Advertisement

Comparison of chondral versus osteochondral lesions of the talus after arthroscopic microfracture

  • Hyeong-Won Park
  • Keun-Bae LeeEmail author
Ankle

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic microfracture for chondral and osteochondral lesions of the talus, and to identify the characteristics.

Method

One hundred and four ankles were divided into two groups, namely chondral group (58 ankles) and osteochondral group (46 ankles). The chondral group consisted of 37 men and 21 women with a mean age of 41.5 years [95 % confidence interval (CI) 38.9–44.1] and a mean follow-up duration of 37.6 months (95 % CI 34.7–40.5). The osteochondral group consisted of 25 men and 21 women with a mean age of 22.5 years (95 % CI 19.5–22.5) and a mean follow-up duration of 38.3 months (95 % CI 35.4–41.2). Outcomes were measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, and ankle activity score (AAS).

Results

Mean AOFAS score was 64.9 points (95 % CI 63.0–66.9) in the chondral group and 68.2 points (95 % CI 65.8–70.5) in the osteochondral group preoperatively, and it had improved to 88.8 points (95 % CI 86.8–90.8) and 93.5 points (95 % CI 91.4–95.6) at final follow-up. Mean AAS changed from 2.7 (95 % CI 2.5–2.9) preoperatively to 6.4 (95 % CI 6.0–6.8) in the chondral group, and from 2.5 (95 % CI 2.3–2.8) preoperatively to 6.6 (95 % CI 6.3–6.9) in the osteochondral group at final follow-up. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of AOFAS and AAS. The chondral group showed older age, less trauma history, longer symptom duration, smaller lesion size, and more frequent degenerative changes such as subchondral cyst and synovitis.

Conclusion

Both chondral and osteochondral lesions of the talus treated with arthroscopic microfracture showed similar good clinical outcomes. It is important to note that two groups had different characteristics in age distribution, frequency of trauma history, symptom duration, lesion size and location, and incidence of degenerative changes. This study demonstrated that microfracture could improve clinical outcomes significantly both chondral and osteochondral lesions of talus despite their different characteristics.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative study, Level II.

Keywords

Talus Cartilage Chondral lesion Osteochondral lesion Arthroscopic microfracture Outcome comparison 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors did not receive any external funding for this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson IF, Crichton KJ, Grattan-Smith T, Cooper RA, Brazier D (1989) Osteochondral fractures of the dome of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1143–1152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartha L, Vajda A, Duska Z, Rahmeh H, Hangody L (2006) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty grafting. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:739–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, Longo UG, Maffulli N, Thermann H (2010) Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:656–663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becher C, Thermann H (2005) Results of microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 26:583–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berndt AL, Harty M (1959) Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41:988–1020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferkel RD, Scranton PE Jr (1993) Arthroscopy of the ankle and foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(8):1233–1242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi GW, Choi WJ, Youn HK, Park YJ, Lee JW (2013) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: are there any differences between osteochondral and chondral types? Am J Sports Med 41:504–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi WJ, Kim BS, Lee JW (2012) Osteochondral lesion of the talus: could age be an indication for arthroscopic treatment? Am J Sports Med 40:419–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi WJ, Park KK, Kim BS, Lee JW (2009) Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? Am J Sports Med 37:1974–1980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chuckpaiwong B, Berkson EM, Theodore GH (2008) Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases. Arthroscopy 24:106–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donnenwerth MP, Roukis TS (2012) Outcome of arthroscopic debridement and microfracture as the primary treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome. Arthroscopy 28:1902–1907CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doral MN, Bilge O, Batmaz G, Donmez G, Turhan E, Demirel M, Atay OA, Uzumcugil A, Atesok K, Kaya D (2012) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with microfracture technique and postoperative hyaluronan injection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1398–1403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elias I, Zoga AC, Morrison WB, Besser MP, Schweitzer ME, Raikin SM (2007) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme. Foot Ankle Int 28:154–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferkel RD, Zanotti RM, Komenda GA, Sgaglione NA, Cheng MS, Applegate GR, Dopirak RM (2008) Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long-term results. Am J Sports Med 36:1750–1762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frisbie DD, Morisset S, Ho CP, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, McIlwraith CW (2006) Effects of calcified cartilage on healing of chondral defects treated with microfracture in horses. Am J Sports Med 34:1824–1831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Halasi T, Kynsburg A, Tallay A, Berkes I (2004) Development of a new activity score for the evaluation of ankle instability. Am J Sports Med 32:899–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumai T, Takakura Y, Higashiyama I, Tamai S (1999) Arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1229–1235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee DH, Lee KB, Jung ST, Seon JK, Kim MS, Sung IH (2012) Comparison of early versus delayed weight bearing outcomes after microfracture for small to midsized osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 40:2023–2028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee KB, Bai LB, Chung JY, Seon JK (2010) Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:247–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McGahan PJ, Pinney SJ (2010) Current concept review: osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 31:90–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Monden S, Hasegawa A, Takagishi K (2010) A clinical study of chondral-separated types of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 31:124–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murawski CD, Kennedy JG (2013) Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(11):1045–1054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Loughlin PF, Heyworth BE, Kennedy JG (2010) Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 38:392–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robinson DE, Winson IG, Harries WJ, Kelly AJ (2003) Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:989–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Takao M, Ochi M, Naito K, Uchio Y, Kono T, Oae K (2003) Arthroscopic drilling for chondral, subchondral, and combined chondral-subchondral lesions of the talar dome. Arthroscopy 19:524–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Takao M, Uchio Y, Kakimaru H, Kumahashi N, Ochi M (2004) Arthroscopic drilling with debridement of remaining cartilage for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome in unstable ankles. Am J Sports Med 32:332–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    van Dijk CN, Tol JL, Verheyen CC (1997) A prospective study of prognostic factors concerning the outcome of arthroscopic surgery for anterior ankle impingement. Am J Sports Med 25:737–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yoshimura I, Kanazawa K, Takeyama A, Angthong C, Ida T, Hagio T, Hanada H, Naito M (2013) Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation techniques for osteochondral lesions of the talus: prognostic factors for small lesions. Am J Sports Med 41:528–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN (2010) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:238–246CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryChonnam National University Medical School and HospitalGwangjuKorea

Personalised recommendations