Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 2081–2088 | Cite as

Shoulder manual muscle resistance test cannot fully detect muscle weakness

  • Takayuki Nagatomi
  • Tatsuo Mae
  • Teruyoshi Nagafuchi
  • Shin-ichi Yamada
  • Koutatsu Nagai
  • Minoru Yoneda
Shoulder

Abstract

Purpose

The shoulder manual resistance test is one of the common clinical assessments for patients with muscle weakness. However, there have been no studies investigating the threshold for muscle weakness. The purpose of this study was to clarify the threshold for muscle weakness in the shoulder manual muscle resistance test.

Methods

Fifty-three patients (37.9 ± 20.6 years old) with either rotator cuff tear (21 patients), superior labrum anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesion (7 patients), or Bankart lesion (25 patients) of one shoulder were administered three manual muscle resistance tests (abduction strength, external rotation, and belly press tests). Positive results in these tests were defined as a subjective weakness in the involved shoulder compared to the opposite shoulder. Based on this result, the patients were divided into positive and negative groups. Another observer measured isometric strength using a hand-held dynamometer and calculated the side-to-side ratio. Comparing instrument measurement with manual measurement, the cut-off point, at which we can recognise that there is a side-to-side difference, was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results

The cases with less than 60% of the muscle strength in the contralateral shoulder were judged as positive in all examinations, whereas among the cases with 60–90% of muscle strength, there was a mixture of negative and positive determinations. The cut-off point was 78.9% in the abduction strength test, 73.8% in the external rotation test, and 84.0% in the belly press test.

Conclusion

The side-to-side difference could be manually detected, when muscle strength was less than 75–85% of that on the contralateral side. This finding suggests that it is necessary to understand the limitation of these manual tests in the case of clinical examinations. Therefore, care must be taken for the shoulder manual muscle resistance test as muscle weakness cannot be fully detected by manual measurement.

Level of evidence

Case–control study, Level IV.

Keywords

Abduction strength test External rotation test Belly press test Rotator cuff tear Muscle weakness Cut-off point 

References

  1. 1.
    Barth JR, Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2006) The bear-hug test: a new and sensitive test for diagnosing a subscapularis tear. Arthroscopy 22(10):1076–1084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batalha NM, Raimundo AM, Tomas-Carus P, Barbosa TM, Silva AJ (2013) Shoulder rotator cuff balance, strength, and endurance in young swimmers during a competitive season. J Strength Cond Res 27(9):2562–2568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beasley WC (1956) Influence of method on estimates of normal knee extensor force among normal and post polio children. Phys Ther Rev 36(1):21–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bohannon RW (1997) Discriminant construct validity of hand-held dynamometry and manual muscle testing in a home care setting. J Phys Ther Sci 9:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calis M, Akgün K, Birtane M, Karacan I, Caliş H, Tüzün F (2000) Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 59(1):44–47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerber C, Hersche O, Farron A (1996) Isolated rupture of the subscapularis tendon. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78(7):1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golebiewska JA, Mastalerz A, Zieliński JR (2008) Isokinetic muscle torque during glenohumeral rotation in dominant and nondominant limbs. Acta Bioeng Biomech 10(2):69–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hawkins RJ, Kennedy JC (1980) Impingement syndrome in athletes. Am J Sports Med 8(3):151–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hegedus EJ, Goode AP, Cook CE, Michener L, Myer CA, Myer DM, Wright AA (2012) Which physical examination tests provide clinicians with the most value when examining the shoulder? Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med 46:964–978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Itoi E, Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Seki N, Abe H (2006) Are pain location and physical examinations useful in locating a tear site of the rotator cuff? Am J Sports Med 34(2):256–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kessel L, Watoson M (1977) The painful arc syndrome. Clinical classification as a guide to management. J Bone Jt Surg Br 59(2):166–172Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim E, Jeong HJ, Lee KW, Song JS (2006) Interpreting positive signs of the supraspinatus test in screening for torn rotator cuff. Acta Med Okayama 60(4):223–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Konrad GG, Jolly JT, Labriola JE, McMahon PJ, Debski RE (2006) Thoracohumeral muscle activity alters glenohumeral joint biomechanics during active abduction. J Orthop Res 24(4):748–756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kronberg M, Németh G, Broström LA (1990) Muscle activity and coordination in the normal shoulder. An electromyographic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:76–85Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuechle DK, Newman SR, Itoi E, Niebur GL, Morrey BF, An KN (2000) The relevance of the moment arm of shoulder muscles with respect to axial rotation of the glenohumeral joint in four positions. Clin Biomech 15(5):322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Labriola JE, Lee TQ, Debski RE, McMahon PJ (2005) Stability and instability of the glenohumeral joint: the role of shoulder muscles. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14:32S–38SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leggin BG, Neuman RM, Iannotti JP, Williams GR, Thompson EC (1996) Intrarater and interrater reliability of three isometric dynamometers in assessing shoulder strength. J Shoulder Elb Surg 5(1):18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leroux JL, Thomas E, Bonnel F, Blotman F (1995) Diagnostic value of clinical tests for shoulder impingement syndrome. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 62(6):423–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malanga GA, Jenp YN, Growney ES, An KN (1996) EMG analysis of shoulder positioning in testing and strengthening the supraspinatus. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28(6):661–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mall NA, Kim HM, Keener JD, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Stobbs G, Yamaguchi K (2010) Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(16):2623–2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murrell GA, Walton JR (2001) Diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Lancet 357:769–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park HB, Yokota A, Gill HS, El Rassi G, McFarland EG (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(7):1446–1455Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perry J, Weiss WB, Burnfield JM, Gronley JK (2004) The supine hip extensor manual muscle test: a reliability and validity study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(8):1345–1350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pollard H, Lakay B, Tucker F, Watson B, Bablis P (2005) Interexaminer reliability of the deltoid and psoas muscle test. J Manip Physiol Ther 28(1):52–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Orton B, Tran T, Faber KJ, Drosdowech D, Athwal GS (2009) The concurrent validity of a hand-held versus a stationary dynamometer in testing isometric shoulder strength. J Hand Ther 22(4):320–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharkey NA, Marder RA (1995) The rotator cuff opposes superior translation of the humeral head. Am J Sports Med 23(3):270–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tokish JM, Decker MJ, Ellis HB, Torry MR, Hawkins RJ (2003) The belly-press test for the physical examination of the subscapularis muscle: electromyographic validation and comparison to the lift-off test. J Shoulder Elb Surg 12(5):427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turner N, Ferguson K, Mobley BW, Riemann B, Davies G (2009) Establishing normative data on scapulothoracic musculature using handheld dynamometry. J Sport Rehabil 18:502–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takayuki Nagatomi
    • 1
  • Tatsuo Mae
    • 2
  • Teruyoshi Nagafuchi
    • 1
  • Shin-ichi Yamada
    • 3
  • Koutatsu Nagai
    • 4
  • Minoru Yoneda
    • 5
  1. 1.RehabilitationJCHO Osaka HospitalOsaka CityJapan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineSuitaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryJCHO Hoshigaoka Medical CenterHirakataJapan
  4. 4.Department of Physical TherapyHyogo University of Health SciencesKobeJapan
  5. 5.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations