Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 2228–2236 | Cite as

Biomechanical evaluation of knotless anterior and posterior Bankart repairs

  • Frank Martetschläger
  • Max P. Michalski
  • Kyle S. Jansson
  • Coen A. Wijdicks
  • Peter J. MillettEmail author



The value of modern tape-like suture materials and the influence of the number of anchors inserted for arthroscopic Bankart repairs compared to the intact state have yet to be investigated. It was hypothesised: (1) suture-tape repairs will show higher biomechanical strength than common suture repairs, (2) four anchors will be stronger than three, and (3) the strength of the native capsulolabral complex will be greater than repairs.


Six matched-paired cadaveric shoulders received Bankart lesions/reconstructions and three underwent intact state testing. Anteroinferior repairs compared suture and suture-tape repairs using three anchors, while posteroinferior repairs compared three and four suture anchors using common sutures. An established testing protocol was run for biomechanical testing.


There was no significant difference in the maximum loads, loads at 2 mm displacement, stiffness or energy between repair groups or between repairs and the intact state (n.s.). However, failure modes were different: 16/24 (66.7 %) of the repair groups showed glenoid labrum detachment compared to 2/12 (16.7 %) within the intact state group (P = 0.012).


While biomechanical parameters of repairs and intact states showed equivalence, failure-mode analysis reaffirms previous findings that capsulolabrum complex refixation is weaker than the native attachment. Therefore, in daily clinical practice, type of suture is secondary and insertion of a fourth anchor will be unlikely to add strength but may confer additional risk and cost.


Bankart repair Glenohumeral joint Stabilisation Knotless suture anchor Shoulder instability 



The authors wish to thank Grant Dornan, M.Sc., for his contribution of statistical expertise to the analysis in this study.

Conflict of interest

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: This research study was funded by an unrestricted donation of surgical supplies by Arthrex Inc. Dr. Millett is a consultant for Arthrex Inc.


  1. 1.
    Arciero RA, Wheeler JH, Ryan JB, McBride JT (1994) Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus nonoperative treatment for acute, initial anterior shoulder dislocations. Am J Sports Med 22(5):589–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barber FA, Coons DA, Ruiz-Suarez M (2008) Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of biodegradable glenoid anchors. Arthroscopy 24(2):224–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bey MJ, Hunter SA, Kilambi N, Butler DL, Lindenfeld TN (2005) Structural and mechanical properties of the glenohumeral joint posterior capsule. J Should Elb Surg 14(2):201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bisson LJ, Manohar LM (2010) A biomechanical comparison of the pullout strength of No. 2 FiberWire suture and 2-mm FiberWire tape in bovine rotator cuff tendons. Arthroscopy 26(11):1463–1468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohnsack M, Bartels B, Ostermeier S, Ruhmann O, Wellmann M, Mansouri F, Hurschler C (2009) Biomechanical stability of an arthroscopic anterior capsular shift and suture anchor repair in anterior shoulder instability: a human cadaveric shoulder model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(12):1493–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boileau P, Villalba M, Hery JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L (2006) Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(8):1755–1763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burkhart SS, Cole BJ (2010) Bridging self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair: we really are doing better. Arthroscopy 26(5):677–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carreira DS, Mazzocca AD, Oryhon J, Brown FM, Hayden JK, Romeo AA (2006) A prospective outcome evaluation of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34(5):771–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Castagna A, Markopoulos N, Conti M, Rose GD, Papadakou E, Garofalo R (2010) Arthroscopic bankart suture-anchor repair: radiological and clinical outcome at minimum 10 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38(10):2012–2016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cho NS, Lubis AM, Ha JH, Rhee YG (2006) Clinical results of arthroscopic bankart repair with knot-tying and knotless suture anchors. Arthroscopy 22(12):1276–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ee GW, Mohamed S, Tan AH (2011) Long term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. J Orthop Surg Res 6:28PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garofalo R, Mocci A, Moretti B, Callari E, Di Giacomo G, Theumann N, Cikes A, Mouhsine E (2005) Arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability using knotless suture anchors. Arthroscopy 21(11):1283–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayashida K, Yoneda M, Mizuno N, Fukushima S, Nakagawa S (2006) Arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotless suture anchor for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: results of short-term follow-up. Arthroscopy 22(6):620–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hiemstra LA, Sasyniuk TM, Mohtadi NG, Fick GH (2008) Shoulder strength after open versus arthroscopic stabilization. Am J Sports Med 36(5):861–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hubbell JD, Ahmad S, Bezenoff LS, Fond J, Pettrone FA (2004) Comparison of shoulder stabilization using arthroscopic transglenoid sutures versus open capsulolabral repairs: a 5-year minimum follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32(3):650–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kamath GV, Hoover S, Creighton RA, Weinhold P, Barrow A, Spang JT (2013) Biomechanical analysis of a double-loaded glenoid anchor configuration: can fewer anchors provide equivalent fixation? Am J Sports Med 41(1):163–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kartus C, Kartus J, Matis N, Forstner R, Resch H (2008) Long-term independent evaluation after arthroscopic extra-articular Bankart repair with absorbable tacks. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 2 Pt 2):262–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim SH, Ha KI (2002) Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: open versus arthroscopic technique. Arthroscopy 18(7):755–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klein AH, Harner CD, Fu FH (1995) The Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a biomechanical analysis following repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(2):117–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kocaoglu B, Guven O, Nalbantoglu U, Aydin N, Haklar U (2009) No difference between knotless sutures and suture anchors in arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesions in collision athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(7):844–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kropf EJ, Tjoumakaris FP, Sekiya JK (2007) Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization: is there ever a need to open? Arthroscopy 23(7):779–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marquardt B, Witt KA, Gotze C, Liem D, Steinbeck J, Potzl W (2006) Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with a bioabsorbable tack. Am J Sports Med 34(12):1906–1910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mazzocca AD, Brown FM Jr, Carreira DS, Hayden J, Romeo AA (2005) Arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization of collision and contact athletes. Am J Sports Med 33(1):52–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mazzocca AD, Chowaniec D, Cote MP, Fierra J, Apostolakos J, Nowak M, Arciero RA, Beitzel K (2012) Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and novel all-soft suture anchors for glenoid labral repair. Arthroscopy 28(5):642–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McFarland EG, Park HB, Keyurapan E, Gill HS, Selhi HS (2005) Suture anchors and tacks for shoulder surgery, part 1: biology and biomechanics. Am J Sports Med 33(12):1918–1923PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Millett PJ, Braun S (2009) The “bony Bankart bridge” procedure: a new arthroscopic technique for reduction and internal fixation of a bony Bankart lesion. Arthroscopy 25(1):102–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Millett PJ, Clavert P, Warner JJ (2003) Arthroscopic management of anterior, posterior, and multidirectional shoulder instability: pearls and pitfalls. Arthroscopy 19(Suppl 1):86–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mohammed KD, Sonnabend DH, Goldberg JA, Hutabarat S, Walker P, Walsh WR (1998) Biomechanical performance of Bankart repairs in a human cadaveric shoulder model. Am J Sports Med 26(6):831–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mueller MB, Fredrich HH, Steinhauser E, Schreiber U, Arians A, Imhoff AB (2005) Biomechanical evaluation of different suture anchors for the stabilization of anterior labrum lesions. Arthroscopy 21(5):611–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nho SJ, Frank RM, Van Thiel GS, Wang FC, Wang VM, Provencher MT, Verma NN (2010) A biomechanical analysis of anterior Bankart repair using suture anchors. Am J Sports Med 38(7):1405–1412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nho SJ, Frank RM, Van Thiel GS, Wang FC, Wang VM, Provencher MT, Verma NN (2010) A biomechanical analysis of shoulder stabilization: posteroinferior glenohumeral capsular plication. Am J Sports Med 38(7):1413–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Privitera DM, Bisson LJ, Marzo JM (2012) Minimum 10-year follow-up of arthroscopic intra-articular Bankart repair using bioabsorbable tacks. Am J Sports Med 40(1):100–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Provencher MT, Verma N, Obopilwe E, Rincon LM, Tracy J, Romeo AA, Mazzocca A (2008) A biomechanical analysis of capsular plication versus anchor repair of the shoulder: can the labrum be used as a suture anchor? Arthroscopy 24(2):210–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ranawat AS, Golish SR, Miller MD, Caldwell PE 3rd, Singanamala N, Treme G, Costic R, Hart JM, Sekiya JK (2011) Modes of failure of knotted and knotless suture anchors in an arthroscopic bankart repair model with the capsulolabral tissues intact. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 40(3):134–138Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Randelli P, Ragone V, Carminati S, Cabitza P (2012) Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(11):2129–2138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Romeo AA, Cohen BS, Carreira DS (2001) Traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Orthop Clin North Am 32(3):399–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Slabaugh MA, Friel NA, Wang VM, Cole BJ (2010) Restoring the labral height for treatment of Bankart lesions: a comparison of suture anchor constructs. Arthroscopy 26(5):587–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sparks BS, Nyland J, Nawab A, Blackburn E, Krupp R, Caborn DN (2010) Biomechanical comparison of screw-in suture anchor-suture combinations used for Bankart repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(3):321–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stein T, Mehling AP, Ulmer M, Reck C, Efe T, Hoffmann R, Jager A, Welsch F (2012) MRI graduation of osseous reaction and drill hole consolidation after arthroscopic Bankart repair with PLLA anchors and the clinical relevance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(11):2163–2173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Steinbeck J, Jerosch J (1998) Arthroscopic transglenoid stabilization versus open anchor suturing in traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 26(3):373–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Steinbeck J, Witt KA, Marquardt B (2009) Arthroscopic versus open anterior shoulder stabilization. A systematic validation. Der Orthopäde 38(1):36–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Taylor DC, Nelson BJ (2007) Anterior shoulder stabilization in collision athletes: arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair. Am J Sports Med 35 (1):148; author reply 148Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thal R (2001) Knotless suture anchor: arthroscopic bankart repair without tying knots. Clin Orthop Relat Res 390:42–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thal R (2001) A knotless suture anchor: technique for use in arthroscopic Bankart repair. Arthroscopy 17(2):213–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thal R (2001) A knotless suture anchor. Design, function, and biomechanical testing. Am J Sports Med 29(5):646–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thal R, Nofziger M, Bridges M, Kim JJ (2007) Arthroscopic Bankart repair using knotless or bioknotless suture anchors: 2- to 7-year results. Arthroscopy 23(4):367–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vaishnav S, Millett PJ (2010) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: scientific rationale, surgical technique, and early clinical and functional results of a knotless self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair system. J Should Elb Surg 19(2 Suppl):83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    van der Linde JA, van Kampen DA, Terwee CB, Dijksman LM, Kleinjan G, Willems WJ (2011) Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: an 8- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 39(11):2396–2403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wetzler MJ, Bartolozzi AR, Gillespie MJ, Roth CA, Ciccotti MG, Snyder-Mackler L, Santare MH (1996) Fatigue properties of suture anchors in anterior shoulder reconstructions: Mitek GII. Arthroscopy 12(6):687–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Martetschläger
    • 1
    • 3
  • Max P. Michalski
    • 1
  • Kyle S. Jansson
    • 1
  • Coen A. Wijdicks
    • 1
  • Peter J. Millett
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BioMedical EngineeringSteadman Philippon Research InstituteVailUSA
  2. 2.The Steadman ClinicVailUSA
  3. 3.Department for Orthopaedic Sports MedicineClinic rechts der Isar, Technical University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations