Influence of knee flexion angle and weight bearing on the Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove (TTTG) distance for evaluation of patellofemoral alignment
- 689 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of knee flexion and weight bearing on the Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove (TTTG) distance.
Materials and methods
Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee was carried out in 8 healthy volunteers. An open 0.25 T scanner equipped with a C-shaped permanent tilting magnet allowing examinations in weight-bearing conditions was used for the present investigation. A 3D gradient-echo sequence with axial slice orientation was obtained in a lying and an upright position with the knee straight and at 30° of knee flexion. The medial, central and lateral trochlear heights as well as the TTTG were determined.
The mean medial trochlear height was 76.2 ± 4 %, the central trochlear height was 72.2 ± 3 %, and lateral trochlear height was 82.9 ± 3 %. The mean TTTG distance was 11.6 ± 4.4 mm in lying position at 0° knee flexion and 7.3 ± 2.9 mm (n.s.) at 30° knee flexion. Under weight bearing, the mean TTTG was significantly smaller at both 0° knee flexion 6.3 ± 3.2 mm (p = 0.040) and 30° knee flexion 4.9 ± 3.9 mm (p = 0.006) compared to the lying position with 0° knee flexion.
Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove distance depends on both knee flexion angle and weight bearing. The latter only seems to be of relevance in full extension.
KeywordsTibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove MRI Weight bearing Knee flexion Quadriceps muscle activation
Conflict of interest
The authors report the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding in relation to this article: M. Vicari is an employee of and J. Hennig is a consultant for Esaote S.p.A., Genoa, Italy.
- 16.Petri M, von Falck C, Broese M, Liodakis E, Balcarek P, Niemeyer P, Hofmeister M, Krettek C, Voigt C, Haasper C, Zeichen J, Frosch KH, Lill H, Jagodzinski M (2012) Influence of rupture patterns of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) on the outcome after operative treatment of traumatic patellar dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2037-z Google Scholar
- 25.Steinbruck A, Milz S, Woiczinski M, Schroder C, Utzschneider S, Jansson V, Fottner A (2011) Anatomy and biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint: physiological conditions and changes after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 40(10): 848, 850–852, 854Google Scholar
- 26.Tanamas SK, Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, Wang Y, Davies-Tuck M, Urquhart DM, Jones G, Cicuttini FM (2010) The associations between indices of patellofemoral geometry and knee pain and patella cartilage volume: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11(87):1471–2474Google Scholar
- 28.Tsavalas N, Katonis P, Karantanas AH (2012) Knee joint anterior malalignment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis: an MRI study. Eur Radiol 22(2):418–428Google Scholar
- 35.Wunschel M, Leichtle U, Obloh C, Wulker N, Muller O (2011) The effect of different quadriceps loading patterns on tibiofemoral joint kinematics and patellofemoral contact pressure during simulated partial weight-bearing knee flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(7):1099–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar