Advertisement

Increased valgus laxity in flexion with greater tibial resection depth following total knee arthroplasty

  • E. Sappey-Marinier
  • N. White
  • R. Gaillard
  • L. Cheze
  • E. Servien
  • P. Neyret
  • S. Lustig
Knee
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Soft tissue balancing is of central importance to outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are lack of data analysing the effect of tibial bone cut thickness on valgus laxity. A cadaveric study was undertaken to assess the biomechanical consequences of tibial resection depth on through range knee joint valgus stability. We aimed to establish a maximum tibial resection depth, beyond which medial collateral ligament balancing becomes challenging, and a constrained implant should be considered.

Methods

Eleven cadaveric specimens were included for analysis. The biomechanical effects of increasing tibial resection were studied, with bone cuts made at 6, 10, 14, 18 and 24 mm from the lateral tibial articular surface. A computer navigation system was used to perform the tibial resection and to measure the valgus laxity resulting from a torque of 10 Nm. Measurements were taken in four knee positions: 0° or extension, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion. Intra-observer reliability was assessed. A minimum sample size of eight cadavers was necessary. Statistical analysis was performed using a nonparametric Spearman’s ranking correlation matrix at the different stages: in extension, at 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

There was no macroscopic injury to the dMCL or sMCL in any of the specimens during tibial resection. There was no significant correlation found between the degree of valgus laxity and the thickness of the tibial cut with the knee in extension. There was a statistically significant correlation between valgus laxity and the thickness of the tibial cut in all other knee flexion positions: 30° (p < 0.0001), 60° (p < 0.001) and 90° (p < 0.0001). We identified greater than 5° of valgus laxity, at 90° of knee flexion, after a tibial resection of 14 mm.

Conclusion

Increased tibial resection depth is associated with significantly greater valgus laxity when tested in positions from 30° to 90° of flexion, despite stability in extension. Greater than 5° of laxity was identified with a tibial resection of 14 mm. When a tibial bone cut of 14 mm or greater is necessary, as may occur with severe preoperative coronal plane deformity, it is recommended to consider the use of a constrained knee prosthesis.

Keywords

Tibial bone cut Total knee arthroplasty Medial collateral ligament Knee stability Total knee replacement Resection depth 

Notes

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Rockefeller anatomy laboratory, Grange Blanche, Lyon, France.

References

  1. 1.
    Athwal KK, Daou HE, Kittl C, Davies AJ, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2016) The superficial medial collateral ligament is the primary medial restraint to knee laxity after cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: effects of implant type and partial release. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(8):2646–2655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Athwal KK, El Daou H, Inderhaug E, Manning W, Davies AJ, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2017) An in vitro analysis of medial structures and a medial soft tissue reconstruction in a constrained condylar total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(8):2646–2656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Châtain F, Gaillard TH, Denjean S, Tayot O (2013) Outcomes of 447 SCORE® highly congruent mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties after 5–10 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(6):681–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czekaj J, Fary C, Gaillard T, Lustig S (2017) Does low-constraint mobile bearing knee prosthesis give satisfactory results for severe coronal deformities? A five to twelve year follow up study. Int Orthop 41(7):1369–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deep K (2014) Collateral ligament laxity in knees: what is normal? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(11):3426–3431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Girard J, Amzallag M, Pasquier G, Mulliez A, Brosset T, Gougeon F, Duhamel A, Migaud H (2009) Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees: predictive preoperative parameters influencing a constrained design selection. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(4):260–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iizawa N, Mori A, Majima T, Kawaji H, Matsui S, Takai S (2016) Influence of the medial knee structures on valgus and rotatory stability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(3):688–693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    LaPrade RF, Engebretsen AH, Ly TV, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L (2007) The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(9):2000–2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Muratsu H, Matsushita T, Ishida K, Kawakami Y, Oka S, Matsuzaki T, Kuroda Y, Nishida K, Akisue T, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2013) Different pattern in gap balancing between the cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2338–2345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kawakami Y, Takayama K, Ishida K, Matsushita T, Akisue T, Nishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2014) Soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty: cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilised, and measured-resection versus gap technique. Int Orthop 38(3):531–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naudie DD, Rorabeck CH (2004) Managing instability in total knee arthroplasty with constrained and linked implants. Instr Course Lect 53:207–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okada R, Tsunoda A, Momiyama N, Kishine N, Kitamura K, Kishimoto S, Akita K (2012) Thiel’s method of embalming and its usefulness in surgical assessments. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 115(8):791–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peltier A, Lording T, Maubisson L, Ballis R, Neyret P, Lustig S (2015) The role of the meniscotibial ligament in posteromedial rotational knee stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(10):2967–2973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ren D, Liu Y, Zhang X, Song Z, Lu J, Wang P (2017) The evaluation of the role of medial collateral ligament maintaining knee stability by a finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 12(1):64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson JR, Bull AMJ, Thomas RRD, Amis AA (2006) The role of the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial capsule in controlling knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 34(11):1815–1823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sasanuma H, Sekiya H, Takatoku K, Takada H, Sugimoto N (2010) Evaluation of soft-tissue balance during total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18(1):26–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsubosaka M, Muratsu H, Takayama K, Miya H, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T (2018) Comparison of intraoperative soft tissue balance between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty performed by a newly developed medial preserving gap technique. J Arthroplast 33(3):729–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Völlner F, Pilsl U, Craiovan B, Zeman F, Schneider M, Wörner M, Grifka J, Weber M (2017) Stability of knee ligament complex of Thiel-embalmed cadaver compared to in vivo knee. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 71:392–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wierer G, Runer A, Hoser C, Gföller P, Fink C (2016) Anatomical MCL reconstruction following TKA. Knee 23(5):911–914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Sappey-Marinier
    • 1
  • N. White
    • 1
  • R. Gaillard
    • 2
  • L. Cheze
    • 2
  • E. Servien
    • 1
  • P. Neyret
    • 1
  • S. Lustig
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre Albert Trillat, Orthopaedic SurgeryCroix-Rousse HospitalLyonFrance
  2. 2.Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations