Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 2032–2040 | Cite as

A matched-pair comparison of two different locking plates for valgus-producing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: peek–carbon composite plate versus titanium plate

  • Matthias Cotic
  • Stephan Vogt
  • Stefan Hinterwimmer
  • Matthias J. Feucht
  • Julia Slotta-Huspenina
  • Tibor Schuster
  • Andreas B. ImhoffEmail author



The first purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcome of two different locking plates used for valgus-producing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The second purpose was to histologically evaluate peek–carbon wear for biocompatibility.


Twenty-six consecutive patients undergoing open-wedge HTO using the first-generation PEEKPower HTO-Plate® (Group I) were matched with 26 patients after open-wedge HTO with the TomoFix™ plate (Group II). Clinical scores (visual analogue scale for pain, WOMAC, Lysholm score) were obtained preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of 24 months postoperatively. Fixation stability was evaluated radiographically by comparing the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and tibial slope 2 days after open-wedge HTO and after implant removal. Tissue samples of Group I were collected at the time of implant removal for histologic evaluation.


Implant-related complications occurred in 15 % (n = 4) of Group I and 0 % of Group II. Out of them, 3 implant replacements were excluded from statistical analyses. After a final median follow-up of 25 months (range 24–31), the clinical scores in both groups showed significant improvements compared to preoperatively (visual analogue scale, WOMAC, Lysholm score; p < 0.001), without significant group differences (visual analogue scale, n.s.; WOMAC, n.s.; Lysholm score, n.s.). No significant differences between baseline and follow-up measurements for MPTA and tibial slope were observed within each group (MPTA: Gr. I, n.s.; Gr. II, n.s.; tibial slope: Gr. I, n.s.; Gr. II, n.s.) or between the two groups (MPTA, n.s.; tibial slope, n.s.). In histologic samples, CF PEEK abrasion did not induce inflammation or tissue necrosis.


The first-generation PEEKPower HTO-Plate® provided a higher rate of implant-related complications compared to the TomoFix™ plate at a minimum follow-up of 24 months after valgus-producing open-wedge HTO. Therefore, it is not recommended to use the first-generation PEEKPower HTO-Plate® in the clinical practice.

Level of evidence



High tibial osteotomy Open wedge PEEKPower HTO-plate TomoFix plate 


Conflict of interest

A.B. Imhoff and Stefan Hinterwimmer are consultants for Arthrex. The company had no influence on study design, data collection, and interpretation of the results or the final manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Vena LM, Baldini A, Mondaini A (2003) High tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis: a 10-to 21-year study. J Knee Surg 16(1):21–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P (2006) Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(3):291–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brazier J, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A (1996) Evaluation of methods for radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. A study of 83 healthy knees. Rev de Chir Orthop et Reparatrice de Appar Mot 82(3):195–200Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brinkman JM, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD, Staubli AE, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2008) Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90(12):1548–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brinkman JM, Luites JW, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2010) Early full weight bearing is safe in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Acta orthop 81(2):193–198PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brosset T, Pasquier G, Migaud H, Gougeon F (2011) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy performed without filling the defect but with locking plate fixation (TomoFix) and early weight-bearing: prospective evaluation of bone union, precision and maintenance of correction in 51 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(7):705–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cotic M, Slotta-Huspenina J, Noël PB, Imhoff AB (2011) Paper # 69: two-year results of open-wedge tibial osteotomy with fixation by the PEEKPower HTO-plate for varus Malalignment with unicompartimental osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthroscopy 27(10):e111–e112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El-Azab HM, Morgenstern M, Ahrens P, Schuster T, Imhoff AB, Lorenz SG (2011) Limb alignment after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and its effect on the clinical outcome. Orthopedics 34(10):e622–e628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S, Goldhahn S, Lobenhoffer P (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):170–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaasbeek RD, Sonneveld H, van Heerwaarden RJ, Jacobs WC, Wymenga AB (2004) Distal tuberosity osteotomy in open wedge high tibial osteotomy can prevent patella infera: a new technique. Knee 11(6):457–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Getgood A, Collins B, Slynarski K, Kurowska E, Parker D, Engebretsen L, MacDonald PB, Litchfield R (2013) Short-term safety and efficacy of a novel high tibial osteotomy system: a case controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):260–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gould DD, Kelly DD, Goldstone LL, Gammon JJ (2001) Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs 10(5):697–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hinterwimmer S, Beitzel K, Paul J, Kirchhoff C, Sauerschnig M, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Imhoff AB (2011) Control of posterior tibial slope and patellar height in open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 39(4):851–856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Howling GI, Sakoda H, Antonarulrajah A, Marrs H, Stewart TD, Appleyard S, Rand B, Fisher J, Ingham E (2003) Biological response to wear debris generated in carbon based composites as potential bearing surfaces for artificial hip joints. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 67(2):758–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hui C, Salmon LJ, Kok A, Williams HA, Hockers N, van der Tempel WM, Chana R, Pinczewski LA (2011) Long-term survival of high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Am J Sports Med 39(1):64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobi M, Wahl P, Jakob RP (2010) Avoiding intraoperative complications in open-wedge high tibial valgus osteotomy: technical advancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(2):200–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaper BP, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Macdonald SJ (2001) Patellar infera after high tibial osteotomy. J Arthroplast 16(2):168–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Windisch C, Kolb K, Koller H, Grutzner P (2009) Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked low-profile plate. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(11):2581–2588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28(32):4845–4869PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(3):132–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lobenhoffer PP, Agneskirchner JJ, Zoch WW (2004) Open valgus alignment osteotomy of the proximal tibia with fixation by medial plate fixator. Orthopade 33(2):153–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luites JW, Brinkman JM, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2009) Fixation stability of opening-versus closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a randomised clinical trial using radiostereometry. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91(11):1459–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luo CA, Hua SY, Lin SC, Chen CM, Tseng CS (2013) Stress and stability comparison between different systems for high tibial osteotomies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:110PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matar WY, Boscariol R, Dervin GF (2009) Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a roentgenographic comparison of a horizontal and an oblique osteotomy on patellar height and sagittal tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 37(4):735–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meidinger G, Imhoff AB, Paul J, Kirchhoff C, Sauerschnig M, Hinterwimmer S (2011) May smokers and overweight patients be treated with a medial open-wedge HTO? Risk factors for non-union. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(3):333–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mont MA, Stuchin SA, Paley D, Sharkey PF, Parvisi J, Tria AJ Jr, Bonutti PM, Etienne G (2004) Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, results, and controversies. Instr Course Lect 53:265–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morawietz L, Classen RA, Schroder JH, Dynybil C, Perka C, Skwara A, Neidel J, Gehrke T, Frommelt L, Hansen T, Otto M, Barden B, Aigner T, Stiehl P, Schubert T, Meyer-Scholten C, Konig A, Strobel P, Rader CP, Kirschner S, Lintner F, Ruther W, Bos I, Hendrich C, Kriegsmann J, Krenn V (2006) Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane. J Clin Pathol 59(6):591–597PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Naudie D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bourne TJ (1999) The install award. survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy. A 10-to-22-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:18–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Niemeyer P, Koestler W, Kaehny C, Kreuz PC, Brooks CJ, Strohm PC, Helwig P, Suedkamp NP (2008) Two-year results of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with fixation by medial plate fixator for medial compartment arthritis with varus malalignment of the knee. Arthroscopy 24(7):796–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Niemeyer P, Schmal H, Hauschild O, von Heyden J, Sudkamp NP, Kostler W (2010) Open-wedge osteotomy using an internal plate fixator in patients with medial-compartment gonarthritis and varus malalignment: 3 year results with regard to preoperative arthroscopic and radiographic findings. Arthroscopy 26(12):1607–1616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pape D, Kohn D, van Giffen N, Hoffmann A, Seil R, Lorbach O (2013) Differences in fixation stability between spacer plate and plate fixator following high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):82–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Parker DA, Viskontas DG (2007) Osteotomy for the early varus arthritic knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 15(1):3–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rivard CH, Rhalmi S, Coillard C (2002) In vivo biocompatibility testing of peek polymer for a spinal implant system: a study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 62(4):488–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rossi R, Bonasia DE, Amendola A (2011) The role of high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(10):590–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schroter S, Ihle C, Mueller J, Lobenhoffer P, Stockle U, van Heerwaarden R (2013) Digital planning of high tibial osteotomy. Interrater reliability by using two different software. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):189–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Scotchford CA, Garle MJ, Batchelor J, Bradley J, Grant DM (2003) Use of a novel carbon fibre composite material for the femoral stem component of a THR system: in vitro biological assessment. Biomaterials 24(26):4871–4879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF (2003) Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A (3):469–474Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Staubli AE, De Simoni C, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P (2003) TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia–early results in 92 cases. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B55–B62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Staubli AE, Jacob HA (2010) Evolution of open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy: experience with a special angular stable device for internal fixation without interposition material. Int Orthop 34(2):167–172PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Steinberg EL, Rath E, Shlaifer A, Chechik O, Maman E, Salai M (2013) Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK Optima–a composite material biomechanical properties and wear/debris characteristics of CF-PEEK composites for orthopedic trauma implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 17:221–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stoffel KK, Stachowiak GG, Kuster MM (2004) Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: biomechanical investigation of the modified Arthrex osteotomy plate (Puddu Plate) and the TomoFix plate. Clin Biomech 19(9):944–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Aratake M, Bito H, Saito I, Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Saito T (2009) Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with early full weight bearing. Arthroscopy 25(1):46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Valkering KP, van den Bekerom MP, Kappelhoff FM, Albers GH (2009) Complications after tomofix medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg 22(3):218–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vandamme K, Naert I, Geris L, Vander Sloten J, Puers R, Duyck J (2007) The effect of micro-motion on the tissue response around immediately loaded roughened titanium implants in the rabbit. Eur J Oral Sci 115(1):21–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang JH, Bae JH, Lim HC, Shon WY, Kim CW, Cho JW (2009) Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: the effect of the cortical hinge on posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2411–2418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Westrich GH, Peters LE, Haas SB, Buly RL, Windsor RE (1998) Patella height after high tibial osteotomy with internal fixation and early motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:169–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Cotic
    • 1
  • Stephan Vogt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stefan Hinterwimmer
    • 3
  • Matthias J. Feucht
    • 1
  • Julia Slotta-Huspenina
    • 4
  • Tibor Schuster
    • 5
  • Andreas B. Imhoff
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Sports MedicineTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Sports MedicineHessing Stiftung AugsburgAugsburgGermany
  3. 3.Sportsclinic Germany GmbHMunichGermany
  4. 4.Institute of PathologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
  5. 5.Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Occupational HealthMcGill University MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations