Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 1200–1216 | Cite as

Classification and diagnosis of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines

  • C. Niek van Dijk
  • Umile Giuseppe Longo
  • Mattia Loppini
  • Pino Florio
  • Ludovica Maltese
  • Mauro Ciuffreda
  • Vincenzo Denaro
Ankle
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the current classification systems, and the clinical and radiological tests for the acute isolated syndesmotic injuries to identify the best method of classification and diagnosis allowing the surgeon to choose the appropriate management.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines has been performed. A comprehensive search using various combinations of the keywords “classification”, “grading system”, “ankle injury”, “ligament”, “syndesmotic injury”, “internal fixation”, “acute”, “synostosis”, “ligamentoplasties”, “clinical”, “radiological” over the years 1962–2015 was performed. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE and Ovid.

Results

The literature search resulted in 345 references for classification systems and 308 references for diagnosis methods, of which 283 and 295 were rejected due to off-topic abstract and/or failure to fulfil the inclusion criteria. After reading the remaining full-text articles, we included 27 articles describing classification systems and 13 articles describing diagnostic tests for acute isolated syndesmotic injuries.

Conclusions

The ESSKA-AFAS consensus panel recommends distinguishing acute isolated syndesmotic injury as stable or unstable. Stable injuries should be treated non-operatively with a short-leg cast or brace, while unstable injuries should be managed operatively. The recommended clinical tests include: tenderness on palpation over the anterior tibiofibular ligament, the fibular translation test and the Cotton test. Radiographic imaging must include an AP view and a mortise view of the syndesmosis to check the tibiofibular clear space, medial clear space overlap, tibial width and fibular width.

Level of evidence

IV.

Keywords

Syndesmotic injury Acute Classification systems Diagnosis Imaging Clinical tests 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the following members of the ESSKA-AFAS consensus committee for their contribution: Gino Kerkhoffs, James Calder, John Kennedy, Akos Kynsburg, Tahir Ogut, Beat Hintermann, Milan Handl, Pietro Spennacchio.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad CS, Redler LH, Ciccotti MG, Maffulli N, Longo UG, Bradley J (2013) Evaluation and management of hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med 41(12):2933–2947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alonso A, Khoury L, Adams R (1998) Clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury: reliability and prediction of return to function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27(4):276–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amendola A (1992) Controversies in diagnosis and management of syndesmosis injuries of the ankle. Foot Ankle 13(1):44–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amendola A, Williams G, Foster D (2006) Evidence-based approach to treatment of acute traumatic syndesmosis (high ankle) sprains. Sports Med Arthrosc 14(4):232–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beumer A (2007) Chronic instability of the anterior syndesmosis of the ankle. Acta Orthop Suppl 78(327):4–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beumer A, Swierstra BA, Mulder PG (2002) Clinical diagnosis of syndesmotic ankle instability: evaluation of stress tests behind the curtains. Acta Orthop Scand 73(6):667–669PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, Niesing R, Ginai AZ, Ranstam J, Swierstra BA (2006) Effects of ligament sectioning on the kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a radiostereometric study of 10 cadaveric specimens based on presumed trauma mechanisms with suggestions for treatment. Acta Orthop 77(3):531–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, Niesing R, Heijboer RP, Ranstam J, Swierstra BA (2005) Kinematics before and after reconstruction of the anterior syndesmosis of the ankle: a prospective radiostereometric and clinical study in 5 patients. Acta Orthop 76(5):713–720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bonnin JG (1965) Injury to the ligaments of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 47(4):609–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L (1991) Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 19(3):294–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bozic KJ, Jaramillo D, DiCanzio J, Zurakowski D, Kasser JR (1999) Radiographic appearance of the normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in children. J Pediatr Orthop 19(1):14–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Nothnagel H (2004) MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Am J Roentgenol 182(1):131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Close JR (1956) Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 38(4):761–781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Cesar PC, Avila EM, de Abreu MR (2011) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to physical examination for syndesmotic injury after lateral ankle sprain. Foot Ankle Int 32(12):1110–1114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Del Buono A, Florio A, Boccanera MS, Maffulli N (2013) Syndesmosis injuries of the ankle. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6(4):313–319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ebraheim NA, Taser F, Shafiq Q, Yeasting RA (2006) Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments. Surg Radiol Anat 28(2):142–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edwards GS Jr, DeLee JC (1984) Ankle diastasis without fracture. Foot Ankle 4(6):305–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Endean T, King W, Martin HR (2003) Syndesmotic rupture without ankle fracture. A report of two cases in professional football players. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 93(4):336–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Espinosa N, Smerek JP, Myerson MS (2006) Acute and chronic syndesmosis injuries: pathomechanisms, diagnosis and management. Foot Ankle Clin 11(3):639–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC (1998) Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 19(10):653–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Han SH, Lee JW, Kim S, Suh JS, Choi YR (2007) Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int 28(3):336–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harper MC (1993) An anatomic and radiographic investigation of the tibiofibular clear space. Foot Ankle 14(8):455–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH (1990) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle 10(6):325–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim S, Huh YM, Song HT, Lee SA, Lee JW, Lee JE, Chung IH, Suh JS (2007) Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury of ankle: evaluation with contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state MR imaging. Radiology 242(1):225–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lin C-F (2006) Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(6):372–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lindenfeld T, Parikh S (2005) Clinical tip: heel-thump test for syndesmotic ankle sprain. Foot Ankle Int 26(5):406–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Longo UG, Loppini M, Berton A, Marinozzi A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2012) The FIFA 11 + program is effective in preventing injuries in elite male basketball players: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 40(5):996–1005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maffulli N, Longo UG, Gougoulias N, Caine D, Denaro V (2011) Sport injuries: a review of outcomes. Br Med Bull 97:47–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maffulli N, Longo UG, Gougoulias N, Loppini M, Denaro V (2010) Long-term health outcomes of youth sports injuries. Br J Sports Med 44(1):21–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maffulli N, Longo UG, Spiezia F, Denaro V (2011) Aetiology and prevention of injuries in elite young athletes. Med Sport Sci 56:187–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Magan A, Golano P, Maffulli N, Khanduja V (2014) Evaluation and management of injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Br Med Bull 111(1):101–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marymont JV, Lynch MA, Henning CE (1986) Acute ligamentous diastasis of the ankle without fracture. Evaluation by radionuclide imaging. Am J Sports Med 14(5):407–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Massobrio M, Antonietti G, Albanese P, Necci F (2011) Operative treatment of tibiofibular diastasis: a comparative study between transfixation screw and reabsorbable cerclage. Preliminary result. Clin Ter 162(6):e161–e167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McCollum GA, van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Calder JD, van Dijk CN (2013) Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(6):1328–1337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mei-Dan O, Kots E, Barchilon V, Massarwe S, Nyska M, Mann G (2009) A dynamic ultrasound examination for the diagnosis of ankle syndesmotic injury in professional athletes: a preliminary study. Am J Sports Med 37(5):1009–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller CD, Shelton WR, Barrett GR, Savoie FH, Dukes AD (1995) Deltoid and syndesmosis ligament injury of the ankle without fracture. Am J Sports Med 23(6):746–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miller TL, Skalak T (2014) Evaluation and treatment recommendations for acute injuries to the ankle syndesmosis without associated fracture. Sports Med 44(2):179–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Milz P, Milz S, Steinborn M, Mittlmeier T, Putz R, Reiser M (1998) Lateral ankle ligaments and tibiofibular syndesmosis. 13-MHz high-frequency sonography and MRI compared in 20 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):51–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Morris MW, Rice P, Schneider TE (2009) Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis reconstruction using a free hamstring autograft. Foot Ankle Int 30(6):506–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mulligan EP (2011) Evaluation and management of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Phys Ther Sports 12(2):57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nussbaum ED, Hosea TM, Sieler SD, Incremona BR, Kessler DE (2001) Prospective evaluation of syndesmotic ankle sprains without diastasis. Am J Sports Med 29(1):31–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Oae K, Takao M, Naito K, Uchio Y, Kono T, Ishida J, Ochi M (2003) Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 227(1):155–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC (1994) Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: diagnosis and treatment by arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 10(5):561–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC, Hedman TP (1994) Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy 10(5):558–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Porter DA (2009) Evaluation and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Instr Course Lect 58:575–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Porter DA, May BD, Berney T (2008) Functional outcome after operative treatment for ankle fractures in young athletes: a retrospective case series. Foot Ankle Int 29(9):887–894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Porter DA, Jaggers RR, Barnes AF, Rund AM (2014) Optimal management of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Open Access J Sports Med 5:173–182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Press CM, Gupta A, Hutchinson MR (2009) Management of ankle syndesmosis injuries in the athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep 8(5):228–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R (2008) Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: an evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. Foot Ankle Clin 13(4):611–633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Scranton PE, McDermott JE, Rogers JV (2000) The relationship between chronic ankle instability and variations in mortise anatomy and impingement spurs. Foot Ankle Int 21(8):657–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sikka RS, Fetzer GB, Sugarman E, Wright RW, Fritts H, Boyd JL, Fischer DA (2012) Correlating MRI findings with disability in syndesmotic sprains of NFL players. Foot Ankle Int 33(5):371–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Smith KM, Kovacich-Smith KJ, Witt M (2001) Evaluation and management of high ankle sprains. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 18(3):443–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Takao M, Ochi M, Oae K, Naito K, Uchio Y (2003) Diagnosis of a tear of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The role of arthroscopy of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(3):324–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Taylor DC, Tenuta JJ, Uhorchak JM, Arciero RA (2007) Aggressive surgical treatment and early return to sports in athletes with grade III syndesmosis sprains. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1833–1838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Valkering KP, Vergroesen DA, Nolte PA (2012) Isolated syndesmosis ankle injury. Orthopedics 35(12):e1705–e1710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    van den Bekerom MP, Raven EE (2009) Arthrex tightrope distal tibiofibular syndesmotic stabilization. Foot Ankle Int 30(6):577–578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ward DW (1994) Syndesmotic ankle sprain in a recreational hockey player. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 17(6):385–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Xenos JS, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, Olson EJ, Popovic NA (1995) The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(6):847–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zalavras C, Thordarson D (2007) Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(6):330–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zamzami MM, Zamzam MM (2009) Chronic isolated distal tibiofibular syndesmotic disruption: diagnosis and management. Foot Ankle Surg 15(1):14–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zwipp H, Rammelt S, Grass R (2002) Ligamentous injuries about the ankle and subtalar joints. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19(2):195–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Niek van Dijk
    • 1
  • Umile Giuseppe Longo
    • 2
  • Mattia Loppini
    • 3
  • Pino Florio
    • 2
  • Ludovica Maltese
    • 2
  • Mauro Ciuffreda
    • 2
  • Vincenzo Denaro
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryCampus Bio-Medico UniversityTrigoriaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryHumanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations