Advertisement

Weight-bearing radiography depends on limb loading

  • Robert Karl Zahn
  • Lisa Renner
  • Carsten Perka
  • Hagen Hommel
Knee
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The mechanical axis of the lower limb has shown to vary between different weight-bearing conditions and change after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between mechanical axis alignment in standing long-leg radiographs and limb loading after TKA.

Methods

Mechanical axis of the lower limb and limb loading have been prospectively evaluated in 115 patients 10 days and 3 months after TKA. By the moment of standing long-leg radiography for analysis of the mechanical leg axis, two digital scales separately captured the load of each limb.

Results

Mechanical axis changed from an initial − 1° ± 2° valgus alignment to a varus axis of + 1° ± 2° (p < 0.01). This change in alignment was associated with an increase of limb loading from 89.9 ± 10.7 to 93.0 ± 7.0% (p < 0.01). The mechanical axis strongly correlated with relative limb loading at the first and second measurements (r = 0.804, p < 0.001, respectively, r = 0.562, p < 0.001). A significant change in the rate of outliers was registered within the observation period. These alterations and distinctions were much more pronounced in patients with postoperative incomplete extension (n = 15).

Conclusions

The postoperative mechanical axis correlates with limb loading. A clinical relevant change in frontal alignment of the lower limb is associated with increased limb loading after TKA. The actual mechanical axis can only be assessed at physiological limb loading in long-leg radiographs with complete extension at full weight bearing.

Level of evidence

Diagnostic study, Level II.

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty Total knee replacement Mechanical axis Limb loading Standing long-leg radiographs 

Abbreviations

BMI

Body mass index

TKA

Total knee arthroplasty

NRS

Numerical rating scale

Notes

Funding

No funding hase been received for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the competent ethical committee (AS 17 (bB)/2015).

Informed consent

A written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

References

  1. 1.
    Abane L, Anract P, Boisgard S, Descamps S, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M (2015) A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 97-B:56–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS (2014) Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J 96-B:857–862CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alnahdi AH, Zeni JA, Snyder-Mackler L (2016) Quadriceps strength asymmetry predicts loading asymmetry during sit-to-stand task in patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2587–2594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amis AA (2013) Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:197–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Bingham RJ, Ek ET, Stoney JD, Choong PF (2013) The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography. Knee 20:242–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bae DK, Lee JW, Cho SJ, Song SJ (2017) Comparison of mechanical axis and dynamic range assessed with weight bearing radiographs and navigation system in closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 29:225–231CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becker R, Kopf S, Karlsson J (2013) Loading conditions of the knee: what does it mean? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2659–2660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bowman A, Shunmugam M, Watts AR, Bramwell DC, Wilson C, Krishnan J (2016) Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of mechanical axis alignment before and after total knee arthroplasty using long leg radiographs. Knee 23:203–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Calliess T, Bauer K, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Windhagen H, Budde S, Ettinger M (2017) PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1743–1748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edwards JZ, Greene KA, Davis RS, Kovacik MW, Noe DA, Askew MJ (2004) Measuring flexion in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 19:369–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fuchs MC, Janssen RP (2015) Clinical evaluation of 292 Genesis II posterior stabilized high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: range of motion and predictors. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:161–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gbejuade HO, White P, Hassaballa M, Porteous AJ, Robinson JR, Murray JR (2013) Do long leg supine CT scanograms correlate with weight-bearing full-length radiographs to measure lower limb coronal alignment? Knee 21:549–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holme TJ, Henckel J, Hartshorn K, Cobb JP, Hart AJ (2015) Computed tomography scanogram compared to long leg radiograph for determining axial knee alignment. Acta Orthop 86:440–443CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hommel H, Perka C (2015) Gap-balancing technique combined with patient-specific instrumentation in TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:1603–1608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hopkins S, Smith C, Toms A, Brown M, Welsman J, Knapp K (2013) Evaluation of a dual-scales method to measure weight-bearing through the legs, and effects of weight-bearing inequalities on hip bone mineral density and leg lean tissue mass. J Rehabil Med 45:206–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jamali AA, Meehan JP, Moroski NM, Anderson MJ, Lamba R, Parise C (2017) Do small changes in rotation affect measurements of lower extremity limb alignment? J Orthop Surg Res 12:77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang J, Kang X, Lin Q, Teng Y, An L, Ma J et al (2015) Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 38:e305–e313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kannan A, Hawdon G, McMahon SJ (2012) Effect of flexion and rotation on measures of coronal alignment after TKA. J Knee Surg 25:407–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khare R, Jaramaz B (2017) Accuracy of leg alignment measurements from antero-posterior radiographs. Biomed Tech (Berl) 62:315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim AD, Scott RD (2016) Can the visibility of both prosthetic posterior femoral condyles on a postoperative radiograph assure that limb rotation is appropriate to allow accurate measurement of the anatomic knee axis? J Arthroplasty 31:2593–2596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kutzner I, Bender A, Dymke J, Duda G, von Roth P, Bergmann G (2017) Mediolateral force distribution at the knee joint shifts across activities and is driven by tibiofemoral alignment. Bone Joint J 99-B:779–787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lavernia C, D’Apuzzo M, Rossi MD, Lee D (2008) Accuracy of knee range of motion assessment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:85–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee DH, Park SC, Park HJ, Han SB (2016) Effect of soft tissue laxity of the knee joint on limb alignment correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3704–3712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee YS, Howell SM, Won YY, Lee OS, Lee SH, Vahedi H et al (2017) Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3467–3479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee YS, Lee BK, Lee SH, Park HG, Jun DS, Moon DH (2013) Effect of foot rotation on the mechanical axis and correlation between knee and whole leg radiographs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2542–2547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Adams JB (2014) Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant? Bone Joint J 96-B:101–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loyd BJ, Jennings JM, Falvey JR, Kim RH, Dennis DA, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2017) Magnitude of deformity correction may influence recovery of quadriceps strength after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:2730–2737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Manjunath KS, Gopalakrishna KG, Vineeth G (2015) Evaluation of alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:895–903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y (2013) Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:127–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maus U, Marques CJ, Scheunemann D, Lampe F, Lazovic D, Hommel H et al (2017) No improvement in reducing outliers in coronal axis alignment with patient-specific instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4741-1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miller EJ, Pagnano MW, Kaufman KR (2014) Tibiofemoral alignment in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: static alignment does not predict dynamic tibial plateau loading. J Orthop Res 32:1068–1074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Paley D, Pfeil J (2000) Principles of deformity correction around the knee. Orthopade 29:18–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Paternostre F, Schwab PE, Thienpont E (2014) The difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing alignment in patient-specific instrumentation planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:674–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Petterwood J, Dowsey MM, Rodda D, Choong PF (2014) The immediate post-operative radiograph is an unreliable measure of coronal plane alignment in total knee replacement. Front Surg 1:35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pfitzner T, Abdel MP, von Roth P, Perka C, Hommel H (2014) Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:2913–2922CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Radtke K, Becher C, Noll Y, Ostermeier S (2010) Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:451–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schoenmakers DAL, Feczko PZ, Boonen B, Schotanus MGM, Kort NP, Emans PJ (2017) Measurement of lower limb alignment: there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3569–3575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schroter S, Ateschrang A, Lowe W, Nakayama H, Stockle U, Ihle C (2017) Early full weight-bearing versus 6-week partial weight-bearing after open wedge high tibial osteotomy leads to earlier improvement of the clinical results: a prospective, randomised evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:325–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD (2001) The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA 286:188–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shelton TJ, Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML (2017) Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 99-B:1319–1328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shimada N, Deie M, Hirata K, Hiate Y, Orita N, Iwaki D et al (2016) Courses of change in knee adduction moment and lateral thrust differ up to 1 year after TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2506–2511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Pratt JA, McClung CD, Schmalzried TP (2003) Knee strength after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:605–611CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sim JA, Kwak JH, Yang SH, Choi ES, Lee BK (2010) Effect of weight-bearing on the alignment after open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:874–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Slevin O, Hirschmann A, Schiapparelli FF, Amsler F, Huegli RW, Hirschmann MT (2017) Neutral alignment leads to higher knee society scores after total knee arthroplasty in preoperatively non-varus patients: a prospective clinical study using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4744-y Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Slevin O, Schmid FA, Schiapparelli FF, Rasch H, Amsler F, Hirschmann MT (2017) Coronal femoral TKA position significantly influences in vivo patellar loading in unresurfaced patellae after primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3605–3610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Specogna AV, Birmingham TB, Hunt MA, Jones IC, Jenkyn TR, Fowler PJ et al (2007) Radiographic measures of knee alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: effect of weightbearing status and associations with dynamic joint load. Am J Sports Med 35:65–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stevens-Lapsley JE, Balter JE, Kohrt WM, Eckhoff DG (2010) Quadriceps and hamstrings muscle dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2460–2468CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Thomas AC, Judd DL, Davidson BS, Eckhoff DG, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2014) Quadriceps/hamstrings co-activation increases early after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21:1115–1119CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang JH, Shin JM, Kim HH, Kang SH, Lee BH (2017) Discrepancy of alignment in different weight bearing conditions before and after high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 41:85–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yaffe MA, Koo SS, Stulberg SD (2008) Radiographic and navigation measurements of TKA limb alignment do not correlate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2736–2744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zahn RK, Fussi J, von Roth P, Perka CF, Hommel H (2016) postoperative increased loading leads to an alteration in the radiological mechanical axis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:1803–1807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Karl Zahn
    • 1
    • 4
  • Lisa Renner
    • 1
  • Carsten Perka
    • 1
  • Hagen Hommel
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, CharitéUniversity Medicine BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Clinic for Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine, and RehabilitationKH-MOL GmBHWriezenGermany
  3. 3.Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical School of Brandenburg Theodor FontaneNeuruppinGermany
  4. 4.Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, CharitéUniversity Medicine BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations