Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp 2794–2797 | Cite as

The “Lever Sign”: a new clinical test for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture

  • Alessandro Lelli
  • Rita Paola Di Turi
  • David B. Spenciner
  • Marcello Dòmini
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

A new clinical test for the diagnosis of ACL rupture is described: the so-called “Lever Sign”. This prospective study on four groups of patients divided subjects on the basis of MRI findings (complete or partial ACL lesion) and the clinical phase of the injury (acute or chronic). The hypothesis was that this manual test would be diagnostic for both partial and complete tears of the ACL regardless of the elapsed time from injury.

Methods

A total of 400 patients were evaluated and divided into four, equal-sized groups based on time elapsed from injury and MRI findings: Group A (acute phase with positive MRI for complete ACL rupture), Group B (chronic phase with positive MRI for complete ACL rupture), Group C (acute phase with positive MRI for partial ACL rupture), and Group D (chronic phase with positive MRI for partial ACL rupture). Clinical assessment was performed with the Lachman test, the Anterior Drawer test, the Pivot Shift test, and the Lever Sign test. The Lever Sign test involves placing a fulcrum under the supine patient’s calf and applying a downward force to the quadriceps. Depending on whether the ACL is intact or not, the patient’s heel will either rise off of the examination table or remain down. Additionally, the Lever Sign test was performed on the un-injured leg of all 400 patients as a control.

Results

All tests were nearly 100 % sensitive for patients with chronic, complete tears of the ACL. However, for patients with acute, partial tears, the sensitivity was much lower for the Lachman test (0.42), Anterior Drawer test (0.29), and Pivot Shift test (0.11), but not the Lever Sign test (1.00).

Conclusion

In general, chronic, complete tears were most successfully diagnosed but acute, partial tears were least successfully diagnosed. The Lever Sign test is more sensitive to correctly diagnosing both acute and partial tears of the ACL compared with other common manual tests. The clinical relevance is that some ACL ruptures may be more accurately diagnosed.

Keywords

ACL rupture Lachman test Anterior Drawer test Pivot Shift test Lever Sign test 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Kevin Zylka for graphics.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:267–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crawford R, Walley G, Bridgman S, Maffulli N (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review. Br Med Bull 84:5–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeFranco MJ, Bach BR Jr (2009) A comprehensive review of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:198–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guillodo Y, Rannou N, Dubrana F, Lefevre C, Saraux A (2008) Diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in an emergency department. J Trauma 65:1078–1082CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katz JW, Fingeroth RJ (1986) The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries. Am J Sports Med 14:88–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lefevre N, Naouri JF, Bohu Y, Klouche S, Herman S (2014) Sensitivity and specificity of bell-hammer tear as an indirect sign of partial anterior cruciate ligament rupture on magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1112–1118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J (2003) Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:592–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meuffels DE, Poldervaart MT, Diercks RL, Fievez AW, Patt TW, Hart CP, Hammacher ER, Meer F, Goedhart EA, Lenssen AF, Muller-Ploeger SB, Pols MA, Saris DB (2012) Guideline on anterior cruciate ligament injury. Acta Orthop 83:379–386CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oei EH, Nikken JJ, Verstijnen AC, Ginai AZ, Myriam Hunink MG (2003) MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review. Radiology 226:837–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reuben JD, Rovick JS, Schrager RJ, Walker PS, Boland AL (1989) Three-dimensional dynamic motion analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee joint. Am J Sports Med 17:463–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steckel H, Vadala G, Davis D, Fu FH (2006) 2D and 3D 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the double bundle structure in anterior cruciate ligament anatomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1151–1158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Eck CF, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM (2013) Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of physical examinations with and without anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1895–1903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Lelli
    • 1
  • Rita Paola Di Turi
    • 1
  • David B. Spenciner
    • 2
  • Marcello Dòmini
    • 3
  1. 1.Villa Laura Multi-Specialty ClinicBolognaItaly
  2. 2.DePuy Synthes Mitek Sports MedicineRaynhamUSA
  3. 3.Unit of Pediatric SurgeryUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations