Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 1304–1310 | Cite as

Iatrogenic articular cartilage injuries during ankle arthroscopy

Ankle
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of iatrogenic articular cartilage injuries during ankle arthroscopy and to determine the factors that caused them. The hypothesis of this study was that the incidence of iatrogenic cartilage injuries produced during ankle arthroscopic procedures is high and directly related to the arthroscopic technique.

Methods

All consecutive records from ankle arthroscopies performed between 2008 and 2010 were reviewed. Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle was excluded from the study. Iatrogenic articular cartilage injury was defined as any cartilage injury that occurred during the arthroscopic procedure.

Results

The final number of ankle arthroscopic procedures reviewed was 74. There were a total of 23 iatrogenic lesions of the cartilage, for an overall complication rate of 31 %. The two most common injury locations were the anterolateral and central area of the talus. The cartilage lesion was superficial in 78.2 % of injuries (24.3 % of all patients), and deep in 21.8 % of injuries (6.7 % of all patients). Of the 23 injuries found, 65 % of them were sustained during the therapeutic portion of the arthroscopic procedure and the remaining 35 % occurred during the portal creation portion of the procedure.

Conclusion

The incidence of cartilage injury during ankle arthroscopy is high. However, severe damage was found in only 6.7 % of ankle arthroscopies.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Keywords

Ankle arthroscopy Complications Cartilage Chondral lesion 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Julie Agel, from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Minnesota (MN, USA), for her contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    Acevedo JI, Busch MT, Ganey TM, Hutton WC, Odgen JA (2000) Coaxial portals for posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study with clinical correlation on 29 patients. Arthroscopy 16:836–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aydin AT, Ozcanli H, Soyuncu Y, Dabak TK (2006) A new noninvasive controlled intra-articular ankle distraction technique on a cadaver model. Arthroscopy 22:905.e1–905.e3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barber FA, Click J, Britt BT (1990) Complications of ankle arthroscopy. Foot Ankle 10:263–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berndt AL, Harty M (1959) Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41:988–1020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bosien WR, Staples OS, Russell SW (1955) Residual disability following ankle sprains. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37:1237–1243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deng DF, Hamilton GA, Lee M, Rush S, Ford LA, Patel S (2012) Complications associated with foot and ankle arthroscopy. J Foot Ankle Surg 51:281–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferkel RD, Heath DD, Guhl JF (1996) Neurological complications of ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 12:200–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferkel RD, Small HN, Gittins JE (2001) Complications in foot and ankle arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:89–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flick AB, Gould N (1985) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus (transchondral fractures of the talus): review of the literature and new surgical approach for medial dome lesions. Foot Ankle 5:165–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golanó P, Vega J, Pérez-Carro L, Götzens V (2006) Ankle anatomy for the arthroscopist. Part I: the portals. Foot Ankle Clin N Am 11:253–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raikin SM, Elias I, Zoga AC, Morrison WB, Besser MP, Schweitzer ME (2007) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme. Foot Ankle Int 28:154–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tohno Y, Kumai T, Kawate K, Kadono K (2005) Cartilage thickness of the talar dome. Arthroscopy 21:401–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Dijk CN (1997) Arthroscopy of the ankle. Arthroscopy 13:90–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Dijk CN, Tol JL, Verheyen CCPM (1997) A prospective study of prognostic factors concerning the outcome of arthroscopic surgery for anterior ankle impingement. Am J Sports Med 25:737–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Young BH, Flanigan RM, DiGiovanni BF (2011) Complications of ankle arthroscopy utilizing a contemporary noninvasive distraction technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:963–968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zengerink M, van Dijk CN (2012) Ankle complications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1420–1431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Foot and Ankle UnitHospital QuirónBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Laboratory of Arthroscopic and Surgical Anatomy, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics (Human Anatomy Unit)University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical SchoolUniversity of PittsburghPisttsburghUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations