descriptions of Kellgren and Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 67:1034–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shrier I, Platt RW (2008) Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol 8:70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itala A, Joukainen A, Nurmi H et al (2018) Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus placebo surgery for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 2-year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 77:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itala A, Joukainen A, Nurmi H et al (2013) Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear. N Engl J Med 369:2515–2524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stensrud S, Risberg MA, Roos EM (2014) Knee function and knee muscle strength in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears eligible for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Br J Sports Med 48:784–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stensrud S, Roos EM, Risberg MA (2012) A 12-week exercise therapy program in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscus tears: a case series with 1-year follow-up. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42:919–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sueyoshi T, Nakahata A, Emoto G, Yuasa T (2017) Single-leg hop test performance and isokinetic knee strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. Orthop J Sports Med 5:2325967117739811PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Swart NM, van Oudenaarde K, Reijnierse M, Nelissen RG, Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM et al (2016) Effectiveness of exercise therapy for meniscal lesions in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport 19:990–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Textor J, Hardt J, Knuppel S (2011) DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology 22:745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thorlund JB, Juhl CB, Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2015) Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms. Br J Sports Med 49:1229–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thorstensson CA (2004) Reduced functional performance in the lower extremity predicted radiographic knee osteoarthritis five years later. Ann Rheum Dis 63:402–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    White H (1982) Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yim JH, Seon JK, Song EK, Choi JI, Kim MC, Lee KB et al (2013) A comparative study of meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment for degenerative horizontal tears of the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med 41:1565–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Jullum Kise
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ewa M. Roos
    • 2
  • Silje Stensrud
    • 3
  • Lars Engebretsen
    • 4
  • May Arna Risberg
    • 5
  1. 1.Orthopaedic DepartmentMartina Hansens HospitalSandvikaNorway
  2. 2.Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
  3. 3.OsloMet, Oslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway
  4. 4.Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, The Norwegian School of Sports SciencesOsloNorway
  5. 5.Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Sports MedicineOslo University Hospital, The Norwegian School of Sport SciencesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations