Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft: a retrospective comparison of tunnel widening upon use of two different femoral fixation methods
- 836 Downloads
To compare femoral and tibial tunnel widening (TW) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an interference screw (IS), or an EndoButton-Continuous Loop® on the femoral side, and an IS/staple on the tibial side.
Between 2006 and 2009, at a single institution, 72 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon grafting were retrospectively reviewed. Fixation was performed, and with the EndoButton-Continuous Loop® device (Group Ι) in 48 patients (mean age 29.1 ± 7.3 years) with a bioabsorbable IS (Group ΙΙ) in 24 patients (mean age 28.5 ± 8.4 years) on the femoral side. Evaluation included standardized anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiography. The diameters of tunnels at the last follow-up visit (at a median time of 17 months postoperatively) were compared to those noted on radiographs taken 1 day postoperatively.
The two groups were similar in terms of age and gender distribution, the operated side, the size of the tunnel created, and the follow-up period (n.s.). Femoral TW at the proximal and middle levels (on both AP and lateral views) in Group ΙΙ was significantly greater than in Group Ι (p < 0.050 for all comparisons). No significant difference in femoral TW at the distal level was evident between the groups, and tibial TW at all levels was similar in both groups (n.s.).
Femoral TW is less after EndoButton-Continuous Loop® fixation and not reduced after IS fixation. Surgeons should be aware of TW when selecting a fixation device for hamstring graft.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic, retrospective comparative study, Level III.
KeywordsAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Tunnel widening EndoButton Interference screw
The study was not externally funded.
Conflict of interest
No author had any conflict of interest.
- 2.Baumfeld JA, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Hart JA, Miller MD, Barr MS, Hart JM (2008) Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(12):1108–1113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Clatworthy MG, Bartelett J, Howell S (1999) The effect of graft fixation techniques on tunnel widening in hamstring ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15 (Suppl)(7):9–22Google Scholar
- 19.Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Tallroth K (1999) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(5):290–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kobayashi M, Nakagawa Y, Suzuki T, Okudaira S, Nakamura T (2006) A retrospective review of bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons fixed with a metal round cannulated interference screw in the femur. Arthroscopy 22(10):1093–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Nagamune K, Nishimoto K, Hoshino Y, Mizuno K, Kuroda R, Hata Y, Kurosaka M (2007) Automatic extraction method of bone tunnel of the anterior cruciate ligament from multi detector row computed tomography data. International conference on complex medical engineering. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4381786
- 32.Vadala A, Iorio R, De Carli A, Argento G, Di Sanzo V, Conteduca F, Ferretti A (2007) The effect of accelerated, brace free, rehabilitation on bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(4):365–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar