Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 2181–2191 | Cite as

Comparison of open acromioplasty, arthroscopic acromioplasty and physiotherapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a prospective randomised study

  • Stefanos FarfarasEmail author
  • Ninni Sernert
  • Erling Hallström
  • Jüri Kartus
Shoulder

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the results two to three years after intervention, using either surgical or non-operative treatment.

Methods

Eighty-seven patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS) were randomised into open acromioplasty (OS group), arthroscopic acromioplasty (AS group) or physiotherapy (PT group) treatment. The assessments comprised the Constant score, the Watson and Sonnabend score, the SF-36 evaluation and a clinical examination performed by an independent observer. Fifty-five patients attended the clinical follow-up.

Results

The groups were comparable at baseline in terms of demographics and clinical assessments. No significant differences in terms of the clinical assessments or health-related quality of life (QoL) were found between the study groups at follow-up. The Constant score had improved significantly at follow-up in both the OS group and the AS group (p = 0.003 and 0.008, respectively). At follow-up, the OS group revealed improved strength compared with before intervention (p = 0.012). All groups revealed a significantly improved internal rotation (OSG p = 0.01, ASG p = 0.005, PTG p = 0.004). The SF-36 was significantly improved in some scales within all three groups. The Watson and Sonnabend score was significantly improved in 12/14 questions for the OS group, in 5/14 questions for the AS group and in 6/14 for the PT group (p < 0.02 OS group vs. AS group, p < 0.05 OS group vs. PT group).

Conclusion

In this randomised study, the Constant score, other clinical assessments and subjective health-related QoL revealed no significant differences between the 3 groups two to three years after intervention in patients with SAIS. The OS group showed a greater improvement over time.

Level of evidence

CT with low follow-up rate, Level II.

Keywords

Subacromial impingement syndrome RCT Surgical treatment Physiotherapy 

References

  1. 1.
    Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J (2011) Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res 63(Suppl 11):S174–S188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biberthaler P, Beirer M, Kirchhoff S, Braunstein V, Wiedemann E, Kirchhoff C (2013) Significant benefit for older patients after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a long-term follow-up study. Int Orthop 37(3):457–462CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bot SD, van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Schellevis FG, Bouter LM, Dekker J (2005) Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice. Ann Rheum Dis 64(1):118–123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brox JI, Gjengedal E, Uppheim G, Bohmer AS, Brevik JI, Ljunggren AE, Staff PH (1999) Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 8(2):102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Böhmer AS (1984) Trening ved kroniske degenerative skulderlidelser. Fysioterapeuten 51:192–197Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chipchase LS, O’Connor DA, Costi JJ, Krishnan J (2000) Shoulder impingement syndrome: preoperative health status. J Shoulder Elb Surg 9(1):12–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis AD, Kakar S, Moros C, Kaye EK, Schepsis AA, Voloshin I (2010) Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 38(3):613–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dickens VA, Williams JL, Bhamra MS (2005) Role of physiotherapy in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: a prospective study. Physiotherapy 91(3):159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dorrestijn O, Stevens M, Winters JC, van der Meer K, Diercks RL (2009) Conservative or surgical treatment for subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18(4):652–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellman H (1987) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: analysis of one- to three-year results. Arthroscopy 3(3):173–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Escamilla RF, Hooks TR, Wilk KE (2014) Optimal management of shoulder impingement syndrome. Open Access J Sports Med 5:13–24. doi: 10.2147/oajsm.s36646 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faber E, Kuiper JI, Burdorf A, Miedema HS, Verhaar JA (2006) Treatment of impingement syndrome: a systematic review of the effects on functional limitations and return to work. J Occup Rehabil 16(1):7–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW (1987) Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther 67(12):1867–1872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gebremariam L, Hay EM, Koes BW, Huisstede BM (2011) Effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions for the subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92(11):1900–1913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haahr JP, Ostergaard S, Dalsgaard J, Norup K, Frost P, Lausen S, Holm EA, Andersen JH (2005) Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up. Ann Rheum Dis 64(5):760–764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holmgren T, Bjornsson Hallgren H, Oberg B, Adolfsson L, Johansson K (2012) Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. BMJ 344:e787CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holmgren T, Hallgren HB, Oberg B, Adolfsson L, Johansson K (2013) Republished research: Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. Br J Sports Med 47(14):908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Husby T, Haugstvedt JR, Brandt M, Holm I, Steen H (2003) Open versus arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a prospective, randomized study of 34 patients followed for 8 years. Acta Orthop Scand 74(4):408–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jonsson P, Wahlstrom P, Ohberg L, Alfredson H (2006) Eccentric training in chronic painful impingement syndrome of the shoulder: results of a pilot study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(1):76–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K (2003) Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 19(10):1109–1120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klintberg IH, Svantesson U, Karlsson J (2010) Long-term patient satisfaction and functional outcome 8-11 years after subacromial decompression. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(3):394–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kuhn JE (2009) Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18(1):138–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, Rose P, Randall T, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (2006) Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 45(2):215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lunsjo K, Bengtsson M, Nordqvist A, Abu-Zidan FM (2011) Patients with shoulder impingement remain satisfied 6 years after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a prospective study of 46 patients. Acta Orthop 82(6):711–713CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN (2004) Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 17(2):152–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neer CS 2nd (1972) Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54(1):41–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ostor AJ, Richards CA, Prevost AT, Speed CA, Hazleman BL (2005) Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 44(6):800–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park SI, Choi YK, Lee JH, Kim YM (2013) Effects of shoulder stabilization exercise on pain and functional recovery of shoulder impingement syndrome patients. J Phys Ther Sci 25(11):1359–1362CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rockwood CA, Lyons FR (1993) Shoulder impingement syndrome: diagnosis, radiographic evaluation, and treatment with a modified Neer acromioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(3):409–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sullivan M, Karlsson J (1998) The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1105–1113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Watson EM, Sonnabend DH (2002) Outcome of rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(3):201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yian EH, Ramappa AJ, Arneberg O, Gerber C (2005) The constant score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14(2):128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yu E, Cil A, Harmsen WS, Schleck C, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2010) Arthroscopy and the dramatic increase in frequency of anterior acromioplasty from 1980 to 2005: an epidemiologic study. Arthroscopy 26(9 Suppl):S142–S147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefanos Farfaras
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Ninni Sernert
    • 2
    • 3
  • Erling Hallström
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jüri Kartus
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsNU Hospital GroupUddevallaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Research and DevelopmentNU Hospital GroupTrollhättanSweden
  3. 3.Institute of Clinical Sciences, the Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  4. 4.Uddevalla SjukhusNU Hospital GroupUddevallaSweden

Personalised recommendations