Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 159–164 | Cite as

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale into Turkish

  • Gulcan HarputEmail author
  • Damla Tok
  • Burak Ulusoy
  • Leyla Eraslan
  • Taha Ibrahim Yildiz
  • Elif Turgut
  • Serdar Demirci
  • Irem Duzgun
  • Volga Bayrakci Tunay
  • Gul Baltaci
  • Nevin Ergun
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

To translate and culturally adapt the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale into Turkish (ACL-RSI-Tr) and examine and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version in individuals who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

The ACL-RSI was forward- and back-translated, culturally adapted and validated on ninety-three Turkish individuals who had undergone ACL reconstruction (5 females, 88 males; age 28.7 ± 8.6 years; body mass 80.1 ± 13.9 kg; height 178.8 ± 6.9 cm; body mass index 25.0 ± 3.7 kg/m2). All patients completed the translated ACL-RSI, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentary Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm questionnaires. We then analysed the internal consistency, reliability and validity of the newly formed ACL-RSI-Tr scale.

Results

The ACL-RSI-Tr showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.86) and test–retest reliability (ICC 0.92) and was significantly correlated with the KOOS ‘quality of life’ (r = 0.58, p < 0.002), ‘symptoms and stiffness’ (r = 0.35, p = 0.001), ‘pain’ (r = 0.49, p < 0.001), ‘sports’ (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) and ‘daily life’ (r = 0.42, p < 0.001) subscales. The ACL-RSI-Tr also correlated significantly with the TSK (r = − 0.45, p < 0.001), Lysholm (r = 0.45, p < 0.001) and IKDC (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) scores.

Conclusions

The Turkish version of the ACL-RSI scale was valid, discriminant, consistent and reliable in patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction. This score could be useful to evaluate the effect of psychological factors on return to sport following ACL surgery.

Level of evidence

Diagnostic study, Level I.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament Knee joint Patient-reported outcomes Return to sport 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Derya Celik for valuable advice in methodology and reporting of data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, Sebille V, Hardouin JB (2014) Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Fear of re-injury in people who have returned to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Sci Med Sport 15(6):488–495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE (2013) Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1549–1558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR (2011) Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(12):1697–1705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohu Y, Klouche S, Lefevre N, Webster K, Herman S (2015) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(4):1192–1196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Celik D, Coşkunsu D, Kiliçoğlu O (2013) Translation and cultural adaptation of the Turkish Lysholm knee scale: ease of use, validity, and reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(8):2602–2610CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Çelik D, Coşkunsu D, KiliÇoğlu Ö, Ergönül Ö, Irrgang JJ (2014) Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form into Turkish. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44(11):899–909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Everhart JS, Best TM, Flanigan DC (2015) Psychological predictors of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(3):752–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kori S, Miller R, Todd D (1990) Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag 3(1):35–43Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L (2005) Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(5):393–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kvist J, Osterberg A, Gauffin H, Tagesson S, Webster K, Ardern C (2013) Translation and measurement properties of the Swedish version of ACL-return to sports after injury questionnaire. Scand J Med Sci Sports 23(5):568–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lentz TA, Zeppieri G Jr, Tillman SM, Indelicato PA, Moser MW, George SZ, Chmielewski TL (2012) Return to preinjury sports participation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: contributions of demographic, knee impairment, and self-report measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42(11):893–901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Logerstedt D, Di Stasi S, Grindem H, Lynch A, Eitzen I, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2014) Self-reported knee function can identify athletes who fail return-to-activity criteria up to 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a delaware-oslo ACL cohort study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44(12):914–923CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF (2003) A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 56(8):730–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muller U, Kruger-Franke M, Schmidt M, Rosemeyer B (2015) Predictive parameters for return to pre-injury level of sport 6 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(12):3623–3631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paker N, Budayci D, Sabirli F, Ozel S, Ersoy S (2007) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: reliability and validation of the Turkish version. Turk Klin Tip Bilim 27(3):350–356Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(2):88–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Slagers AJ, Reininga IH, van den Akker-Scheek I (2016) The Dutch language anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI)—validity and reliability. J Sports Sci 15:1–9Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tripp DA, Stanish W, Ebel-Lam A, Brewer BW, Birchard J (2007) Fear of reinjury, negative affect and catastrophizing predicting return to sport in recreational athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injuries at 1 year postsurgery. Rehabil Psychol 52:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Grinsven S, van Cingel RE, Holla CJ, van Loon CJ (2010) Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1128–1144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C (2008) Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport 9(1):9–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yilmaz O, Yakut Y, Uygur F, Ulug N (2011) Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 22(1):44–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gulcan Harput
    • 1
    Email author
  • Damla Tok
    • 1
  • Burak Ulusoy
    • 1
  • Leyla Eraslan
    • 1
  • Taha Ibrahim Yildiz
    • 1
  • Elif Turgut
    • 1
  • Serdar Demirci
    • 1
  • Irem Duzgun
    • 1
  • Volga Bayrakci Tunay
    • 1
  • Gul Baltaci
    • 2
  • Nevin Ergun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health SciencesHacettepe UniversitySamanpazari, AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Ankara Private Guven HospitalAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations