Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 1805–1811 | Cite as

How to improve femoral component rotational alignment in computer-assisted TKA

  • F. Zambianchi
  • T. Luyckx
  • J. Victor
  • V. Digennaro
  • A. Giorgini
  • F. Catani
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Although several anatomical landmarks have been proposed to obtain adequate femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is still no consensus regarding the best way to correctly position the prosthetic component on the horizontal plane. A previous computed tomography (CT)-based study has demonstrated anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA) to be externally rotated relative to surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) of approximately 4.5°. In this study, it is described a new methodological approach to femoral component rotational positioning through the use of previously reported CT scan information and navigation.

Methods

Eight consecutive patients scheduled for navigated TKA were selected. Rotational placement of the femoral component was performed using navigation system. The femoral component was implanted setting 4.5° of internal rotation relative to the aTEA. Within 1 week from surgery, all patients underwent a CT scan, and the posterior condylar angle (PCA) was measured. A PCA of 0.0°, meaning component placement parallel to sTEA, was set as femoral rotational alignment target. Clinical evaluation was performed at a mean 14.3 months of follow-up with KOOS questionnaire.

Results

The mean PCA measured on post-operative CT images was 0.4° (SD 1.3°), meaning that the femoral component was averagely implanted with 0.4° of internal rotation relative to the sTEA. Seven out of eight cases (87.5 %) resulted to have within 1° deviation from the rotational alignment target. All patients but one reported good clinical results.

Conclusions

Relevant finding of the present study was that the use of navigation and aTEA as a reference demonstrated to be accurate to set up femoral component rotational positioning on the horizontal plane in TKA. Further study should be performed to confirm this conclusion.

Level of evidence

III.

Keywords

TKA Rotation Alignment Navigation aTEA 

References

  1. 1.
    Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A (2008) Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(11):2751–2755PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:155–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akagi M, Yamashita E, Nakagawa T, Asano T, Nakamura T (2001) Relationship between frontal knee alignment and reference axes in the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:147–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplasty 20(8):1060–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):372–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng T, Zhang G, Zhang X (2011) Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Res 171(2):590–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X (2012) Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(7):1307–1322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:156–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fehring TK (2000) Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:72–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q (2012) Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(6):1075–1082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Poilvache PL (2000) Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplasty 15(3):354–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75(1):74–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    LaPrade RF, Engebretsen AH, Ly TV, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L (2007) The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(9):2000–2010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laskin RS (1995) Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(5):657–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luyckx T, Zambianchi F, Catani F, Bellemans J, Victor J (2013) Coronal alignment is a predictor of the rotational geometry of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2331–2337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Hirata G, Iwamoto Y (2001) Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg 14(3):152–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):236–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monticone M, Ferrante S, Salvaderi S, Rocca B, Totti V, Foti C, Roi GS (2012) Development of the Italian version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for patients with knee injuries: cross-cultural adaptation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20(4):330–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nicoll D, Rowley DI (2010) Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(9):1238–1244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oberst M, Bertsch C, Würstlin S, Holz U (2003) CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study. Unfallchirurg 106(11):941–948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:39–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:180–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stoeckl B, Nogler M, Krismer M, Beimel C, de la Barrera JL, Kessler O (2006) Reliability of the transepicondylar axis as an anatomical landmark in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(6):878–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y (2001) Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 16(4):493–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zimmermann F, Schwenninger C, Nolten U, Firmbach FP, Elfring R, Radermacher K (2012) A new approach to implant alignment and ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty focussing on joint loads. Biomed Tech (Berl) 57(4):283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Zambianchi
    • 1
  • T. Luyckx
    • 2
  • J. Victor
    • 3
  • V. Digennaro
    • 1
  • A. Giorgini
    • 1
  • F. Catani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di ModenaUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenPellenbergBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity Hospital GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations