Shoulder manual muscle resistance test cannot fully detect muscle weakness
- 617 Downloads
The shoulder manual resistance test is one of the common clinical assessments for patients with muscle weakness. However, there have been no studies investigating the threshold for muscle weakness. The purpose of this study was to clarify the threshold for muscle weakness in the shoulder manual muscle resistance test.
Fifty-three patients (37.9 ± 20.6 years old) with either rotator cuff tear (21 patients), superior labrum anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesion (7 patients), or Bankart lesion (25 patients) of one shoulder were administered three manual muscle resistance tests (abduction strength, external rotation, and belly press tests). Positive results in these tests were defined as a subjective weakness in the involved shoulder compared to the opposite shoulder. Based on this result, the patients were divided into positive and negative groups. Another observer measured isometric strength using a hand-held dynamometer and calculated the side-to-side ratio. Comparing instrument measurement with manual measurement, the cut-off point, at which we can recognise that there is a side-to-side difference, was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
The cases with less than 60% of the muscle strength in the contralateral shoulder were judged as positive in all examinations, whereas among the cases with 60–90% of muscle strength, there was a mixture of negative and positive determinations. The cut-off point was 78.9% in the abduction strength test, 73.8% in the external rotation test, and 84.0% in the belly press test.
The side-to-side difference could be manually detected, when muscle strength was less than 75–85% of that on the contralateral side. This finding suggests that it is necessary to understand the limitation of these manual tests in the case of clinical examinations. Therefore, care must be taken for the shoulder manual muscle resistance test as muscle weakness cannot be fully detected by manual measurement.
Level of evidence
Case–control study, Level IV.
KeywordsAbduction strength test External rotation test Belly press test Rotator cuff tear Muscle weakness Cut-off point
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All of the authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
All authors, their immediate family, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated did not receive any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Osaka Kosei-nenkin Hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 9.Hegedus EJ, Goode AP, Cook CE, Michener L, Myer CA, Myer DM, Wright AA (2012) Which physical examination tests provide clinicians with the most value when examining the shoulder? Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med 46:964–978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kessel L, Watoson M (1977) The painful arc syndrome. Clinical classification as a guide to management. J Bone Jt Surg Br 59(2):166–172Google Scholar
- 14.Kronberg M, Németh G, Broström LA (1990) Muscle activity and coordination in the normal shoulder. An electromyographic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:76–85Google Scholar
- 22.Park HB, Yokota A, Gill HS, El Rassi G, McFarland EG (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(7):1446–1455Google Scholar