Advertisement

A modified technique to reduce tibial keel cutting errors during an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

  • Hiroshi InuiEmail author
  • Shuji Taketomi
  • Keitarou Tahara
  • Ryota Yamagami
  • Takaki Sanada
  • Sakae Tanaka
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Bone cutting errors can cause malalignment of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA). Although the extent of tibial malalignment due to horizontal cutting errors has been well reported, there is a lack of studies evaluating malalignment as a consequence of keel cutting errors, particularly in the Oxford UKA. The purpose of this study was to examine keel cutting errors during Oxford UKA placement using a navigation system and to clarify whether two different tibial keel cutting techniques would have different error rates.

Methods

The alignment of the tibial cut surface after a horizontal osteotomy and the surface of the tibial trial component was measured with a navigation system. Cutting error was defined as the angular difference between these measurements. The following two techniques were used: the standard “pushing” technique in 83 patients (group P) and a modified “dolphin” technique in 41 patients (group D).

Results

In all 123 patients studied, the mean absolute keel cutting error was 1.7° and 1.4° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. In group P, there were 22 outlier patients (27 %) in the coronal plane and 13 (16 %) in the sagittal plane. Group D had three outlier patients (8 %) in the coronal plane and none (0 %) in the sagittal plane. Significant differences were observed in the outlier ratio of these techniques in both the sagittal (P = 0.014) and coronal (P = 0.008) planes.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated overall keel cutting errors of 1.7° in the coronal plane and 1.4° in the sagittal plane. The “dolphin” technique was found to significantly reduce keel cutting errors on the tibial side. This technique will be useful for accurate component positioning and therefore improve the longevity of Oxford UKAs.

Level of evidence

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Keywords

Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Tibial alignment Keel cutting error Computer-assisted navigation system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Edanz Editing Global (http://www.edanzediting.co.jp/) for the English language review.

References

  1. 1.
    Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Grifka J (2005) Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125(1):16–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chua KH, Chen Y, Lingaraj K (2014) Navigated total knee arthroplasty: is it error-free? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(3):643–649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dao Trong ML, Diezi C, Goerres G, Helmy N (2015) Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(7):1993–1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emerson RH Jr (2007) Preoperative and postoperative limb alignment after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30(5 Suppl.):32–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gulati A, Chau R, Simpson DJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 16(3):196–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ishida K, Shibanuma N, Matsumoto T, Sasaki H, Takayama K, Toda A, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2015) Factors affecting intraoperative kinematic pattern and flexion angles in navigated total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(6):1741–1747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Inui H, Taketomi S, Nakamura K, Takei S, Takeda H, Tanaka S, Nakagawa T (2013) Influence of navigation system updates on total knee arthroplasty. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-5-10 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inui H, Taketomi S, Yamagami R, Sanada T, Tanaka S (2016) Twice cutting method reduces tibial cutting error in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 23(1):173–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Chung BJ, Cho HJ, Seong SC (2010) Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Knee 17(1):23–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DS (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2):198–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, McGraw RW (2002) Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(6):698–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):174–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA (2002) The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(3):351–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tashiro Y, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Mizu-uchi H, Kuwashima U, Iwamoto Y (2014) The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(12):3142–4149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW (1991) Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(4):582–586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yau WP, Chiu KY (2008) Cutting errors in total knee replacement: assessment by computer assisted surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(7):670–673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Inui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shuji Taketomi
    • 1
  • Keitarou Tahara
    • 1
  • Ryota Yamagami
    • 1
  • Takaki Sanada
    • 1
  • Sakae Tanaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations