Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1697–1704 | Cite as

Proprioception after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty is comparable to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

  • Florian Baumann
  • Özkan Bahadin
  • Werner Krutsch
  • Johannes Zellner
  • Michael Nerlich
  • Peter Angele
  • Carsten Oliver Tibesku
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Rising expectations in functional performance of total knee joints are inciting further improvement of knee arthroplasty implants. From a patient-centred view, bicruciate-retaining models provide a more natural feeling knee. However, there is no evidence of functional advantage for these implants. The aim of this study was to evaluate balance ability as a measure of proprioception in patients with a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

A prospective, controlled trial was conducted to compare balance ability in 60 patients after arthroplasty of the knee for osteoarthritis. We compared patients with a bicruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty (BCR group) to a control group of patients with a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA group) and another control group of patients with a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS group). The patient population comprised 30 women (50.0 %) and 30 men in three cohorts of 20 each. The mean age was 62.1 ± 8.0 years (range 43–78). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 9 months post-operatively. The evaluation included clinical, radiological, and balance testing—a single-leg stance with eyes closed compared to eyes open. The difference in area of sway between eyes closed and eyes open represents static balance ability after knee arthroplasty.

Results

Perioperative data showed that there was no intra-operative fracture of the intercondylar eminence. There was a decreased post-operative knee extension 9 months post-operative in the BCR group, which was not clinically relevant in any case. We recorded a lower difference in the area of sway between eyes closed and eyes open (ΔA (ec–eo)) for the BCR group (p = 0.01) and the UKA group (p = 0.04) compared to the PS group.

Conclusions

This study found superior static balance ability after preservation of both cruciate ligaments in arthroplasty of the knee, indicating superior proprioceptive function. Hence, BCR implants could provide improved functional properties. Superior proprioceptive function of bicruciate-retaining implants can be an important factor in implant selection. Further prospective, randomized studies to investigate kinematics and long-term survivorship of bicruciate-retaining implants are needed.

Level of evidence

II.

Keywords

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) Outcome Proprioception 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Amiri S, Wilson DR (2012) A computational modeling approach for investigating soft tissue balancing in bicruciate retaining knee arthroplasty. Comput Math Methods Med 2012:652865CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bascuas I, Tejero M, Monleon S, Boza R, Muniesa JM, Belmonte R (2013) Balance 1 year after TKA: correlation with clinical variables. Orthopedics 36(1):e6–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boissonneault A, Pandit H, Pegg E, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Dodd CA, Gibbons CL, Murray DW (2013) No difference in survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without an intact anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2480–2486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cherian JJ, Kapadia BH, Banerjee S, Jauregui JJ, Harwin SF, Mont MA (2014) Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg 27(3):199–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cloutier JM (1983) Results of total knee arthroplasty with a non-constrained prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(7):906–919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A (1999) Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments. A 9 to 11-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(5):697–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fuchs S, Frisse D, Laass H, Thorwesten L, Tibesku CO (2004) Muscle strength in patients with unicompartmental arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83(8):650–654; quiz 655–657, 662Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuchs S, Frisse D, Tibesku CO, Laass H, Rosenbaum D (2002) Proprioceptive function, clinical results, and quality of life after unicondylar sledge prostheses. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81(7):478–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Frisse D, Genkinger M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D (2005) Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(3):197–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Genkinger M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D (2003) Proprioception with bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Genkinger M, Volmer M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D (2004) Clinical and functional comparison of bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining all ligaments and constrained total knee replacement. Clin Biomech 19(3):263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goutallier D, Manicom O, Van Driessche S (2008) Total knee arthroplasty with bicruciate preservation: comparison versus the same posterostabilized design at 8 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 94(6):585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson AJ, Howell SM, Costa CR, Mont MA (2013) The ACL in the arthritic knee: how often is it present and can preoperative tests predict its presence? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):181–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Komistek RD, Allain J, Anderson DT, Dennis DA, Goutallier D (2002) In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lombardi AV (2015) The bi-cruciate retaining TKA: “a thing of beauty is ajoy forever”—affirms. Bone Joint J Suppl 97-B(SUPP 1):69Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lyons MC, MacDonald SJ, Somerville LE, Naudie DD, McCalden RW (2012) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):84–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matthews DJ, Hossain FS, Patel S, Haddad FS (2013) A cohort study predicts better functional outcomes and equivalent patient satisfaction following UKR compared with TKR. HSS J 9(1):21–24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moro-oka TA, Muenchinger M, Canciani JP, Banks SA (2007) Comparing in vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(1):93–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nowakowski AM, Stangel M, Grupp TM, Valderrabano V (2012) Investigating the primary stability of the transversal support tibial plateau concept to retain both cruciate ligaments during total knee arthroplasty. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 10(2):127–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pritchett JW (2004) Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(7):979–982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pritchett JW (2011) Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplast 26(2):224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pritchett JW (2015) Bicruciate-retaining total knee replacement provides satisfactory function and implant survivorship at 23 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(7):2327–2333CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Relph N, Herrington L, Tyson S (2014) The effects of ACL injury on knee proprioception: a meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 100(3):187–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sabouret P, Lavoie F, Cloutier JM (2013) Total knee replacement with retention of both cruciate ligaments: a 22-year follow-up study. Bone Joint J 95-B(7):917–922CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schultz RA, Miller DC, Kerr CS, Micheli L (1984) Mechanoreceptors in human cruciate ligaments. A histological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(7):1072–1076CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schwartz I, Kandel L, Sajina A, Litinezki D, Herman A, Mattan Y (2012) Balance is an important predictive factor for quality of life and function after primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(6):782–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA (2000) The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15(5):545–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V (1976) Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 4(2):84–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vahtrik D, Ereline J, Gapeyeva H, Paasuke M (2014) Postural stability in relation to anthropometric and functional characteristics in women with knee osteoarthritis following total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(5):685–692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vandekerckhove PJ, Parys R, Tampere T, Linden P, Van den Daelen L, Verdonk PC (2015) Does cruciate retention primary total knee arthroplasty affect proprioception, strength and clinical outcome? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(6):1644–1652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Verra WC, van den Boom LG, Jacobs W, Clement DJ, Wymenga AA, Nelissen RG (2013) Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD004803Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ward TR, Burns AW, Gillespie MJ, Scarvell JM, Smith PN (2011) Bicruciate-stabilised total knee replacements produce more normal sagittal plane kinematics than posterior-stabilised designs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(7):907–913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zouita Ben Moussa A, Zouita S, Dziri C, Ben Salah FZ (2009) Single-leg assessment of postural stability and knee functional outcome 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 52(6):475–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Baumann
    • 1
  • Özkan Bahadin
    • 2
  • Werner Krutsch
    • 1
  • Johannes Zellner
    • 1
  • Michael Nerlich
    • 1
  • Peter Angele
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carsten Oliver Tibesku
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Trauma SurgeryRegensburg University Medical CenterRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Sporthopaedicum RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  3. 3.Sporthopaedicum StraubingStraubingGermany

Personalised recommendations