Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 3596–3604 | Cite as

Changes in hindfoot alignment after total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritic patients with varus deformity

  • Woo-Shin Cho
  • Hun-Sik Cho
  • Seong-Eun ByunEmail author
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Hindfoot alignment can affect the weight-bearing kinematics of the knee joint in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated the change in hindfoot alignment after TKA by prospectively analysing the correlation between the knee joint and the hindfoot deformity, the post-operative improvement in the hindfoot deformity, and the long-term post-operative changes in hindfoot alignment.

Methods

This study included 195 knees from 117 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent TKA between 2012 and 2013. The mechanical alignment angle of the knee joint and the hindfoot alignment angle were measured preoperatively and 6 weeks, 1, and 2 years post-operatively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of the preoperative knee joint deformity: <10° varus (group 1, N = 81) and ≥10° varus (group 2, N = 114). The preoperative and post-operative radiologic parameters of the axis of the knee joint and hindfoot were evaluated, and the results were compared. A Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the differences in both the mechanical alignment and the hindfoot alignment pre- and post-operatively.

Results

After TKA, the hindfoot valgus deformity improved from 5.2° (±3.8) valgus to 2.1° (±3.9) valgus. At 6 weeks post-operatively, the hindfoot alignment angle was 1.4° (±3.5) valgus and 2.5° (±4.1) valgus in group 1 and group 2, respectively; the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Hindfoot alignment showed greater valgus with increasing varus of the mechanical alignment of the knee joint preoperatively (−0.484, p < 0.001) and post-operatively (−0.147, p = 0.040). The post-operative 1- and 2-year hindfoot alignment angles were 2.2° (±4.2) valgus and 2.2° (±4.1) valgus, respectively. None of the differences between the post-operative hindfoot alignment angles were statistically significant.

Conclusions

The stable improvement in the hindfoot deformity after TKA demonstrates that a valgus deformity of the hindfoot in a patient with a varus knee joint deformity does not require preoperative correction. In patients with a residual hindfoot deformity and pain 6 weeks after TKA, active treatment should be considered because no further improvement can be expected.

Level of evidence

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty Hindfoot alignment Hindfoot valgus Varus deformity Mechanical alignment 

References

  1. 1.
    Bae DK, Song SJ, Park MJ, Eoh JH, Song JH, Park CH (2012) Twenty-year survival analysis in total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon. J Arthroplasty 27:1297.e1–1304.e1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ (2007) The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:893–900CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:178–183Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:261–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award. Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients?: the concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA (2008) Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2756–2762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buck FM, Hoffmann A, Mamisch-Saupe N, Espinosa N, Resnick D, Hodler J (2011) Hindfoot alignment measurements: rotation-stability of measurement techniques on hindfoot alignment view and long axial view radiographs. Am J Roentgenol 197:578–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chandler JT, Moskal JT (2004) Evaluation of knee and hindfoot alignment before and after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective analysis. J Arthroplasty 19:211–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1995) The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1713–1720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Lima DD, Hermida JC, Chen PC, Colwell CW (2001) Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Desai SS, Shetty GM, Song HR, Lee SH, Kim TY, Hur CY (2007) Effect of foot deformity on conventional mechanical axis deviation and ground mechanical axis deviation during single leg stance and two leg stance in genu varum. Knee 14:452–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Emmerson KP, Moran CG, Pinder IM (1996) Survivorship analysis of the kinematic stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:441–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:156–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24:39–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frigg A, Nigg B, Hinz L, Valderrabano V, Russell I (2010) Clinical relevance of hindfoot alignment view in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 31:871–879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hara Y, Ikoma K, Arai Y, Ohashi S, Maki M, Kubo T (2015) Alteration of hindfoot alignment after total knee arthroplasty using a novel hindfoot alignment view. J Arthroplasty 30:126–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24:570–578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matziolis G (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:236–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mullaji A, Shetty GM (2011) Persistent hindfoot valgus causes lateral deviation of weightbearing axis after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1154–1160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Norton AA, Callaghan JJ, Amendola A, Phisitkul P, Wongsak S, Liu SS, Fruehling-Wall C (2015) Correlation of knee and hindfoot deformities in advanced knee OA: compensatory hindfoot alignment and where it occurs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:166–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Okamoto Y, Otsuki S, Jotoku T, Nakajima M, Neo M (2016) Clinical usefulness of hindfoot assessment for total knee arthroplasty: persistent post-operative hindfoot pain and alignment in pre-existing severe knee deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4122-1 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP (2001) Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS (2001) Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saltzman CL, El-Khoury GY (1995) The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int 16:572–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Song M-H, Yoo S-H, Kang S-W, Kim Y-J, Park G-T, Pyeun Y-S (2015) Coronal Alignment of the lower limb and the incidence of constitutional varus knee in korean females materials and methods. Knee Surg Relat Res 27:49–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Srivastava A, Lee GY, Steklov N, Colwell CW, Ezzet KA, D’Lima DD (2012) Effect of tibial component varus on wear in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 19:560–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Takenaka T, Ikoma K, Ohashi S, Arai Y, Hara Y, Ueshima K, Sawada K, Shirai T, Fujiwara H, Kubo T (2015) Hindfoot alignment at one year after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3916-x PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of MedicineUniversity of UlsanSeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNamkise Spine and Joint HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, School of MedicineCHA UniversitySeongnam-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations