Femoral marrow cavity bone harvesting used for arthroscopic refilling of misplaced or enlarged bone tunnels in revision ACL surgery

An arthroscopically supported technique with antegrade intramedullary bone harvesting by a reamer–irrigator–aspirator (RIA) system
  • S. Grote
  • T. Helfen
  • F. Mück
  • M. Regauer
  • W. C. Prall
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery, refilling of misplaced or enlarged tunnels frequently requires bone harvesting from the iliac crest. Unfortunately, donor-site pain displays a relevant complication. In order to optimize patients’ comfort, we developed a procedure combining minimally invasive intramedullary bone harvesting from the femur with arthroscopic tunnel refilling.

Methods

Patients with ACL reconstruction failure that were not eligible for one-step revision surgery but required tunnel refilling prior to the next ACL reconstruction were enrolled prospectively. Cancellous bone was harvested intramedullarily from the ipsilateral femur using the reamer–irrigator–aspirator system in a minimally invasive manner. Afterwards, the femoral and tibial tunnels were arthroscopically refilled using cones and push rods. Computer tomography (CT) analyses were carried out before and after the filling procedure. Pain levels were assessed during the entire follow-up. Patients undergoing iliac crest bone harvesting for other reasons served as a control group. Finally, the quality of the newly formed bone stock was evaluated in the subsequent ACL reconstruction procedure.

Results

Five patients were included during a 6-month period. Prior to refilling, tunnel analysis revealed a mean tunnel volume of 7.9 cm3 at the femur [SD ±5.3 cm3] and of 6.7 cm3 [SD ±5.1 cm3] at the tibia. The CT analyses further revealed that graft failure was predominantly caused by tunnel misplacement. Post-operatively, pain levels due to intramedullary bone harvesting were significantly lower compared to iliac crest bone harvesting at every analysed time point. Three to five months after tunnel filling, CT analyses showed sufficiently incorporated bone stocks with filling rates of 75 % femoral and 94 % tibial. ACL revision surgery was performed 4–5 months after tunnel filling without any complication.

Conclusion

Intramedullary bone harvesting from the ipsilateral femur combined with arthroscopic refilling of the bone tunnels ensures a high-quality bone stock for further ACL reconstruction. The clinical relevance is shown by the feasibility of this technique and the significantly reduced pain levels during post-operative recovery.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, Level III.

Keywords

ACL revision surgery Tunnel widening Bone graft harvesting Reamer–irrigator–aspirator system Iliac crest bone harvesting 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Joachim Dewes (DePuy-Synthes, Umkrich, Germany) for technical assistance with the RIA® Systems and Hella Thun (Ludwig-Maximilians-University) for the figure illustrations. We further thank Dr. Hans Polzer and Tanya Reid Prall for carefully reading and correcting the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest; all mentioned companies were not involved in this trail.

References

  1. 1.
    Bach B (2003) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Arthroscopy 19((10, Supplement 1)):14–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ III (2010) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy 26(3):342–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belthur M, Conway J, Jindal G, Ranade A, Herzenberg J (2008) Bone graft harvest using a new intramedullary system. Clin Orthop Rel Res 466:2973–2980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox G, McGonagle D, Boxall SA, Buckley CT, Jones E, Giannoudis PV (2011) The use of the reamer-irrigator-aspirator to harvest mesenchymal stem cells. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 93-B(4):517–524Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2011) Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review. Injury 42(Supplement 2 (0)):3–15Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Getelman MH, Friedman MJ (1999) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7(3):189–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL, Greenfield ML (1997) Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Rel Res 339:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Höher J, Möller HD, Fu FH (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(4):231–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Howe JG, Johnson RJ, Kaplan MJ, Fleming B, Jarvinen J (1991) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps patellar tendon grafts. Part 1 long-term followup. Am J Sport Med 19(5):447–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Husebye EE, Lyberg T, Madsen JE, Eriksen M, Raise O (2006) The influence of a one-step reamer-irrigator-aspirator technique on the intramedullary pressure in the pig femur. Injury 37(10):935–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Husebye EE, Lyberg T, Opdahl H, Laurvik H, Røise O (2010) Cardiopulmonary response to reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur comparing traditional reaming with a one-step reamer-irrigator-aspirator reaming system: an experimental study in pigs. J Trauma 69(4):6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joshi A, Kostakis GC (2004) An investigation of post-operative morbidity following iliac crest graft harvesting. Br Dent J 196(3):167–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kawaguchi Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, Kai S, Inoue M, Yasuda K (2011) Comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement in 169 patients between single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(8):1249–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kessler P, Thorwarth M, Bloch-Birkholz A, Nkenke E, Neukam FW (2005) Harvesting of bone from the iliac crest, a comparison of the anterior and posterior sites. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(1):51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalafayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander H, Bruckner JD, Bynum EB (1996) The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sport Med 24(3):335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobbe P, Tarkin IS, Frink M, Pape HC (2008) Voluminous bone graft harvesting of the femoral marrow cavity for autologous transplantation. An indication for the “Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator”-(RIA) technique. Unfallchirurg 111(6):469–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller MD, Harner CD (1993) The use of allograft. Techniques and results. Clin Sports Med 12(4):757–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Müller C, Frigg R, Pfister U (1993) Effect of flexible drive diameter and reamer design on the increase of pressure in the medullary cavity during reaming. Injury 24(Suppl. 3):40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newman JT, Stahel PF, Smith WR, Resende GV, Hak DJ, Morgan SJ (2008) A new minimally invasive technique for large volume bone graft harvest for treatment of fracture nonunions. Orthopedics 31(3):257–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pape HC, Zelle BA, Hildebrand F, Giannoudis PV, Krettek C, van Griensven M (2005) Reamed femoral nailing in sheep: does irrigation and aspiration of intermedullary contents alter the systemic response? J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87A(11):2515–2522Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Porter RM, Liu F, Pilapil C, Betz OB, Vrahas MS, Harris MB, Evans CH (2009) Osteogenic potential of reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) aspirate collected from patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 27(1):42–49CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salaffi F, Carotti M, Ciapetti A, Ariani A, Gasparini S, Grassi W (2013) Validity of a computer-assisted manual segmentation software to quantify wrist erosion volume using computed tomography scans in rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14(1):265CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scheffler SU, Schmidt T, Gangey I, Dustmann M, Unterhauser F, Weiler A (2008) Fresh-frozen free-tendon allografts versus autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: delayed remodeling and inferior mechanical function during long-term healing in sheep. Arthroscopy 24(4):448–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmidmaier G, Herrmann S, Green J, Weber T, Scharfenberger A, Haas NP, Wildemann B (2006) Quantitative assessment of growth factors in reaming aspirate, iliac crest, and platelet preparation. Bone 39(5):1156–1163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schubert T, Bigaré E, Van Isacker T, Gigi J, Delloye C, Cornu O (2012) Analysis of predisposing factors for contamination of bone and tendon allografts. Cell Tissue Bank 13(3):421–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Suzuki T, Shino K, Nakagawa S, Nakata K, Iwahashi T, Kinugasa K, Otsubo H, Yamashita T (2011) Early integration of a bone plug in the femoral tunnel in rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: a prospective computed tomography analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tayapongsak P, Wimsatt JA, LaBanc JP, Dolwick MF (1994) Morbidity from anterior ilium bone harvest. A comparative study of lateral versus medial surgical approach. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78(3):296–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tomford WW, Thongphasuk J, Mankin HJ, Ferraro MJ (1990) Frozen musculoskeletal allografts. A study of the clinical incidence and causes of infection associated with their use. J Bone Joint Surg 72(8):1137–1143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van Eck C, Kropf E, Romanowski J, Lesniak B, Tranovich M, van Dijk C, Fu F (2011) ACL graft re-rupture after double-bundle reconstruction: factors that influence the intra-articular pattern of injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(3):340–346CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Eck CF, Schkrohowsky JG, Working ZM, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2012) Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft. Am J Sport Med 40(4):800–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yamauchi T, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Furuya T, Hayashi K, Sakuma T, Takahashi H, Yanagawa N, Koda M (2010) Efficacy and reliability of highly functional open source DICOM software (OsiriX) in spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci 17(6):756–759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zantop T, Petersen W (2011) Arthroscopic filling of misplaced and wide bone tunnels after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament with bone graft in patients with recurrent instability. Oper Orthop Traumatol 23(4):337–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Grote
    • 1
  • T. Helfen
    • 1
  • F. Mück
    • 2
  • M. Regauer
    • 1
  • W. C. Prall
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Trauma SurgeryLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Institute of RadiologyLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations