Advertisement

Is triaxial accelerometer reliable in the evaluation and grading of knee pivot-shift phenomenon?

  • M. Berruto
  • F. Uboldi
  • L. GalaEmail author
  • B. Marelli
  • W. Albisetti
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Dynamic laxity is clinically demonstrated with the pivot-shift (PS) test. Recently, a new system that measures the acceleration of the tibia during the PS test was validated. The goal of the present study was to use the accelerometer “KiRA” to evaluate the efficacy of measuring PS.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2011, a total of 100 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesions were enrolled. They underwent surgical reconstruction of the ACL. Among them, 30 patients were re-evaluated at least 6 months after surgery. Each patient underwent a clinical examination (Lachman test, anterior drawer test, and PS test) and then was subjected to an instrumental examination: KT1000 evaluation to quantify the Lachman test and KiRA to quantify the PS test.

Results

The accelerometer found a positive acceleration difference in favour of the pathologic knee. In the 100 patients evaluated preoperatively, the analysed acceleration parameters on the pathologic knee were found to be significantly different with respect to the contralateral joint. Correlating the clinical subjective data with numerical data, we identified mean reference values for every grade of the PS test (negative, glide, and clunk).

Conclusion

Our experience showed us that the use of KiRA accelerometer for quantitative measurement of the PS is both promising and reliable. The efficacy of this instrument is strictly related to an inevitable learning curve and to proper execution of the test. It has the value of being easy to set up and easy to use in both the clinic and the operating room.

Keywords

ACL Pivot-shift Diagnostic test Accelerometer Instability 

References

  1. 1.
    Almquist PO, Arnbjornsson A, Zatterstrom R et al (2002) Evaluation of an external device measuring knee joint rotation: an in vivo study with simultaneous Roentgen stereometric analysis. J Orthop Res 20:427–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araujo PH, Rabuck SJ, Fu FH (2012) Comparison of three non-invasive quantitative measurement systems for the pivot shift test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:692–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bedi A, Mushal V, Lane C (2010) Lateral compartment translation predicts the grade of pivot-shift: a cadaveric and clinical analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(9):1269–1276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bignozzi S, Zaffagnini S, Lopomo N (2009) Does lateral plasty control coupled translation during antero-posterior stress in single-bundle ACL reconstruction? An in vivo study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 37(5):890–897Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bleday RM, Fanelli GC, Giannotti BF, Edson CJ, Barrett TA (1998) Instrumented measurement of the posterolateral corner. Arthroscopy 14:489–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniel D, Malcom L, Losse G, Stone M, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ranawat A, Pombo M, Harner C (2008) Single-bound ACL reconstruction technique: medial portal. In: Fu F (ed) Current concepts in ACL reconstruction. Slack Incorporated, pp 215–232. http://www.healio.com/books/orthopedics/%7Baf40084d-97c3-4b38-a0c5-62830c9bf61c%7D/current-concepts-in-acl-reconstruction
  8. 8.
    Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift. A symptom and sign of ACL insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 147:45–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graham GP, Johnson S, Dent JM (1991) Comparison of clinical tests and the KT1000 in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Br J Sports Med 25(2):96–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K (2007) In vivo measurement of the Pivot-Shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1098–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kopf S, Kauert R, Halfpaap J (2012) A new quantitative method for pivot shift grading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:718–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lopomo N, Bignozzi S, Zaffagnini S (2008) Quantitative correlation between IKDC score, static laxity, and Pivot-Shift test: a kinematic analysis of knee stability in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop 18(3):185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Zaffagnini S et al (2012) Quantitative assessment of Pivot-Shift using inertial sensors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(4):713–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C (2011) An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of Pivot-Shift test. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 15(12):1323–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malcom LL, Daniel DM, Stone ML (1985) The measurement of anterior knee laxity after ACL reconstructive surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 196:35–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maeyama A, Hoshino Y, Debandi A (2011) Evaluation of rotational instability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using triaxial accelerometer: a biomechanical model in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1233–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mesàt P, Trc T, Dylevský I et al (2005) ACL reconstruction, long term results evaluated clinically and by means of a rolimeter. Acta Chir Orthp Traumatol Cech 72(1):32–37Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muellner T, Bugge W, Johansen S (2001) Inter- and intratester comparison of Rolimeter knee tester: effect of tester’s experience and examination technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:302–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Musahl V, Ayeni O, Citak M (2010) The influence of bony morphology on the magnitude of the pivot shift. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(9):1232–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norwood LA, Cross MJ (1979) ACL: functional anatomy of its bundles in rotatory instabilities. Am J Sports Med 7:23–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Uh BS, Beynnon BD, Churchill DL, Haugh LD, Risberg MA, Fleming BC (2001) A new device to measure knee laxity during weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions. J Orthop Res 19:1185–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wright RW (2009) Knee injury outcomes measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(1):31–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM (2012) Can the Pivot-Shift be eliminated by anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:743–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Berruto
    • 1
  • F. Uboldi
    • 1
  • L. Gala
    • 2
    Email author
  • B. Marelli
    • 2
  • W. Albisetti
    • 3
  1. 1.S.S.Dipartimentale Chirurgia Articolare del GinocchioIstituto Ortopedico Gaetano PiniMilanItaly
  2. 2.U.O. Complessa 2° divisioneIstituto Ortopedico G.PiniMilanItaly
  3. 3.Universita’ degli Studi MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations