Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is effective in strengthening the quadriceps muscle after anterior cruciate ligament surgery
- 3.1k Downloads
Reduced ability to contract the quadriceps muscles is often found immediately following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. This can lead to muscle atrophy and decreased function. Application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be a useful adjunct intervention to ameliorate these deficits following ACL surgery. The purpose of this review was to determine whether NMES in addition to standard physical therapy is superior to standard physical therapy alone in improving quadriceps strength or physical function following ACL surgery.
A computer-assisted literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials where patients after ACL surgery received NMES with the outcome of muscle strength and/or physical function. Random effect models were used to pool summary estimates using standardized mean differences (SMD) for strength outcomes. Physical function outcomes were assessed qualitatively. Methodological quality was assessed from the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)-score.
Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria; results from six of these were pooled in the meta-analysis showing a statistically significant short-term effect of NMES (4–12 weeks) after surgery compared to standard physical therapy [SMD = 0.73 (95% CI 0.29, 1.16)]. Physical function also improved significantly more in the NMES groups. PEDro scores ranged from 3/10 to 7/10 points.
NMES in addition to standard physical therapy appears to significantly improve quadriceps strength and physical function in the early post-operative period compared to standard physical therapy alone.
Level of evidence
KeywordsACL NMES Physical therapy Muscle strength Quadriceps
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors of this article have no conflicts of interest on the matter presented.
The study has not recieved any outside funding.
No ethical approval has been necessary since sensitive information has not been provided or utilized in this review.
- 2.Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2014) Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med 33(21):1543–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Draper V, Lyle L, Seymour T (1997) From the Field-EMG biofeedback versus electrical stimulation in the recovery of quadriceps surface EMG. Clin Kinesiol 51:28–32Google Scholar
- 13.Feil S, Newell J, Minogue C, Paessler HH (2011) The effectiveness of supplementing a standard rehabilitation program with superimposed neuromuscular electrical stimulation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Am J Sports Med 39(6):1238–1247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hasegawa S, Kobayashi M, Arai R, Tamaki A, Nakamura T, Moritani T (2011) Effect of early implementation of electrical muscle stimulation to prevent muscle atrophy and weakness in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 21(4):622–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lentz TA, Zeppieri G Jr, Tillman SM, Indelicato PA, Moser MW, George SZ, Chmielewski TL (2012) Return to preinjury sports participation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: contributions of demographic, knee impairment, and self-report measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42(11):893–901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Low J, Reen A (2000) Electrotherapy explained: principles and practice. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 70–76Google Scholar
- 33.PEDro. PEDro, Physiotherapy Evidence Database. 2016 04.04.2016 [cited 2016 04.22.2016]; http://www.pedro.org.au/english/faq/#question_five
- 34.Ross M (2000) The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation during closed kinetic chain exercise on lower extremity performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Res Sports Med 9(4):239–251Google Scholar
- 37.Snyder-Mackler L, Ladin Z, Schepsis AA, Young JC (1991) Electrical stimulation of the thigh muscles after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Effects of electrically elicited contraction of the quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscles on gait and on strength of the thigh muscles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(7):1025–1036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Bailey SL, Stralka SW (1995) Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(8):1166–1173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Taradaj J, Halski T, Kucharzewski M, Walewicz K, Smykla A, Ozon M, Pasternok M (2013) The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength and knee function in professional soccer players: return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Biomed Res Int 2013:802534. doi: 10.1155/2013/802534 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Thomeé R, Kvist J (2015) Structured Rehabilitation Model with Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. In: Doral MN, Karlsson J (eds) Sports injuries. Springer, Berlin, pp 1439–1465Google Scholar
- 43.Wright RW, Preston E, Fleming B, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Bergfeld JA, Dunn WR, Kaeding C, Kuhn JE, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Parker RC, Spindler KP, Wolcott M, Wolf BR, Williams GN (2008) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: part II: open versus closed kinetic chain exercises, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, accelerated rehabilitation, and miscellaneous topics. J Knee Surg 21(3):225–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar