An evaluation of the effectiveness of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an anatomical tunnel site
- 522 Downloads
Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability has gained popularity, and anatomical and biomechanical studies have recently altered our operative techniques. The aim of this study was to report the clinical outcome of this new anatomical MPFL reconstructive technique and investigate whether correlating factors could be identified.
Between 2009 and 2012, a total of 31 consecutive patients underwent MPFL reconstruction using an autologous gracilis graft and anatomical tunnel placement. Pre- and post-operative data were collected as a part of routine clinical practice. The preoperative assessment included a rotational profile CT scan of the lower extremity according to the Lyon protocol with TT–TG distance measurement. Outcomes were evaluated with the Kujala and Norwich patella instability (NPI) scores preoperatively and at follow-up (1.5–5.1 years).
A significant improvement in both the Kujala (p < 0.001) and NPI (p = 0.012) scores was recorded. A medium and large negative correlations were found between TT–TG distance and Kujala score improvement (ρ = −0.48, p = 0.020) and NPI score improvement (ρ = −0.83, p = 0.042), respectively. Multiple regression analysis identified TT–TG distance, Beighton score and BMI as factors explaining the variance of Kujala score improvement.
Anatomical MPFL reconstruction with the gracilis autograft for patellar instability resulted in good outcome. This underlines the importance of anatomical tunnel placement in MPFL reconstruction. With a precise preoperative work-up, factors can be identified that may guide selecting the optimal operative strategy and improve counselling of the patient.
Level of evidence
Case series, Level IV.
KeywordsKnee Patella Instability Medial patellofemoral ligament Kujala score Norwich Patella instability score TT–TG Beighton score
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Kars P Valkering, Aysha Rajeev, Nick Caplan, Wim E Tuinebreijer, Deiary F Kader declare that they have no conflict of interest.
There is no funding source.
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
- 1.Balcarek P, Jung K, Ammon J, Walde TA, Frosch S, Schuttrumpf JP, Sturmer KM, Frosch KH (2010) Anatomy of lateral patellar instability: trochlear dysplasia and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance is more pronounced in women who dislocate the patella. Am J Sports Med 38:2320–2327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- 22.Indrayan A (2008) Medical biostatistics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lorbach O, Haupert A, Efe T, Pizanis A, Weyers I, Kohn D, Kieb M (2016) Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4005-5
- 30.Peacock J, Kerry S (2007) Presenting medical statistics from proposal to publication. A step-by-step guide, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 43.Stupay KL, Swart E, Shubin Stein BE (2015) Widespread implementation of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability maintains functional outcomes at midterm to long-term follow-up while decreasing complication rates: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:1372–1380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar