Single intra-articular injection of lightly cross-linked hyaluronic acid reduces knee pain in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
The primary objective was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Monovisc™ in the relief of joint pain in patients with idiopathic knee OA compared to saline injection. It was hypothesized that patient success, defined as ≥ 50% improvement from baseline and ≥ 20 mm absolute improvement from baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, would be greater in the Monovisc™ group compared to the Saline control group.
In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with idiopathic, symptomatic, knee OA were randomized to either 4 ml single injection of Monovisc™ or 4 ml injection of 0.9% saline. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was used to assess patient outcomes at 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, and 26 weeks post-injection. The primary effectiveness endpoint was a 50% improvement and ≥ 20 mm improvement from baseline in the WOMAC pain through 26 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included a ≥ 20 mm improvement from baseline on the WOMAC physical function, patient global assessment, evaluator global assessment, and knee range of motion.
369 patients (154 male, 215 female) were randomized to either Monovisc™ or saline. The Monovisc™ group had a significantly greater rate of patient success (e.g. ≥ 50% improvement and ≥ 20 mm absolute improvement from baseline in the WOMAC pain through Week 26) compared to saline (p = 0.043).
Monovisc™, a single-injection intra-articular HA device, is a safe and effective treatment for providing a clinically meaningful reduction in knee pain within 2 weeks. The results of this study support the use of a single injection of hyaluronic acid (Monovisc™) for patients with symptomatic knee OA in patients older than 45 years, as a safe and effective alternative for patients who may want an alternative treatment modality or may not be candidates for partial or total knee replacement.
Level of evidence
I, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
KeywordsMonovisc™ Hyaluronic acid Knee osteoarthritis Intra-articular injection Knee joint pain
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Visual analog scale
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications
United States dollar
American Academy of Orthopaedics
Institutional Review Board
Good clinical practice
International Conference on Harmonization
Body mass index
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
Generalized estimating equations
Minimum clinically important differences
Range of motion
American College of Rheumatology
Osteoarthritis Research Society International
The authors would like to personally thank all the principal investigators and study coordinators for their help with subject recruitment and data collection. Special thanks go to Dr. Baraf, Dr. Covall, Dr. Kivitz, and Dr. Neustadt for their assistance in the completion of this manuscript and to Gary Stevens for his assistance with the data analysis.
Drs. Stephanie Petterson and Kevin Plancher were responsible for all aspects of manuscript development and submission.
This manuscript is based upon clinical trial results from a study sponsored by Anika Therapeutics.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Grants or other financial support were received from Anika Therapeutics.
Ethics committee approvals were obtained.
- 1.AAOS Board of Directors (2013) Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edn. http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/treatmentofOsteoarthritisoftheKneeGuideline.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2018
- 2.Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K et al (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G (2001) Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 45:384–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Campbell KA, Erickson BJ, Saltzman BM, Mascarenhas R, Bach BR Jr, Cole BJ et al (2015) Is local viscosupplementation injection clinically superior to other therapies in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 31:2036–2045 e2014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Centers for Disease C, Prevention (2009) Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults—United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58:421–426Google Scholar
- 12.Chevalier X, Jerosch J, Goupille P, van Dijk N, Luyten FP, Scott DL et al (2010) Single, intra-articular treatment with 6 ml hylan G-F 20 in patients with symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 69:113–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Greco NJ, Anderson AF, Mann BJ, Cole BJ, Farr J, Nissen CW et al (2010) Responsiveness of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med 38:891–902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J et al (2012) American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Miller LE, Block JE (2013) US-approved intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections are safe and effective in patients with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, saline-controlled trials. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 6:57–63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Pendleton A, Arden N, Dougados M, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JW et al (2000) EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 59:936–944CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Strand V, Baraf HS, Lavin PT, Lim S, Hosokawa H (2012) A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing a single intra-articular injection of Gel-200, a new cross-linked formulation of hyaluronic acid, to phosphate buffered saline for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthr Cartil 20:350–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar