Estimation of anterior glenoid bone loss area using the ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid rim to the centre of the glenoid
Estimation of anterior glenoid bone loss is important for surgical decision-making. The purpose of this study was to describe a method for estimating anterior glenoid bone loss.
Thirty-nine cadaveric glenoids were digitized to obtain glenoid geometry. Glenoid bare spot centre, arthroscopic centre, and centre of the inferior glenoid circle relative to the geometric centre were measured. To simulate anterior glenoid bone loss, imaginary sequential osteotomies were created 0°, 22.5°, and 45° to the superior–inferior line in a 3D digitizing programme. Per cent of anterior glenoid bone loss area was calculated as the percentage of defect area relative to the entire area of the glenoid. The relationship between area loss and ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid to various centres was determined.
As the ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid to all three centres increased, the per cent area of bone loss increased exponentially. The ratio using the inferior circle centre and arthroscopic centre was highly correlated to the actual glenoid bone loss in all osteotomies (R 2 > 0.90). The ratio using the centre of bare area had the lowest correlation. The ratio of defect length to distance from posterior glenoid to arthroscopic centre greater than 2.4 for 0° and 2.0 for 45° osteotomies results in bone loss area greater than 25 %. The bare area centre had the largest variation. Average bone loss was overestimated when the centre of bare spot was used compared to other centre locations.
Per cent of anterior glenoid bone loss can be estimated using the ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid rim to the centre of inferior glenoid circle or arthroscopic centre either preoperatively using 3D CT or arthroscopically which can be useful for determining surgical treatment.
KeywordsGlenoid bone loss Instability Cadaver study Bony defect
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Grant sponsor: National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF); Grant number: NRF-2013RIAIA2008601. Partial funding provided by VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Merit Review, California Orthopaedic Research Institute and the John C. Griswold Foundation. The funding source did not play a role in the investigation.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 12.Huijsmans PE, de Witte PB, de Villiers RV, Wolterbeek DW, Warmerdam P, Kruger NR, de Beer JF (2011) Recurrent anterior shoulder instability: accuracy of estimations of glenoid bone loss with computed tomography is insufficient for therapeutic decision-making. Skelet Radiol 40(10):1329–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kubicka AM, Stefaniak J, Lubiatowski P, Dlugosz J, Dzianach M, Redman M, Piontek J, Romanowski L (2016) Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3253-9 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Maqdes A, Chammai Y, Lengert R, Klouche S, Clavert P, Hardy P, Kempf JF (2014) The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the CT-scan based X index to quantify glenoid bone loss in chronic anterior shoulder instability and its impact on decision making. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:699–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Pavlov H, Warren RF, Weiss CB Jr, Dines DM (1985) The roentgenographic evaluation of anterior shoulder instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 194:153–158Google Scholar
- 23.Provencher MT, Bhatia S, Ghodadra NS, Grumet RC, Bach BR Jr, Dewing CB, LeClere L, Romeo AA (2010) Recurrent shoulder instability: current concepts for evaluation and management of glenoid bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(Suppl):2133–2151Google Scholar
- 24.Provencher MT, Detterline AJ, Ghodadra N, Romeo AA, Bach BR Jr, Cole BJ, Verma N (2008) Measurement of glenoid bone loss: a comparison of measurement error between 45 degrees and 0 degrees bone loss models and with different posterior arthroscopy portal locations. Am J Sports Med 36(6):1132–1138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar