The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Short Form: a validity and reliability study
- 508 Downloads
The purpose of the present research was to translate the original English version of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Short Form to Persian and to assess validity and reliability of it in Iranian patients with ACL injury.
The Persian version of the IKDC Subjective Short Form was administered to 145 patients including 111 men (76 %) and 34 women (24 %) with the clinical diagnosis of knee ACL tear that were referred to our Knee and Shoulder Center at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. The Persian IKDC Subjective Short Form and Persian SF-36 questionnaire were completed by patients in the clinic before beginning any treatment intervention. Patients filled out the Persian IKDC 72 h again before receiving a major treatment; we were then able to use the test–retest method to calculate reliability.
The average age of the subjects was 30.9 ± 10.4 years. The calculated ICC with 95 % confidence interval was 0.845. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.845. There were significant correlations between mean total score of the Persian IKDC and all items of the SF36 (P < 0.05) except for MCS (P = 0.055).
Cronbach’s alpha and correlation of IKDC Subjective Short Form and SF-36 demonstrated that the Persian version of IKDC has both strong reliability and validity. The Iranian version of IKDC has favourable validity and reliability and therefore can be used to assess Persian-speaking patients with cruciate ligament injuries.
Level of evidence
KeywordsIKDC Validity Reliability Persian Version Iran ACL Persian
We would like to thank Parand Pajoohesh Institute for their assistance in doing data analysis of the survey.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 2.Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM (2011) Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS)”. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63:208–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hendricson WD, Russell IJ, Prihoda TJ, Jacobson JM, Rogan A, Bishop GD, Castillo R (2000) Development and initial validation of a dual-language English–Spanish format for the arthritis impact measurement scales. Spine 24:25Google Scholar
- 8.Kim JG, Oh SJ, Lee MC, Seo SS, Choi CH, Yoo JH (2008) Cross cultural adaptation and translating the IKDC Subjective Form into the Korean language. J Korean Knee Soc 20(2):161–168Google Scholar
- 11.Metsavaht L, Leporace G, Riberto M, de Mello Sposito MM, Batista LA (2010) Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: validity and reproducibility. Am J Sports Med 38(9):1894–1899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Natalie J, Collins Devyani Misra, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM (2011) Measures of knee function. Arthritis Care Res 63(11):S208–S228Google Scholar