Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 2109–2120 | Cite as

Long-term results of a randomized study on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without a synthetic degradable augmentation device to support the autograft

  • Lars PetersonEmail author
  • Ulf Eklund
  • Björn Engström
  • Magnus Forssblad
  • Tönu Saartok
  • Anders Valentin



The aim was to compare the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, with and without a poly(urethane urea) augmentation device.


Patients were randomized to BPTB reconstruction with a synthetic degradable augmentation device (n = 96) or without augmentation (n = 105). Follow-ups were made during 4 years after surgical treatment with the KT1000™ arthrometer for objective evaluation of sagittal stability. The Tegner scoring system for assessment of physical activity level and the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for assessment of knee-specific health were evaluated after 4 and 12 years.


KT1000™ tests showed a significant decrease in mean manual maximum side-to-side difference after 4 years in both patients with and those without augmentation, without any statistical difference between the groups (n.s.). Pre-injury, 76 and 80 % of the patients, respectively, reported Tegner level 7–10. Pre-surgery, the corresponding figures were 6 and 5 %, and at 4 years, 33 and 30 %. Twelve years after ACL reconstruction, both groups had significantly higher KOOS scores in function in sports and recreational activities (p < 0.001) and knee-related quality of life (p < 0.001) compared to before surgical treatment. In 10 patients, the augmentation device was removed, in six of these because of insufficient screw fixation to femur and in four due to swelling/hydrops.


This study showed no significant difference in clinical outcome with use of an additional synthetic augmentation device in a single-bundle BPTB ACL reconstruction compared with non-augmentation, in short, intermediate, or long-term perspective.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, Level I.


ACL BPTB Artelon Ligament augmentation Patella tendon 



The study was sponsored by Artimplant AB, Gothenburg, Sweden. The authors gratefully acknowledge the physical therapist at each of the involved centres for professional work with the follow-ups.

Conflict of interest

The first author owns shares in the sponsoring company and is since 2011 a board member.


  1. 1.
    Asahina S, Yamamoto H, Muneta T, Ishibashi T, Furuya K (1995) Evaluation of anterior cruciate reconstruction reinforced by the Kennedy ligament augmentation device. An arthroscopic and histological study. Int Orthop 19:229–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Flynn WM, Kroll M, Wickiewiecz TL (1990) Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1299–1306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrett GR, Field LD (1993) Comparison of patella tendon versus patella tendon/Kennedy ligament augmentation device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study of results, morbidity, and complications. Arthroscopy 9:624–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bird JH, Carmont MR, Dhillon M, Smith N, Brown C, Thompson P, Spalding T (2011) Validation of a new technique to determine midbundle femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 27:1259–1267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Church S, Keating JF (2005) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Timing of surgery and the incidence of meniscal tears and degenerative change. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1639–1642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clancy WG, Narechania RG, Rosenberg TD, Gmeiner JG, Wisnefske DD, Lange TA (1981) Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Rhesus monkeys. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:1270–1284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom L (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med 13:401–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without a ligament augmentation device: results at 8-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 30:851–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dunn WR, Lyman S, Lincoln AE, Amoroso PJ, Wickiewicz T, Marx RG (2004) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury. Am J Sports Med 32:1906–1914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Englund M, Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) Impact of type of meniscal tear on radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. A sixteen-year followup of meniscectomy with matched controls. Arthr Rheum 48:2178–2187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Medicines Agency (2011) Guideline on missing data in confirmatory clinical trials. EMA/CPMP/EWP/1776/99 Rev. 1.
  12. 12.
    Food and Drug Administration. Guidance document for the preparation of investigational device exemptions and premarket approval applications for intra-articular prosthetic knee ligament devices 1987, revised 1993.
  13. 13.
    Gisselfält K, Edberg B, Flodin P (2002) Synthesis and properties of degradable poly(urethane urea)s to be used for ligament reconstructions. Biomacromolecules 3:951–958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grøntvedt T, Engebretsen L, Bredland T (1996) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with and without augmentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:817–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelbourne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy JC, Roth JH, Mendenhall HV, Sanford JB (1980) Intraarticular replacement in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 8:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Legnani C, Ventura A, Terzaghi C, Borgo E, Albisetti W (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with synthetic grafts. A review of literature. Int Orthop 34:465–471PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lidén M, Sernert N, Rostgård-Christensen L, Kartus C, Ejerhed L (2008) Osteoarthritic changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts: a retrospective, 7-year radiographic and clinical follow-up study. Arthroscopy 24:899–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liljensten E, Gisselfält K, Edberg B, Bertilsson H, Flodin P, Nilsson A, Lindahl A, Peterson L (2002) Studies of polyurethane urea bands for ACL reconstruction. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:351–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Linko E, Harilainen A, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S (2005) Surgical versus conservative interventions for anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD001356Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu Z-t, Zhang X-l, Jiang Y, Zeng B-F (2010) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 34:45–49PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM (2007) The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 35:1756–1769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maletius W, Gillquist J (1997) Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a Dacron prosthesis. The frequency of osteoarthritis after seven to eleven years. Am J Sports Med 25:288–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marberry TA (2013) A synthetic reinforcement patch in repair of challenging two-tendon rotator cuff tears. Should Elbow 5:24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meuffels DE, Favejee MM, Vissers MM, Heijboer MP, Reijman M, Verhaar JAN (2009) Ten year follow-up study comparing conservative versus operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A matched-pair analysis of high level athletes. Br J Sports Med 43:347–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mody BS, Howard L, Harding ML, Parmar HV, Learmonth DJ (1993) The ABC carbon and polyester prosthetic ligament for ACL-deficient knees. Early results in 31 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:818–821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mott HW (1983) Semitendinosus anatomic reconstruction for cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 172:90–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nau T, Lavoi P, Duval N (2002) A new generation of artificial ligaments in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Two-year follow-up of a randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:356–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nelson F, Billinghurst RC, Pidoux I et al (2006) Early post-traumatic osteoarthritis-like changes in human articular cartilage following rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:114–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Newman SDS, Atkinson HDE, Willis-Owen CA (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system: a systematic review. Int Orthop (SICOT) 37:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peterson L, Brittberg M (1998) Articular cartilage classification. International Cartilage Repair Society: Newsletter, Issue Spring, pp 6–8Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rading J, Peterson L (1995) Clinical experience with the Leeds-Keio artificial ligament in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective two-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 23:316–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Tsepis E, Moraiti C, Georgoulis AD (2006) Follow-up evaluation 2 years after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft shows that excessive tibial rotation persists. Clin J Sports Med 16:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roolker W, Patt TW, van Dijk CN, Vegter M, Marti RK (2000) The Gore-Tex prosthetic ligament as a salvage procedure in deficient knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:20–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rushton N, Dandy DJ, Naylor CPE (1983) The clinical, arthroscopic and histological findings after replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with carbon-fibre. J Bone Joint Surg 65:308–309Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schreiber VM, van Eck CF, Fu FH (2010) Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc 18:27–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sernert N, Kartus J, Köhler K, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2001) Evaluation of the reproducibility of the KT-1000 arthrometer. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:120–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2000) Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Five- to fifteen-year evaluations. Am J Sports Med 28:446–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M (2009) Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 37:246–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smith GD, Taylor J, Almqvist KF et al (2005) Arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair: a validation study of 2 scoring systems. Arthroscopy 21:1462–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D, Anderson K, Anderst W (2007) Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:66–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van der Hart CP, van den Bekerom MPJ, Patt TW (2008) The occurrence of osteoarthritis at a minimum of ten years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Surg Res 3:24PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 63:269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wredmark T, Engström B (1993) Five-year results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Stryker Dacron high-strength ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:71–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zaricznyj B (1987) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using a doubled tendon graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 220:162–175PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Peterson
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Ulf Eklund
    • 1
  • Björn Engström
    • 2
  • Magnus Forssblad
    • 2
  • Tönu Saartok
    • 3
  • Anders Valentin
    • 2
  1. 1.The Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Stockholm Sports Trauma Research CenterKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of OrthopedicsVisby HospitalVisbySweden
  4. 4.BilldalSweden

Personalised recommendations