Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 3704–3712 | Cite as

Effect of soft tissue laxity of the knee joint on limb alignment correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

  • Dae-Hee Lee
  • Sung-Chul Park
  • Hyung-Joon Park
  • Seung-Beom HanEmail author



Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) cannot always accurately correct limb alignment, resulting in under- or over-correction. This study assessed the relationship between soft tissue laxity of the knee joint and alignment correction in open-wedge HTO.


This prospective study involved 85 patients (86 knees) undergoing open-wedge HTO for primary medial osteoarthritis. The mechanical axis (MA), weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) were measured on radiographs preoperatively and after 6 months, and the differences between the pre- and post-surgery values were calculated. Post-operative WBL ratios of 57–67 % were classified as acceptable correction. WBL ratios <57 and >67 % were classified as under- and over-corrections, respectively.


Preoperative JLCA correlated positively with differences in MA (r = 0.358, P = 0.001) and WBL ratio (P = 0.003). Difference in JLCA showed a stronger correlation than preoperative JLCA with differences in MA (P < 0.001) and WBL ratio (P < 0.001). Difference in JLCA was the only predictor of both difference in MA (P < 0.001) and difference in WBL ratio (P < 0.001). The difference between pre- and post-operative JLCA differed significantly between the under-correction, acceptable-correction, and over-correction groups (P = 0.033). Preoperative JLCA, however, did not differ significantly between the three groups. Neither preoperative JLCA nor difference in JLCA correlated with change in posterior slope.


Preoperative degree of soft tissue laxity in the knee joint was related to the degree of alignment correction, but not to alignment correction error, in open-wedge HTO. Change in soft tissue laxity around the knee from before to after open-wedge HTO correlated with both correction amount and correction error. Therefore, a too large change in JLCA from before to after open-wedge osteotomy may be due to an overly large reduction in JLCA following osteotomy, suggesting alignment over-correction during surgery.

Level of evidence



High tibial osteotomy Joint line convergence angle Alignment correction 


  1. 1.
    Andriacchi TP (1994) Dynamics of knee malalignment. Orthop Clin North Am 25:395–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asada S, Akagi M, Matsushita T, Hashimoto K, Mori S, Hamanishi C (2012) Effects of cartilage remnants of the posterior femoral condyles on femoral component rotation in varus knee osteoarthritis. Knee 19:185–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bito H, Takeuchi R, Kumagai K, Aratake M, Saito I, Hayashi R, Sasaki Y, Aota Y, Saito T (2009) A predictive factor for acquiring an ideal lower limb realignment after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:382–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Briem K, Ramsey DK, Newcomb W, Rudolph KS, Snyder-Mackler L (2007) Effects of the amount of valgus correction for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis on clinical outcome, knee kinetics and muscle co-contraction after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Res 25:311–318CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chao EY, Neluheni EV, Hsu RW, Paley D (1994) Biomechanics of malalignment. Orthop Clin North Am 25:379–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahl MT (2000) Preoperative planning in deformity correction and limb lengthening surgery. Instr Course Lect 49:503–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Azab HM, Morgenstern M, Ahrens P, Schuster T, Imhoff AB, Lorenz SG (2011) Limb alignment after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and its effect on the clinical outcome. Orthopedics 34:e622–e628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eriksson K, Sadr-Azodi O, Singh C, Osti L, Bartlett J (2010) Stress radiography for osteoarthritis of the knee: a new technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1356–1359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaasbeek RD, Nicolaas L, Rijnberg WJ, van Loon CJ, van Kampen A (2010) Correction accuracy and collateral laxity in open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. A one-year randomised controlled study. Int Orthop 34:201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gebhard F, Krettek C, Hufner T, Grutzner PA, Stockle U, Imhoff AB, Lorenz S, Ljungqvist J, Keppler P (2011) Reliability of computer-assisted surgery as an intraoperative ruler in navigated high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:297–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han SB, Bae JH, Lee SJ, Jung TG, Kim KH, Kwon JH, Nha KW (2014) Biomechanical properties of a new anatomical locking metal block plate for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: uniplane osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 26:155–161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C (2006) Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:917–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hankemeier S, Mommsen P, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Brand J, Meyer C, Meller R (2010) Accuracy of high tibial osteotomy: comparison between open- and closed-wedge technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1328–1333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heesterbeek P, Labey L, Wong P, Innocenti B, Wymenga A (2014) A new spacer-guided, PCL balancing technique for cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:650–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hinman RS, May RL, Crossley KM (2006) Is there an alternative to the full-leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 55:306–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoell S, Suttmoeller J, Stoll V, Fuchs S, Gosheger G (2005) The high tibial osteotomy, open versus closed wedge, a comparison of methods in 108 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:638–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A, Suzuki N (2004) Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res 22:1248–1253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kendoff D, Lo D, Goleski P, Warkentine B, O’Loughlin PF, Pearle AD (2008) Open wedge tibial osteotomies influence on axial rotation and tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:904–910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kyung BS, Kim JG, Jang KM, Chang M, Moon YW, Ahn JH, Wang JH (2013) Are navigation systems accurate enough to predict the correction angle during high tibial osteotomy? Comparison of navigation systems with 3-dimensional computed tomography and standing radiographs. Am J Sports Med 41:2368–2374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee DH, Nha KW, Park SJ, Han SB (2012) Preoperative and postoperative comparisons of navigation and radiologic limb alignment measurements after high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 28:1842–1850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee DC, Byun SJ (2012) High tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 24:61–69CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee DH, Han SB, Oh KJ, Lee JS, Kwon JH, Kim JI, Patnaik S, Shetty GM, Nha KW (2014) The weight-bearing scanogram technique provides better coronal limb alignment than the navigation technique in open high tibial osteotomy. Knee 21:451–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee SC, Jung KA, Nam CH, Jung SH, Hwang SH (2010) The short-term follow-up results of open wedge high tibial osteotomy with using an Aescula open wedge plate and an allogenic bone graft: the minimum 1-year follow-up results. Clin Orthop Surg 2:47–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20:366–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nam D, Lin KM, Howell SM, Hull ML (2014) Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2975–2981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Odenbring S, Egund N, Hagstedt B, Larsson J, Lindstrand A, Toksvig-Larsen S (1991) Ten-year results of tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 110:103–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pape D, Duchow J, Rupp S, Seil R, Kohn D (2006) Partial release of the superficial medial collateral ligament for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. A human cadaver study evaluating medial joint opening by stress radiography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:141–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pearle AD, Goleski P, Musahl V, Kendoff D (2009) Reliability of image-free navigation to monitor lower-limb alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:90–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pietsch M, Djahani O, Hochegger M, Plattner F, Hofmann S (2013) Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty: the importance of planning by the surgeon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2220–2226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sabharwal S, Zhao C (2008) Assessment of lower limb alignment: supine fluoroscopy compared with a standing full-length radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:43–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sim JA, Kwak JH, Yang SH, Choi ES, Lee BK (2010) Effect of weight-bearing on the alignment after open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:874–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Song MH, Yoo SH, Kang SW, Kim YJ, Park GT, Pyeun YS (2015) Coronal alignment of the lower limb and the incidence of constitutional varus knee in korean females. Knee Surg Relat Res 27:49–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tsukeoka T, Lee TH (2012) Sagittal flexion of the femoral component affects flexion gap and sizing in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:1094–1099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lohmander LS (2012) High tibial osteotomy in Sweden, 1998–2007: a population-based study of the use and rate of revision to knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:244–248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Saffarini M, Colle F, Sharma B, Kinov PS, Marcacci M, Dejour D (2014) Comparison of stability and kinematics of the natural knee versus a PS TKA with a ‘third condyle’. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1778–1785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dae-Hee Lee
    • 1
  • Sung-Chul Park
    • 2
  • Hyung-Joon Park
    • 2
  • Seung-Beom Han
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anam HospitalKorea University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations