Repair of only anterior talofibular ligament resulted in similar outcomes to those of repair of both anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments
- 158 Downloads
To compare the surgical outcomes of the two different ankle stabilization techniques.
This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the outcomes of the modified Broström procedure with [calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) group] or without CFL repair [anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) only group]. Of the 50 patients randomly assigned to two groups, 43 were followed up prospectively for ≥ 2 years (CFL group: 22 patients, 36.6 ± 13.1 months; ATFL Only group: 21 patients, 35.3 ± 11.9 months). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Karlsson–Peterson and Tegner activity level scoring systems. Anterior talar translation (ATT), talar tilt angle (TTA), and degrees of displacement of the calcaneus against the talus on stress radiographs were measured. All parameters were compared between the two groups. Multiple regression analysis setting the postoperative Karlsson–Peterson score as the dependent variable was performed to determine the significant variable.
There were no significant differences between the two groups in functional (Karlsson–Peterson and Tegner activity level) scores at the last follow-up and their changes. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the ATT, TTA, their differences compared with the contralateral ankles, and degrees of displacement of the calcaneus against the talus at the last follow-up. Osteochondral lesion of the talus rather than CFL repair was the significant variable related to functional outcome.
The modified Broström procedure with additional CFL repair did not result in a significant advantage in any measured outcome at 3 years.
Level of evidence
Randomized controlled trial, Level I.
KeywordsChronic lateral ankle instability Modified Broström procedure Anterior talofibular ligament Calcaneofibular ligament Karlsson–Peterson score
No external funding was used.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
- 12.Grace DL (1984) Lateral ankle ligament injuries. Inversion and anterior stress radiography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183:153–159Google Scholar
- 22.Michels F, Pereira H, Calder J, Matricali G, Glazebrook M, Guillo S, Karlsson J, Acevedo J, Batista J, Bauer T, Calder J, Carreira D, Choi W, Corte-Real N, Glazebrook M, Ghorbani A, Giza E, Guillo S, Hunt K, Karlsson J, Kong SW, Lee JW, Michels F, Molloy A, Mangone P, Matsui K, Nery C, Ozeki S, Pearce C, Pereira H, Perera A, Pijnenburg B, Raduan F, Stone J, Takao M, Tourne Y, Vega J (2018) Searching for consensus in the approach to patients with chronic lateral ankle instability: ask the expert. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2095–2102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Sarrafian SK (1993) Biomechanics of the subtalar joint complex. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:17–26Google Scholar
- 31.Shon HC, Cho BK, Kim YM, Kim DS, Choi ES, Park KJ, Park JK (2011) A comparison between the modified Brostrom procedure using single and double suture anchor for chronic lateral ankle instability. J Korean Orthop Soc Sports Med 10:69–77Google Scholar
- 32.Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49Google Scholar
- 34.Vuurberg G, Pereira H, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN (2018) Anatomic stabilization techniques provide superior results in terms of functional outcome in patients suffering from chronic ankle instability compared to non-anatomic techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2183–2195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar