Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 648–654 | Cite as

Nationwide study highlights a second peak in ACL tears for women in their early forties

  • Micah NichollsEmail author
  • Thor Aspelund
  • Thorvaldur Ingvarsson
  • Kristin Briem
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture continues to be a focus of research on knee injuries. Despite this, data on the total number of ruptures on a national basis including both reconstructed (ACLR) and non-reconstructed injuries are limited. The purpose of this study was to describe the national incidence of MRI diagnosed ACL ruptures in Iceland and its subsequent rate of operation with regard to sex and age.

Methods

All MRI knee reports taken in Iceland between 2006 and 2011 were gathered to identify ACL ruptures. Software was written to search for phrases relating to ACL rupture. Duplicate records were removed and yearly incidence for sex and age groups was determined. Data from the Icelandic Social Insurance Administration were used identify all those who were operated and to determine the yearly incidence of ACLR. General additive models were used assuming either a Poisson or binomial distribution to model ACL rupture incidence and ACLR rate, respectively.

Results

The average age was 33.9 (95% CI 33.1–34.6; Table 1). The average incidence of ACL tears per year was 75.1 (95% CI 71.3–79.1) per 100,000 person-years. For males the peak incidence was in their early twenties. Females showed two peaks, one in their teens and another in their forties resulting in an older average age at rupture compared to males (35 ± 16 vs 33 ± 13, p = 0.06). The main effects of age and sex and their interaction were significant (p < 0.001). The average incidence of ACLR was 39.4 (95% CI 36.7–42.4) per 100,000 person-years. Those operated were significantly younger than those who were not (27 ± 10 vs 42 ± 15 years, p < 0.001). The main effects of age and the interaction between sex and age were significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This nationwide study indicates that ACL rupture incidence may be higher than previously thought, implying an underestimated impact of the burden of this serious knee injury. The incidence of injury peaked twice in the female population, a result not previously reported. Older persons are less likely to undergo ACLR and, therefore, sex-dependent differences in overall mean age at injury are contrary to previous reports. These data suggest that prevention programs focused solely on young girls should be extended to older women who are returning to sports.

Level of evidence

II.

Keywords

ACL tear ACL reconstruction ACL Epidemiology Incidence 

Abbreviations

ACL

Anterior cruciate ligament

ACLR

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

OA

Osteoarthritis

GAM

Generalized additive model

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Vishal Kalia and Dr Vibhuti Kalia for their help in this project.

Author contributions

MN, TI and KB conceived and designed the study, collected the data and classified the reports. MN and TA analysed the data. MN wrote the initial manuscript. All authors contributed in revising the manuscript and gave their final approval of the submitted version.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahldén M, Samuelsson K, Sernert N, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Kartus J (2012) The Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med 40:2230–2235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajuied A, Wong F, Smith C, Norris M, Earnshaw P, Back D, Davies A (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament injury and radiologic progression of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 42:2242–2252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belmont PJ Jr, Shawen SB, Mason KT, Sladicka SJ (1999) Incidence and outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction among US Army aviators. Aviat Space Environ Med 70:316–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frobell RB, Lohmander LS, Roos HP (2007) Acute rotational trauma to the knee: poor agreement between clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:109–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frobell RB, Roos HP, Roos EM, Roemer FW, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS (2013) Treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tear: five year outcome of randomised trial. BMJ 346:f232CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L (2009) Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport Sports Med Aust 12:622–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gillquist J, Messner K (1999) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the long-term incidence of gonarthrosis. Sports Med Auck NZ 27:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Granan L-P, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2008) Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian national knee ligament registry. Am J Sports Med 36:308–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Granan L-P, Forssblad M, Lind M, Engebretsen L (2009) The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004–2007: baseline epidemiology. Acta Orthop 80:563–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jameson SS, Dowen D, James P, Serrano-Pedraza I, Reed MR, Deehan D (2012) Complications following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the English NHS. Knee 19:14–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janssen KW, Orchard JW, Driscoll TR, van Mechelen W (2012) High incidence and costs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed in Australia from 2003–2004 to 2007–2008: time for an anterior cruciate ligament register by Scandinavian model? Scand J Med Sci Sports 22:495–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2009) The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:117–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM (2007) The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 35:1756–1769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mall NA, Chalmers PN, Moric M, Tanaka MJ, Cole BJ, Bach BR, Paletta GA (2014) Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med 42:2363–2370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mather RC, Hettrich CM, Dunn WR, Cole BJ, Bach BR, Huston LJ, Reinke EK, Spindler KP, Koenig L, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Kaeding CK, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wright RW (2014) Cost-effectiveness analysis of early reconstruction versus rehabilitation and delayed reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament tears. Am J Sports Med 42:1583–1591CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mather RC, Koenig L, Kocher MS, Dall TM, Gallo P, Scott DJ, Bach BR, Spindler KP (2013) Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J B Jt Surg Am 95:1751–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Owens BD, Mountcastle SB, Dunn WR, DeBerardino TM, Taylor DC (2007) Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury among active duty US military servicemen and servicewomen. Mil Med 172:90–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peat G, Bergknut C, Frobell R, Jöud A, Englund M (2014) Population-wide incidence estimates for soft tissue knee injuries presenting to healthcare in southern Sweden: data from the Skåne healthcare register. Arthr Res Ther 16:R162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phelan N, Rowland P, Galvin R, O’Byrne JM (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for suspected ACL and meniscal tears of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 24:1525–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Lind MC, Pedersen AB (2013) Validation of 14,500 operated knees registered in the Danish knee ligament reconstruction register: registration completeness and validity of key variables. Clin Epidemiol 5:219–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ (2016) Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med 44:1502–1507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suter LG, Smith SR, Katz JN, Englund M, Hunter DJ, Frobell R, Losina E (2017) Projecting lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and total knee replacement in individuals sustaining a complete anterior cruciate ligament tear in early adulthood. Arthr Care Res 69:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thompson S, Salmon L, Waller A, Linklater J, Roe J, Pinczewski L (2015) Twenty-year outcomes of a longitudinal prospective evaluation of isolated endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 43:2164–2174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Research Centre for Movement SciencesUniversity of IcelandReykjavíkIceland
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine, The Centre of Public Health SciencesUniversity of IcelandReykjavíkIceland
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of AkureyriAkureyriIceland

Personalised recommendations