Advertisement

Anatomical “C”-shaped double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in pre-adolescent children with open growth plates

  • Rainer Siebold
  • Tsuyoshi Takada
  • Sven Feil
  • Carmen Dietrich
  • Shaun K. Stinton
  • Thomas P. Branch
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

To analyse the clinical, rotational and radiological (MRI) results of paediatric anatomical “C-shaped” double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with anteromedial and posteromedial bundle compared to single-bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Between 2008 and 2014, 57 consecutive patients received a paediatric ACL reconstruction with open physis and were allocated into two groups, according to the surgical procedure. Transepiphyseal SB technique was used until 2012 and DB consecutively thereafter. Follow-up consisted of a clinical evaluation with assessment of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation, VAS Scores for satisfaction, MRI and testing of rotational stability using a robotic system.

Results

The mean time from ACL reconstruction to follow-up was 48.1 ± 15.8 in the SB group (n = 17) and 23.1 ± 13.2 in the DB group (n = 16; p < 0.001). No differences were found in the subjective scores. Biomechanically, there were significant differences identified in the KT-1000 (p < 0.03) and total tibial axial rotation (p < 0.04) when evaluating the reconstructed knee only. Ten of 17 (59 %) of the SB patients had a Joint Play Area within the acceptable range of the median healthy knee value compared to 100 % in the DB group. Decreased patient satisfaction was associated with increased total tibial axial rotation. No growth disturbance was observed. Overall, 98 % of patients were reached and either examined or interviewed. Re-rupture rate was 3 of 21 (14.3 %) for DB and 9 of 35 (25.7 %) for SB. All but one re-ruptures (92 %) happened in the first 16 postoperative months independent of technique.

Conclusions

The re-rupture rate after pre-adolescent ACL reconstruction is too high both historically and in this mixed cohort. Anatomical transepiphyseal DB ACL reconstruction with open physis may result in a reduction in this re-rupture rate, which may be related to a tighter control of the Joint Play Area. While subjective clinical results were similar between SB and DB, decreased patient satisfaction was associated with increased total tibial axial rotation in the entire cohort. Despite the need for two transepiphyseal tunnels in the DB technique, there did not appear to be an increased risk in growth plate disturbance. Transepiphyseal DB ACL reconstruction appears to be a reasonable alternative to current techniques in pre-adolescent children with an ACL rupture.

Level of evidence

IV.

Keywords

ACL reconstruction Open physis Double bundle Single bundle Anteromedial bundle Posteromedial bundle Internal rotation Children Adolescents RKT 

References

  1. 1.
    Aichroth PM, Patel DV, Zorrilla P (2002) The natural history and treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in children and adolescents. A prospective review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:38–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Hadithy N, Dodds AL, Akhtar KS, Gupte CM (2013) Current concepts of the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in children. Bone Joint J 95:1562–1569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Behr CT, Potter HG, Paletta GA Jr (2001) The relationship of the femoral origin of the anterior cruciate ligament and the distal femoral physeal plate in the skeletally immature knee. An anatomic study. Am J Sports Med 29:781–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Branch T, Lavoie F, Guier C, Branch E, Lording T, Stinton S, Neyret P (2015) Single-bundle ACL reconstruction with and without extra-articular reconstruction: evaluation with robotic lower leg rotation testing and patient satisfaction scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2882–2891PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Branch T, Stinton S, Sternberg M, Hutton W, Lavoie F, Guier C, Neyret P (2015) Robotic axial lower leg testing: repeatability and reproducibility. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2892–2899PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Branch TP, Browne JE, Campbell JD, Siebold R, Freedberg HI, Arendt EA, Lavoie F, Neyret P, Jacobs CA (2010) Rotational laxity greater in patients with contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury than healthy volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1379–1384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Branch TP, Siebold R, Freedberg HI, Jacobs CA (2011) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:432–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calvo R, Figueroa D, Gili F, Vaisman A, Mococain P, Espinosa M, Leon A, Arellano S (2015) Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes: 10-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 43:289–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen M, Ferretti M, Quarteiro M, Marcondes FB, de Hollanda JP, Amaro JT, Abdalla RJ (2009) Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes. Arthroscopy 25:831–838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Courvoisier A, Grimaldi M, Plaweski S (2011) Good surgical outcome of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients using four-strand hamstring graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:588–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dodwell ER, Lamont LE, Green DW, Pan TJ, Marx RG, Lyman S (2014) 20 years of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in New York State. Am J Sports Med 42:675–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fabricant PD, Jones KJ, Delos D, Cordasco FA, Marx RG, Pearle AD, Warren RF, Green DW (2013) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the skeletally immature athlete: a review of current concepts: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frosch KH, Stengel D, Brodhun T, Stietencron I, Holsten D, Jung C, Reister D, Voigt C, Niemeyer P, Maier M, Hertel P, Jagodzinski M, Lill H (2010) Outcomes and risks of operative treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in children and adolescents. Arthroscopy 26:1539–1550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hawkins RJ, Misamore GW, Merritt TR (1986) Followup of the acute nonoperated isolated anterior cruciate ligament tear. Am J Sports Med 14:205–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henry J, Chotel F, Chouteau J, Fessy MH, Berard J, Moyen B (2009) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in children: early reconstruction with open physes or delayed reconstruction to skeletal maturity? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:748–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hui C, Roe J, Ferguson D, Waller A, Salmon L, Pinczewski L (2012) Outcome of anatomic transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Tanner stage 1 and 2 patients with open physes. Am J Sports Med 40:1093–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Irvine GB, Glasgow MM (1992) The natural history of the meniscus in anterior cruciate insufficiency. Arthroscopic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:403–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Janarv PM, Nystrom A, Werner S, Hirsch G (1996) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients. J Pediatr Orthop 16:673–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Janarv PM, Wikstrom B, Hirsch G (1998) The influence of transphyseal drilling and tendon grafting on bone growth: an experimental study in the rabbit. J Pediatr Orthop 18:149–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jarvela T, Jarvela S (2013) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 32:81–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kannus P, Jarvinen M (1988) Knee ligament injuries in adolescents. Eight year follow-up of conservative management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:772–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kercher J, Xerogeanes J, Tannenbaum A, Al-Hakim R, Black JC, Zhao J (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature: an anatomical study utilizing 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstructions. J Pediatr Orthop 29:124–129PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kocher MS, Smith JT, Zoric BJ, Lee B, Micheli LJ (2007) Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature pubescent adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2632–2639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar S, Ahearne D, Hunt DM (2013) Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature: follow-up to a minimum of sixteen years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lawrence JT, Argawal N, Ganley TJ (2011) Degeneration of the knee joint in skeletally immature patients with a diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament tear: is there harm in delay of treatment? Am J Sports Med 39:2582–2587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Makela EA, Vainionpaa S, Vihtonen K, Mero M, Rokkanen P (1988) The effect of trauma to the lower femoral epiphyseal plate. An experimental study in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:187–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mastrangelo AN, Haus BM, Vavken P, Palmer MP, Machan JT, Murray MM (2010) Immature animals have higher cellular density in the healing anterior cruciate ligament than adolescent or adult animals. J Orthop Res 28:1100–1106PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mizuta H, Kubota K, Shiraishi M, Otsuka Y, Nagamoto N, Takagi K (1995) The conservative treatment of complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:890–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mochizuki T, Nimura A, Yasuda K, Muneta T, Akita K (2014) Anatomic and histological analysis of the midsubstance and fanlike extension fibers of the ACL. In: Siebold R, Dejour D, Zaffagnini S (eds) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA (2012) The current evidence for treatment of ACL injuries in children is low: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1112–1119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA (2012) Management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42:172–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Seil R (2015) The ESSKA paediatric anterior cruciate ligament monitoring initiative. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3746-x Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Redler LH, Brafman RT, Trentacosta N, Ahmad CS (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with transphyseal tunnels. Arthroscopy 28:1710–1717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salzmann GM, Spang JT, Imhoff AB (2009) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a skeletally immature adolescent athlete. Arthroscopy 25:321–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2009) Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med 37:471–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Siebold R (2014) “Ribbonlike” double-bundle ACL reconstruction with restoration of “C”-shaped tibial insertion site. In: Siebold R, Dejour D, Zaffagnini S (eds) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Springer, Berlin, pp 291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Siebold R (2015) Flat ACL anatomy: fact no fiction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3133–3135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Siebold R, Branch TP, Freedberg HI, Jacobs CA (2011) A matched pairs comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, clinical results and manual laxity testing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:S4–S11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Siebold R, Schuhmacher P, Fernandez F, Smigielski R, Fink C, Brehmer A, Kirsch J (2015) Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial “C”-shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3136–3142PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Siebold R, Śmigielski R (2014) Arthroscopic appearance of the “C”-shaped insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament. In: Siebold R, Dejour D, Zaffagnini S (eds) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwiega M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Lyson B, Siebold R (2015) Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3143–3150PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Śmigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Siebold R (2014) Ribbonlike anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament from its femoral insertion to the midsubstance. In: Siebold R, Dejour D, Zaffagnini S (eds) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Suomalainen P, Jarvela T, Paakkala A, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2012) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 5-year results. Am J Sports Med 40:1511–1518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vavken P, Murray MM (2011) Treating anterior cruciate ligament tears in skeletally immature patients. Arthroscopy 27:704–716PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ziebarth K, Kolp D, Kohl S, Slongo T (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in children and adolescents: a review of the recent literature. Eur J Pediatr Surg 23:464–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer Siebold
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tsuyoshi Takada
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sven Feil
    • 2
  • Carmen Dietrich
    • 2
  • Shaun K. Stinton
    • 4
  • Thomas P. Branch
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Institute for Anatomy and Cell BiologyRuprecht-Karls-UniversityHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.HKF – International Center for Hip, Knee and Foot Surgery and Sports TraumatologyATOS Klinik HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  4. 4.University OrthopedicsAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.University OrthopedicsDecaturUSA
  6. 6.Morehouse CollegeUniversity OrthopedicsAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations