Advertisement

The lateral fibulotalocalcaneal ligament complex: an ankle stabilizing isometric structure

  • Jordi Vega
  • Francesc Malagelada
  • Maria-Cristina Manzanares Céspedes
  • Miki Dalmau-PastorEmail author
ANKLE

Abstract

Purpose

Ankle lateral collateral ligament complex has been the focus of multiple studies. However, there are no specific descriptions of how these ligaments are connected to each other as part of the same complex. The aim of this study was to describe in detail the components of the lateral collateral ligament complex—ATFL and CFL—and determine its anatomical relationships.

Methods

An anatomical study was performed in 32 fresh-frozen below-the-knee ankle specimens. A plane-per-plane anatomical dissection was performed. Overdissecting the area just distal to the inferior ATFL fascicle was avoided to not alter the original morphology of the ligaments and the connecting fibers between them. The characteristics of the ATFL and CFL, as well as any connecting fibers between them were recorded. Measures were obtained in plantar and dorsal flexion, and by two different observers.

Results

The ATFL was observed as a two-fascicle ligament in all the specimens. The superior ATFL fascicle was observed intra-articular in the ankle, in contrast to the inferior fascicle. The mean distance measured between superior ATFL fascicle insertions increases in plantar flexion (median 19.2 mm in plantar flexion, and 12.6 mm in dorsal flexion, p < 0.001), while the same measures observed in the inferior ATFL fascicle does not vary (median 10.6 mm in plantar flexion, and 10.6 mm in dorsal flexion, n.s.). The inferior ATFL fascicle was observed with a common fibular origin with the CFL. The CFL distance between insertions does not vary with ankle movement (median 20.1 mm in plantar flexion, and 19.9 mm in dorsal flexion, n.s.). The inferior ATFL fascicle and the CFL were connected by arciform fibers, that were observed as an intrinsic reinforcement of the subtalar joint capsule.

Conclusion

The superior fascicle of the ATFL is a distinct anatomical structure, whereas the inferior ATFL fascicle and the CFL share some features being both isometric ligaments, having a common fibular insertion, and being connected by arciform fibers, and forming a functional and anatomical entity, that has been named the lateral fibulotalocalcaneal ligament (LFTCL) complex. The clinical relevance of this study is that the superior fascicle of the ATFL is anatomical and functionally a distinct structure from the inferior ATFL fascicle. The superior ATFL fascicle is an intra-articular ligament, that will most probably not be able to heal after a rupture, and a microinstability of the ankle is developed. However, when the LFTCL complex is injured, classical ankle instability resulted. In addition, because of the presence of LFTCL complex, excellent results are observed when an isolated repair of the ATFL is performed even when an injury of both the ATFL and CFL exists.

Keywords

Ankle ligaments Anatomy Ankle instability Microinstability Ankle lateral collateral ligament complex 

Notes

Funding

No funding was received for this research project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained with IRB number 00003099.

References

  1. 1.
    Baumhauer JF, O’Brien T (2002) Surgical considerations in the treatment of ankle instability. J Athl Train 37(4):458–462PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broström L (1966) Sprained ankles. V. Treatment and prognosis in recent ligament ruptures. Acta Chir Scand 132(5):537–550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks SC, Potter BT, Rainey JB (1981) Treatment for partial tears of the lateral ligament of the ankle: a prospective trial. Br Med J 282:606–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burks RT, Morgan J (1994) Anatomy of the lateral ankle ligaments. Am J Sports Med 22(1):72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dalmau-Pastor M, Vega J (2017) Letter regarding: cadaveric analysis of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 38(3):343–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edama M, Kageyama I, Kikumoto T, Nakamura M, Ito W, Nakamura E, Hirabayashi R, Takabayashi T, Inai T, Onishi H (2017) Morphological features of the anterior talofibular ligament by the number of fiber bundles. Ann Anat 28:69–74Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferran NA, Maffulli N (2006) Epidemiology of sprains of the lateral ankle ligament complex. Foot Ankle Clin 11(3):659–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giebel GD, Meyer C, Koebke J, Giebel G (1997) The arterial supply of the ankle joint and its importance for the operative fracture treatment. Surg Radiol Anat 19:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Golanó P, Vega J, de Leeuw PAJ, Malagelada F, Manzanares MC, Götzens V, van Dijk CN (2010) Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(5):557–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golanó P, Dalmau-Pastor M, Vega J, Batista JP (2014) The ankle in football, sports and traumatology: anatomy of the ankle. In: D’Hooghe PPRN, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. 1st edn. Springer, Paris, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harper MC (1991) The lateral ligamentous support of the subtalar joint. Foot Ankle 11(6):354–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee KT, Lee JI, Sung KS, Kim JY, Kim ES, Lee SH, Wang JH (2008) Biomechanical evaluation against calcaneofibular ligament repair in the Broström procedure: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:781–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee KT, Park YU, Kim JS, Kim JB, Kim KC, Kang SK (2011) Long-term results after modified Broström procedure without calcaneo-fibular ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 32(2):153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ludolph E, Hierholzer G, Gretenkord K, Ryan U (1984) Research into the anatomy and X-ray diagnostics of the fibular ligaments at the ankle joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103(5):348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ludolph E, Hierholzer G (1986) Anatomy of the ligaments of the upper ankle joint. Orthopade 15:410–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Maffulli GD, Oliva F, Testa V, Capasso G, Denaro V (2013) Isolated anterior talofibular ligament Broström repair for chronic lateral ankle instability: 9-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 41:858–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKeon KE, Wright RW, Johnson JE, McCormick JJ, Klein SE (2012) Vascular anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Milner CE, Soames RW (1998) Anatomy of the collateral ligaments of the human ankle joint. Foot Ankle Int 19:757–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murray MM (2009) Current status and potential for primary ACL repair. Clin Sports Med 28(1):51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neuschwander TB, Indresano AA, Hughes TH, Smith BW (2013) Footprint of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 34(4):582–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Renstrom FH, Lynch SA (1999) Acute injuries of the ankle. Foot Ankle Clin 4:697–711Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sarrafian SK (1993) Anatomy of the foot and ankle, 2nd edn. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 159–217Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stephens MM, Sammarco GJ (1992) The stabilizing role of the lateral ligament complex around the ankle and subtalar joints. Foot Ankle 13(3):130–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taser F, Shafiq Q, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (2006) Enlarged perforating branch of peroneal artery and extra crural fascia in close relationship with the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Surg Radiol Anat 28:108–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trouilloud P, Dia A, Grammont P, Gelle MC, Autissier JM (1988) Variations du ligament calcaneo-fibulaire. Aplications à la cinématique de la cheville (Variations in the calcaneofibular ligament. Applications to ankle kinetics). Bull Assoc Anat 72:31–35Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    van den Bekerom MPJ, Oostra RJ, Golanó P, van Dijk CN (2008) The anatomy in relation to injury of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle: a current concepts review. Clin Anat 21:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vega J, Golanó P, Pellegrino A, Rabat E, Peña F (2013) All-inside arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament repair for ankle instability with a knotless suture anchor technique. Foot Ankle Int 34(12):1701–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vega J, Rabat E (2013) Innovations in chronic ankle instability. Rev Cir Pie 27(2):71–79Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vega J, Peña F, Golanó P (2016) Minor or occult ankle instability as a cause of anterolateral pain after ankle sprain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(4):1116–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vega J, Dalmau M, Malagelada F, Fargues-Polo B, Peña F (2017) Ankle arthroscopy: an update. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1395–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Viladot A, Lorenzo JC, Salazar J, Rodríguez A (1984) The subtalar joint: embryology and morphology. Foot Ankle 5(2):54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordi Vega
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Francesc Malagelada
    • 4
  • Maria-Cristina Manzanares Céspedes
    • 5
  • Miki Dalmau-Pastor
    • 1
    • 3
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Experimental Pathology and Therapeutics DepartmentUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Foot and Ankle UnitHospital Quirón Barcelona and iMove Traumatology Tres TorresBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Groupe de Recherche et d’Etude en Chirurgie Mini-Invasive du Pied (GRECMIP)MerignacFrance
  4. 4.Foot and Ankle Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic SurgeryRoyal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS TrustLondonUK
  5. 5.Faculty of Health Sciences at ManresaUniversity of Vic, Central University of CataloniaManresaSpain

Personalised recommendations