Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 2200–2205 | Cite as

Differences in acromial morphology of shoulders in patients with degenerative and traumatic supraspinatus tendon tears

  • Maurice BalkeEmail author
  • Dennis Liem
  • Oliver Greshake
  • Juergen Hoeher
  • Bertil Bouillon
  • Marc Banerjee
Shoulder

Abstract

Purpose

Distinct characteristics of acromial morphology seem to be one factor for the development of degenerative supraspinatus tendon tears. Thus, it is questionable whether patients with traumatic tendon tears also present these parameters. The hypothesis of the present study was that the acromial morphology of patients with degenerative supraspinatus tendon tears differs from patients with traumatic tears.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-six patients that were treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2010 to 2013 were included in this study. Seventy-two patients had degenerative (group 1), and 64 had traumatic (group 2) supraspinatus tendon tears. On preoperative radiographs the Bigliani type, acromial slope, acromiohumeral (AH) distance, lateral acromial angle (LAA), acromion index (AI), and critical shoulder angle (CSA) were measured. Medians of these parameters as well as of age of both groups were compared using the t test.

Results

The percentaged distribution of the Bigliani type differed (group 1 vs. 2: type 1: 18/38, type 2: 56/55, type 3: 26/8). All parameters showed significant differences between degenerative and traumatic tears. Slope: 21.2° (SD 7.6°) versus 19.2° (SD 7.9°, p = 0.026), AH distance: 8.4 mm (SD 2.3 mm) versus 9.9 mm (SD 1.9 mm, p = 0.0006), LAA: 77.0° (SD 4.0°) versus 82.5° (SD 4.7°, p < 0.0001), AI: 0.77 (SD 0.07) versus 0.73 (0.06, p = 0.0239), and CSA: 36.8° (SD 3.6°) versus 35.3° (SD 2.9°, p = 0.007). An LAA <70° or an AH distance of <5 mm only occurred in degenerative tears. Patients with degenerative tears were significantly older (60 vs. 54 years).

Conclusions

The hypothesis that the acromial morphology of patients with degenerative supraspinatus tendon tears differs from patients with traumatic tears was confirmed. Shoulders with degenerative tears show a narrower subacromial space and a larger lateral extension as well as a steeper angulation of the acromion than with traumatic tears. Thus, the results of this study support the theory of external impingement as a cause for degenerative rotator cuff tears.

Level of evidence

IV.

Keywords

Shoulder trauma Rotator cuff tear Acromial morphology Subacromial decompression Bigliani 

References

  1. 1.
    Armstrong JR (1949) Excision of the acromion in treatment of the supraspinatus syndrome; report of 95 excisions. J Bone Joint Surg Br 31B(3):436–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balke M, Schmidt C, Dedy N, Banerjee M, Bouillon B, Liem D (2013) Correlation of acromial morphology with impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tears. Acta Orthop 84(2):178–183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banas MP, Miller RJ, Totterman S (1995) Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4(6):454–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biberthaler P, Wiedemann E, Nerlich A, Kettler M, Mussack T, Deckelmann S, Mutschler W (2003) Microcirculation associated with degenerative rotator cuff lesions. In vivo assessment with orthogonal polarization spectral imaging during arthroscopy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(3):475–480Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC (1991) The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med 10(4):823–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bright AS, Torpey B, Magid D, Codd T, McFarland EG (1997) Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology. Skeletal Radiol 26(12):718–721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chambler AF, Pitsillides AA, Emery RJ (2003) Acromial spur formation in patients with rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12(4):314–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edelson JG, Taitz C (1992) Anatomy of the coraco-acromial arch. Relation to degeneration of the acromion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(4):589–594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Epstein RE, Schweitzer ME, Frieman BG, Fenlin JM, Mitchell DG (1993) Hooked acromion: prevalence on MR images of painful shoulders. Radiology 187(2):479–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Ticker JB, Pawluk RJ, Hepler M, Ark J, Mow VC, Bigliani LU (1994) Excursion of the rotator cuff under the acromion. Patterns of subacromial contact. Am J Sports Med 22(6):779–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fukuda H, Hamada K, Yamanaka K (1990) Pathology and pathogenesis of bursal-side rotator cuff tears viewed from en bloc histologic sections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:75–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gerber C, Snedeker JG, Baumgartner D, Viehofer AF (2014) Supraspinatus tendon load during abduction is dependent on the size of the critical shoulder angle: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Res 32(7):952–957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gill TJ, McIrvin E, Kocher MS, Homa K, Mair SD, Hawkins RJ (2002) The relative importance of acromial morphology and age with respect to rotator cuff pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(4):327–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goutallier D, Le Guilloux P, Postel JM, Radier C, Bernageau J, Zilber S (2011) Acromio humeral distance less than six millimeter: its meaning in full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(3):246–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hyvonen P, Paivansalo M, Lehtiniemi H, Leppilahti J, Jalovaara P (2001) Supraspinatus outlet view in the diagnosis of stages II and III impingement syndrome. Acta Radiol 42(5):441–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jobe CM (1995) Posterior superior glenoid impingement: expanded spectrum. Arthroscopy 11(5):530–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitay GS, Iannotti JP, Williams GR, Haygood T, Kneeland BJ, Berlin J (1995) Roentgenographic assessment of acromial morphologic condition in rotator cuff impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4(6):441–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumagai J, Sarkar K, Uhthoff HK (1994) The collagen types in the attachment zone of rotator cuff tendons in the elderly: an immunohistochemical study. J Rheumatol 21(11):2096–2100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loew M (2000) Traumatic development of rotator cuff lesion. Scientific principles and consequences for expert assessment. Orthopade 29(10):881–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loew M, Habermeyer P, Wiedemann E, Rickert M, Gohlke F (2000) Recommendations for diagnosis and expert assessment of traumatic rotator cuff lesions. Unfallchirurg 103(5):417–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ludewig PM, Cook TM (2000) Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther 80(3):276–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mall NA, Lee AS, Chahal J, Sherman SL, Romeo AA, Verma NN, Cole BJ (2013) An evidenced-based examination of the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 29(2):366–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mayerhoefer ME, Breitenseher MJ, Wurnig C, Roposch A (2009) Shoulder impingement: relationship of clinical symptoms and imaging criteria. Clin J Sport Med 19(2):83–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moor BK, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh DA, Sukthankar A, Gerber C (2013) Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?: a radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. Bone Joint J 95B(7):935–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neer CS 2nd (1972) Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54(1):41–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nicholson GP, Goodman DA, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1996) The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5(1):1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Sukthankar A, Schmid MR, Gerber C (2006) Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(4):800–805CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Nakagawa Y, Masuhara K, Tamai S (1988) Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(8):1224–1230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Panni AS, Milano G, Lucania L, Fabbriciani C, Logroscino CA (1996) Histological analysis of the coracoacromial arch: correlation between age-related changes and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 12(5):531–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prato N, Peloso D, Franconeri A, Tegaldo G, Ravera GB, Silvestri E, Derchi LE (1998) The anterior tilt of the acromion: radiographic evaluation and correlation with shoulder diseases. Eur Radiol 8(9):1639–1646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sarkar K, Taine W, Uhthoff HK (1990) The ultrastructure of the coracoacromial ligament in patients with chronic impingement syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:49–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid MR, Jost B, Werner CM, Zanetti M (2006) Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(2):376–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shah NN, Bayliss NC, Malcolm A (2001) Shape of the acromion: congenital or acquired–a macroscopic, radiographic, and microscopic study of acromion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10(4):309–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tetreault P, Krueger A, Zurakowski D, Gerber C (2004) Glenoid version and rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Res 22(1):202–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Torrens C, Lopez JM, Puente I, Caceres E (2007) The influence of the acromial coverage index in rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(3):347–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tuite MJ, Toivonen DA, Orwin JF, Wright DH (1995) Acromial angle on radiographs of the shoulder: correlation with the impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165(3):609–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Uhthoff HK, Hammond DI, Sarkar K, Hooper GJ, Papoff WJ (1988) The role of the coracoacromial ligament in the impingement syndrome. A clinical, radiological and histological study. Int Orthop 12(2):97–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vahakari M, Leppilahti J, Hyvonen P, Ristiniemi J, Paivansalo M, Jalovaara P (2010) Acromial shape in asymptomatic subjects: a study of 305 shoulders in different age groups. Acta Radiol 51(2):202–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Worland RL, Lee D, Orozco CG, SozaRex F, Keenan J (2003) Correlation of age, acromial morphology, and rotator cuff tear pathology diagnosed by ultrasound in asymptomatic patients. J South Orthop Assoc 12(1):23–26PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurice Balke
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Dennis Liem
    • 2
  • Oliver Greshake
    • 1
  • Juergen Hoeher
    • 1
  • Bertil Bouillon
    • 3
  • Marc Banerjee
    • 3
  1. 1.Sportsclinic Cologne, Cologne-Merheim Medical CenterUniversity of Witten-HerdeckeCologneGermany
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity Hospital MuensterMünsterGermany
  3. 3.Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical CenterUniversity of Witten-HerdeckeCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations