Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 3208–3213 | Cite as

Symmetry of squatting and the effect of fatigue following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Kate E. Webster
  • Darren C. Austin
  • Julian A. Feller
  • Ross A. Clark
  • Jodie A. McClelland
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate weight-bearing and joint symmetry during the double-leg squat exercise at baseline and after fatigue in patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared to uninjured controls.

Methods

Ten males who had returned to sport after primary ACLR participated along with ten uninjured male controls. Lower limb kinematic, kinetic and ground reaction force (GRF) data were collected during double-leg squats at baseline and after a generalised fatigue protocol. Symmetry indices were calculated for hip and knee external flexion moments and the vertical GRF (weight-bearing symmetry) at maximum squat depth. These were compared between ACLR and control groups before and after fatigue using ANOVA models.

Results

The ACL group preferentially unloaded the reconstructed limb at baseline, but changed to a more symmetrical load distribution to perform the squat exercise in the fatigue condition. This same loading pattern was seen at both the knee and hip joints. The control group did not show any effect of fatigue. For both groups, symmetry indices were closer to zero (which indicated perfect symmetry) in the fatigue condition.

Conclusions

When prescribing squat exercises, it should be recognised that initially, patients with ACLR tend to unload the affected knee. More symmetrical loading patterns may be achieved by inducing bilateral fatigue. When fatigued, loading symmetry was similar between this patient group and controls. This is relevant information for those who implement rehabilitation training programmes.

Level of evidence

III.

Keywords

ACL Knee joint Rehabilitation Weight-bearing asymmetry Biomechanics 

References

  1. 1.
    Augustsson J, Thomee R, Linden C, Folkesson M, Tranberg R, Karlsson J (2006) Single-leg hop testing following fatiguing exercise: reliability and biomechanical analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 16(2):111–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borotikar BS, Newcomer R, Koppes R, McLean SG, Borotikar BS, Newcomer R, Koppes R, McLean SG (2008) Combined effects of fatigue and decision making on female lower limb landing postures: central and peripheral contributions to ACL injury risk. Clin Biomech 23(1):81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castanharo R, da Luz BS, Bitar AC, D’Elia CO, Castropil W, Duarte M (2011) Males still have limb asymmetries in multijoint movement tasks more than 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci 16(5):531–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chmielewski TL (2011) Asymmetrical lower extremity loading after ACL reconstruction: more than meets the eye. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41(6):374–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chmielewski TL, Wilk KE, Snyder-Mackler L (2002) Changes in weight-bearing following injury or surgical reconstruction of the ACL: relationship to quadriceps strength and function. Gait Posture 16(1):87–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis RB, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR (1991) A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ernst GP, Saliba E, Diduch DR, Hurwitz SR, Ball DW (2000) Lower extremity compensations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther 80(3):251–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Escamilla RF (2001) Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33(1):127–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fagenbaum R, Darling W (2003) Jump landing strategies in male and female college athletes and the implications of such strategies for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 31(2):233–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hewett T, Myer G, Ford K, Heidt RJ, Colosimo A, McLean S, van den Bogert A, Paterno M, Succop P (2005) Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 33(4):492–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hodges SJ, Patrick RJ, Reiser FR 2nd (2011) Effects of fatigue on bilateral ground reaction force asymmetries during the squat exercise. J Strength Cond Res 25(11):3107–3117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME (1990) Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res 8(3):383–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kernozek T, Torry M, Iwasaki M (2008) Gender differences in lower extremity landing mechanics caused by neuromuscular fatigue. Am J Sports Med 36(3):554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kowalk DL, Duncan JA, McCue FC 3rd, Vaughan CL (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and joint dynamics during stair climbing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29(11):1406–1413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Logerstedt D, Lynch A, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2013) Symmetry restoration and functional recovery before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(4):859–868PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McClelland JA, Webster KE, Grant C, Feller J (2010) Alternative modelling procedures for pelvic marker occlusion during motion analysis. Gait Posture 31(4):415–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLean SG, Samorezov JE (2009) Fatigue-induced ACL injury risk stems from a degradation in central control. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(8):1661–1672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neitzel JA, Kernozek TW, Davies GJ (2002) Loading response following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during the parallel squat exercise. Clin Biomech 17(7):551–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Noakes TD (2000) Physiological models to understand exercise fatigue and the adaptations that predict or enhance athletic performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10(3):123–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Orishimo KF, Kremenic IJ, Mullaney MJ, McHugh MP, Nicholas SJ (2010) Adaptations in single-leg hop biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(11):1587–1593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Huang B, Hewett TE (2010) Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med 38(10):1968–1978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richards JG (1999) The measurement of human motion: a comparison of commercially available systems. Hum Mov Sci 18(5):589–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robinson RO, Herzog W, Nigg BM (1987) Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 10(4):172–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salem GJ, Salinas R, Harding FV (2003) Bilateral kinematic and kinetic analysis of the squat exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(8):1211–1216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thomeé R, Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomeé P, Augustsson J, Eriksson B, Karlsson J (2012) Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(6):1143–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Webster KE, Gonzalez-Adrio R, Feller JA (2004) Dynamic joint loading following hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(1):15–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Webster KE, Santamaria LJ, McClelland JA, Feller JA (2012) Effect of fatigue on landing biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(5):910–916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Webster KE, Wittwer JE, O’Brien J, Feller JA (2005) Gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are related to graft type. Am J Sports Med 33(2):247–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    White K, Di Stasi S, Smith A, Snyder-Mackler L (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament-specialized post-operative return-to-sports (ACL-SPORTS) training: a randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:108PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Windolfa M, Götzen N, Morlockb M (2008) Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems—exemplified on the Vicon-460 system. J Biomech 41(12):2776–2780CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate E. Webster
    • 1
  • Darren C. Austin
    • 2
  • Julian A. Feller
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ross A. Clark
    • 4
  • Jodie A. McClelland
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Allied HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of PhysiotherapyLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Epworth HealthCareRichmondAustralia
  4. 4.School of Exercise ScienceAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations