Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 12, pp 3667–3672 | Cite as

In-vivo three-dimensional MR imaging of the intact anterior cruciate ligament shows a variable insertion pattern of the femoral and tibial footprints

  • S. U. SchefflerEmail author
  • K. Maschewski
  • R. Becker
  • P. Asbach
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Failure to reconstruct the natural footprints of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) may lead to premature graft-failure. Therefore, precise analyses of insertion site anatomy and inter-individual variations of the morphology of the ACL are highly important to facilitate optimal individualized graft placement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the inter-individual variation of the morphology of the femoral and tibial ACL footprints.

Methods

Thirty subjects with an intact ACL were included in this study for MR imaging of their knee joint. A three-dimensional (3D) dual-echo steady-state sequence with near 0.8 mm isotropic resolution was acquired on a 3 T system with a 15-channel knee-coil. The ACL was subsequently manually segmented using dedicated medical imaging software (VitreaAdvanced®, Vital Images). The lengths and widths of the footprints were measured after reconstructing an axial oblique (tibial footprint) or coronal oblique (femoral footprint) section at the bone–ligament junction and descriptive analysis was conducted to describe morphology orientation of the footprint.

Results

The femoral footprint measured on average 14 mm ± 2 mm (range 8–19 mm) in length and 5 mm ± 1 mm (range 3–8 mm) in width. The mean value of the tibial footprint measured 10 mm ± 2 mm (range 5–14 mm) in length and 7 mm ± 2 mm (range 5–13 mm) in width. Descriptive analysis showed a stretched, ribbon-like appearance of the femoral footprint, while the tibial footprint revealed larger variability, stretching from anterolateral to posteromedial around the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus.

Conclusion

3D imaging of the ACL footprints reveals a distinct difference in insertion site morphology and fiber bundle orientation between the femoral and tibial footprint. This questions the concept of strict anatomical separation of the ACL into an anteromedial and posterolateral bundle.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament 3D MRI Footprint Anatomy 

Notes

Funding

No external source of funding was used.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this study.

Ethical approval

This study received IRB approval by the Charité, University Medicine Berlin with the ID number EA4/084/13.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Amis AA, Dawkins GP (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:260–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araki D, Thorhauer E, Tashman S (2017) Three-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging can provide a reliable estimate of the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion site anatomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 37:1904Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boisgard S, Levai JP, Geiger B, Saidane K, Landjerit B (1999) Study of the variations in length of the anterior cruciate ligament during flexion of the knee: use of a 3D model reconstructed from MRI sections. Surg Radiol Anat 21:313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi J-P, Djian P, Bellier G, Sbihi A (2006) Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy 22:984–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dong Y, Mou Z, Huang Z, Hu G, Dong Y, Xu Q (2013) Three-dimensional reconstruction of subject-specific knee joint using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging image data fusions. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 227(10):1083–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: Part 1: tibial attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1414–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edwards A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2008) The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 2: femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferretti M, Doca D, Ingham SM, Cohen M, Fu FH (2011) Bony and soft tissue landmarks of the ACL tibial insertion site: an anatomical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hohmann E (2017) Editorial Commentary: The ribbon theory. Another quantum leap? The anterior cruciate ligament is twisted and in fact a flat structure. Or not? Arthroscopy 33:1710–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hui C, Pi Y, Swami V, Mabee M, Jaremko JL (2016) A validation study of a novel 3-dimensional MRI modeling technique to identify the anatomic insertions of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med 4:2325967116673797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Irarrázaval S, Albers M, Chao T, Fu FH (2017) Gross, arthroscopic, and radiographic anatomies of the anterior cruciate ligament: foundations for anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Sports Med 36:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iriuchishima T, Ryu K, Aizawa S, Fu FH (2015) Proportional evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint size and knee bony morphology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3157–3162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iwahashi T, Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Yamada Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K (2008) Assessment of the “functional length” of the three bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Middleton KK, Muller B, Araujo PH, Fujimaki Y, Rabuck SJ, Irrgang JJ, Tashman S, Fu FH (2015) Is the native ACL insertion site “completely restored” using an individualized approach to single-bundle ACL-R? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2145–2150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noailles T, Boisrenoult P, Sanchez M, Beaufils P, Pujol N (2017) Torsional appearance of the anterior cruciate ligament explaining “Ribbon” and double-bundle concepts: a cadaver-based study. Arthroscopy 33:1703–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pass B, Robinson P, Hodgson R, Grainger AJ (2015) Can a single isotropic 3D fast spin echo sequence replace three-plane standard proton density fat-saturated knee MRI at 1.5 T? Br J Radiol 88:20150189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Li G, Fu FH (1997) In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res 15:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siebold R, Schuhmacher P, Fernandez F, Śmigielski R, Fink C, Brehmer A, Kirsch J (2015) Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial “C-”shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3136–3142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swami VG, Cheng-Baron J, Hui C, Thompson RB, Jaremko JL (2015) Reliability of 3D localisation of ACL attachments on MRI: comparison using multi-planar 2D versus high-resolution 3D base sequences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1206–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Śmigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Łysoń B, Siebold R (2015) Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3143–3150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SporthopaedicumBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Zentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg (MHB)Brandenburg an der HavelGermany

Personalised recommendations