Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 2502–2510 | Cite as

Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft

  • Olaf Lorbach
  • Alexander Haupert
  • Turgay Efe
  • Antonius Pizanis
  • Imke Weyers
  • Dieter Kohn
  • Matthias Kieb
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the knee kinematics of the intact, MPFL-ruptured and MPFL-reconstructed knee and, moreover, to compare dynamic patellofemoral contact pressure of the gracilis tendon and the fascia lata as an alternative graft option for reconstruction of the MPFL.

Methods

Eight paired human cadaveric knees were fixed in a custom-made fixation device. Patellofemoral contact pressure was assessed during a dynamic flexion movement at 15°–30°–45°–60°–75° and 90° using a pressure-sensitive film (Tekscan). The medial patellofemoral ligament was cut, and measurements were repeated. Finally, reconstruction of the MPFL was performed using the gracilis tendon (group I) or a fascia lata graft (group II). Tunnel localization was performed under fluoroscopic control. Grafts were fixed at 30° of flexion, and pressure measurements were repeated.

Results

Incision of the medial patellofemoral ligament significantly reduced patellofemoral contact pressure at 15°, 30° and 45° of knee flexion compared to the intact knee (p < 0.05), whereas reconstruction of the MPFL using either gracilis tendon of the fascia lata was able to restore pressure distributions at 15° and 30° of knee flexion. However, in the hamstring group, reconstruction of the MPFL revealed a significantly reduced contact pressure at 45° of flexion (p = 0.038) compared to the intact knee. In the fascia lata group, a significant reduction in patellofemoral contact pressure was observed after MPFL reconstruction at 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL with either a gracilis or a fascia lata graft showed comparable patellofemoral pressure distributions which were closely restored compared to the native knee. Therefore, the fascia lata has shown to be a viable alternative to the gracilis tendon for reconstruction of the MPFL. However, anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL may lead to persistently altered patellofemoral contact pressure during knee flexion compared to the native knee independent of the tested graft.

Keywords

MPFL Patellofemoral Knee kinematics Biomechanical Patella 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Becher C, Kley K, Lobenhoffer P, Ezechieli M, Smith T, Ostermeier S (2014) Dynamic versus static reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2452–2457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belvedere C, Catani F, Ensini A, Moctezuma de la Barrera JL, Leardini A (2007) Patellar tracking during total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro feasibility study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:985–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berruto M, Ferrua P, Uboldi F, Usellini E, Gala L, Tassi A, Marelli B (2014) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with bioactive synthetic ligament is an option. A 3-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2419–2425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bicos J, Fulkerson JP, Amis A (2007) Current concepts review: the medial patellofemoral ligament. Am J Sports Med 35:484–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brimacombe JM, Wilson DR, Hodgson AJ, Ho KC, Anglin C (2009) Effect of calibration method on Tekscan sensor accuracy. J Biomech Eng 131:034503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brunet ME, Brinker MR, Cook SD, Christakis P, Fong B, Patron L, O’Connor DP (2003) Patellar tracking during simulated quadriceps contraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ (2006) Technical errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage: a computational analysis. Am J Sports Med 34:1478–1485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feller JA, Amis AA, Andrish JT, Arendt EA, Erasmus PJ, Powers CM (2007) Surgical biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint. Arthroscopy 23:542–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haupert A, Lorbach O (2015) Anatomic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using the fascia lata as an autograft. Arthrosc Tech 4:e57–e63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang HJ, Cao JH, Pan S, Wang XJ, Yu DH, Zheng ZM (2014) The horizontal Y-shaped graft with respective graft tension angles in anatomical two-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2445–2451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lippacher S, Dreyhaupt J, Williams SR, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2014) Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: clinical outcomes and return to sports. Am J Sports Med 42:1661–1668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matic GT, Magnussen RA, Kolovich GP, Flanigan DC (2014) Return to activity after medial patellofemoral ligament repair or reconstruction. Arthroscopy 30:1018–1025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ntagiopoulos PG, Sharma B, Bignozzi S, Lopomo N, Colle F, Zaffagnini S, Dejour D (2013) Are the tubular grafts in the femoral tunnel in an anatomical or isometric position in the reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament? Int Orthop 37:1933–1941CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ostermeier S, Holst M, Bohnsack M, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ (2007) Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral contact pressure following reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: an in vitro study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Papannagari R, Gill TJ, DeFrate LE, Moses JM, Petruska AJ, Li G (2006) In vivo kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and functional evaluation. Am J Sports Med 34:2006–2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parikh SN, Nathan ST, Wall EJ, Eismann EA (2013) Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in young patients. Am J Sports Med 41:1030–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Philippot R, Chouteau J, Wegrzyn J, Testa R, Fessy MH, Moyen B (2009) Medial patellofemoral ligament anatomy: implications for its surgical reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:475–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sanchis-Alfonso V, Ramirez-Fuentes C, Montesinos-Berry E, Parisi-Rodriguez F, Marti-Bonmati L (2015) Does radiographic location ensure precise anatomic location of the femoral fixation site in medial patellofemoral ligament surgery? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3523-x Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schottle PB, Hensler D, Imhoff AB (2010) Anatomical double-bundle MPFL reconstruction with an aperture fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:147–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schottle PB, Schmeling A, Rosenstiel N, Weiler A (2007) Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:801–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Senavongse W, Amis AA (2005) The effects of articular, retinacular, or muscular deficiencies on patellofemoral joint stability: a biomechanical study in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:577–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shah JN, Howard JS, Flanigan DC, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Lattermann C (2012) A systematic review of complications and failures associated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 40:1916–1923CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singhal R, Rogers S, Charalambous CP (2013) Double-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft and mediolateral patellar tunnel fixation: a meta-analysis of outcomes and complications. Bone Joint J 95-B:900–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stephen JM, Kader D, Lumpaopong P, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2013) Sectioning the medial patellofemoral ligament alters patellofemoral joint kinematics and contact mechanics. J Orthop Res 31:1423–1429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stephen JM, Lumpaopong P, Deehan DJ, Kader D, Amis AA (2012) The medial patellofemoral ligament: location of femoral attachment and length change patterns resulting from anatomic and nonanatomic attachments. Am J Sports Med 40:1871–1879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang CH, Ma LF, Zhou JW, Ji G, Wang HY, Wang F, Wang J (2013) Double-bundle anatomical versus single-bundle isometric medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar dislocation. Int Orthop 37:617–624CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilharm A, Hurschler C, Dermitas T, Bohnsack M (2013) Use of Tekscan K-scan sensors for retropatellar pressure measurement avoiding errors during implantation and the effects of shear forces on the measurement precision. Biomed Res Int 2013:829171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Witonski D, Keska R, Synder M, Sibinski M (2013) An isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Biomed Res Int 2013:637678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wylie JD, Burks RT (2013) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus autograft. Arthrosc Tech 2:e417–e421CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yildiz KI, Isik C, Tecimel O, Cay N, Firat A, Akmese R, Bozkurt M (2013) Use of contact pressure-sensitive surfaces as an indicator of graft tension in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:1657–1663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zaffagnini S, Colle F, Lopomo N, Sharma B, Bignozzi S, Dejour D, Marcacci M (2013) The influence of medial patellofemoral ligament on patellofemoral joint kinematics and patellar stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2164–2171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, Bonanzinga T, Marcacci M (2014) Minimally invasive medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with fascia lata allograft: surgical technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2426–2430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olaf Lorbach
    • 1
  • Alexander Haupert
    • 1
  • Turgay Efe
    • 2
  • Antonius Pizanis
    • 3
  • Imke Weyers
    • 4
  • Dieter Kohn
    • 1
  • Matthias Kieb
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgerySaarland UniversityHomburg (Saar)Germany
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMarburg UniversityMarburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of Trauma-Hand and Reconstructive SurgerySaarland UniversityHomburg (Saar)Germany
  4. 4.Institute of AnatomyLübeck UniversityLübeckGermany
  5. 5.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryKlinikum Ernst von BergmannPotsdam/Bad BelzigGermany

Personalised recommendations