Advertisement

The reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test mimics anatomical complexity in lateral patellar instability

  • Felix Zimmermann
  • Michael C. Liebensteiner
  • Peter Balcarek
KNEE
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a dynamic physical examination test that functionally simulates actual patellar instability events and that mimics the range of patellar stabilizer insufficiency in an individual patient.

Methods

Seventy-eight consecutive patients (male/female 35/43; mean age 22 ± 7 years) with recurrent lateral patellar instability and 35 controls (male/female 16/19; mean age 31 ± 14 years) were prospectively evaluated using the reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test (ReDPAT). Anatomical predisposition was assessed according to Dejour’s classification of trochlear dysplasia, tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance, tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament distance, patellar height, and varus/valgus malalignment.

Results

The study group had an average of 3.4 ± 1.0 (1–6) anatomical risk factors for lateral patellar dislocation. Severe trochlear dysplasia (84%) and patella alta (49%) were the most common. Test sensitivity and specificity was 93.7% (95% CI 0.8584–0.9791) and 88.2% (95% CI 0.7255–0.9670), respectively. The positive predictive value reached 94.9% (95% CI 0.8739–0.9859) and the negative predictive value was 85.7% (95% CI 0.6974–0.9519). The ReDPAT results became positive at a mean knee flexion angle of 58° ± 17° (20°–90°). Knee flexion angle correlated significantly with the severity of trochlear dysplasia (p = 0.018), valgus deformity (p = 0.011), and the total number of anatomical risk factors (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

This study introduced the reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test as a reliable clinical examination tool in the assessment of lateral patellar instability. The results of this study indicate that the degree of knee joint flexion at which the provocative sense of apprehension becomes positive correlates with severity of trochlear dysplasia, valgus deformity and the total number of anatomical risk factors for patellar instability. This test indicates the patient-specific end of stable patellar tracking and the beginning of patellar stabilizer insufficiency. Therefore, this test might be helpful in deciding for or against a bony procedure in the treatment of patellar dislocation.

Level of evidence

II.

Keywords

Patellar instability Dynamic apprehension test Risk factors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was awarded the first poster prize for “Clinical Research” at the 35th AGA Congress 2018, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No external funding was used.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Felix Zimmermann, Michael C Liebensteiner and Peter Balcarek declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical council Baden-Württemberg, Germany (F-2018-004).

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad CS, McCarthy M, Gomez JA, Shubin Stein BE (2009) The moving patellar apprehension test for lateral patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 37:791–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amis AA, Oguz C, Bull AM, Senavongse W, Dejour D (2008) The effect of trochleoplasty on patellar stability and kinematics: a biomechanical study in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:864–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balcarek P, Ammon J, Frosch S, Walde TA, Schüttrumpf JP, Ferlemann KG, Lill H, Stürmer KM, Frosch KH (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the medial patellofemoral ligament lesion in acute lateral patellar dislocations considering trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance. Arthroscopy 26:926–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balcarek P, Oberthür S, Hopfensitz S, Frosch S, Walde TA, Wachowski MM, Schüttrumpf JP, Stürmer KM (2014) Which patellae are likely to redislocate? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2308–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balcarek P, Rehn S, Howells NR, Eldridge JD, Kita K, Dejour D, Nelitz M, Banke IJ, Lambrecht D, Harden M, Friede T (2017) Results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction compared with trochleoplasty plus individual extensor apparatus balancing in patellar instability caused by severe trochlear dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3869–3877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Lerat JL, Dejour H (1982) Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:317–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dejour D, Reynaud P, Lecoultre B (1998) Douleurs et instabilite rotulienne. Essai de classification. Med Hyg (Geneve) 56:1466–1471Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dickschas J, Harrer J, Reuter B, Schwitulla J, Strecker W (2015) Torsional osteotomies of the femur. J Orthop Res 33:318–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dickschas J, Tassika A, Lutter C, Harrer J, Strecker W (2017) Torsional osteotomies of the tibia in patellofemoral dysbalance. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fairbank HA (1936) Internal derangement of the knee in children and adolescents. Proc R Soc Med 30:427–432Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fitzpatrick CK, Steensen RN, Tumuluri A, Trinh T, Bentley J, Rullkoetter PJ (2016) Computational analysis of factors contributing to patellar dislocation. J Orthop Res 34:444–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fucentese SF, von Roll A, Koch PP, Epari DR, Fuchs B, Schöttle PB (2006) The patella morphology in trochlear dysplasia—a comparative MRI study. Knee 13:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holme TJ, Henckel J, Hartshorn K, Cobb JP, Hart AJ (2015) Computed tomography scanogram compared to long leg radiograph for determining axial knee alignment. Acta Orthop 86:440–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hughston JC (1968) Subluxation of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:1003–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liebensteiner MC, Dirisamer F, Balcarek P, Schoettle P (2017) Guidelines for treatment of lateral patella dislocations in skeletally mature patients. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead) 46(2):E86–E96Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lippacher S, Dejour D, Elsharkawi M, Dornacher D, Ring C, Dreyhaupt J, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2012) Observer agreement on the Dejour trochlear dysplasia classification: a comparison of true lateral radiographs and axial magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 40:837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nelitz M, Williams RS, Lippacher S, Reichel H, Dornacher D (2014) Analysis of failure and clinical outcome after unsuccessful medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in young patients. Int Orthop 38:2265–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Post WR, Fithian DC (2018) Patellofemoral instability: a consensus statement from the AOSSM/PFF patellofemoral instability workshop. Orthop J Sports Med 6(1):2325967117750352PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reider B (1999) The orthopaedic physical examination. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 201–248Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schneider DK, Grawe B, Magnussen RA, Ceasar A, Parikh SN, Wall EJ, Colosimo AJ, Kaeding CC, Myer GD (2016) Outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 44:2993–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schöttle PB, Zanetti M, Seifert B, Pfirrmann CW, Fucentese SF, Romero J (2006) The tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. Knee 13:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seitlinger G, Scheurecker G, Högler R, Labey L, Innocenti B, Hofmann S (2012) Tibial tubercle–posterior cruciate ligament distance: a new measurement to define the position of the tibial tubercle in patients with patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 40:1119–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Senavongse W, Amis AA (2005) The effects of articular, retinacular, or muscular deficiencies on patellofemoral joint stability: a biomechanical study in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Song G-Y, Hong L, Zhang H, Zhang J, Li X, Li Y, Feng H (2014) Trochleoplasty versus nontrochleoplasty procedures in treating patellar instability caused by severe trochlear dysplasia. Arthroscopy 30:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steensen RN, Bentley JC, Trinh TQ, Backes JR, Wiltfong RE (2015) The prevalence and combined prevalences of anatomic factors associated with recurrent patellar dislocation: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 43:921–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Testa EA, Camathias C, Amsler F, Henle P, Friederich NF, Hirschmann MT (2017) Surgical treatment of patellofemoral instability using trochleoplasty or MPFL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2309–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tscholl PM, Wanivenhaus F, Fucentese SF (2017) Conventional radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging for the analysis of trochlear dysplasia: the influence of selected levels on magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 45:1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Zimmermann
    • 1
  • Michael C. Liebensteiner
    • 2
  • Peter Balcarek
    • 1
  1. 1.Arcus SportklinikPforzheimGermany
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations