Combined arthroscopic deepening trochleoplasty and reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for patients with recurrent patella dislocation and trochlear dysplasia
Prospectively, a consecutive group of patients troubled by recurrent patella dislocation and trochlear dysplasia has been followed after a combined arthroscopic deepening trochleoplasty and reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. The purpose of this follow-up study is to report the clinical results.
Indications for combined arthroscopic deepening trochleoplasty and reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament were two or more patellar dislocations with a persistent apprehension sign above 20° of flexion and trochlear dysplasia grade B or more. Prospectively, the Tegner, Kujala and KOOS scores were recorded. Thirty-one consecutive patients (37 knees), 21 women and 10 men, with a median age of 19 (12–39) underwent the procedure.
Results were obtained for 29 knees with a minimum of 12-month follow-up (average 29 months; range 12–57). No complications, redislocations or arthrofibrosis have been recorded. Five patients needed further surgery. The median pre- and postoperative scores (range) are as follows: Kujala 64 (12–90) to 95 (47–100); Tegner 4 (1–6) to 6 (4–9); KOOS score pain 86–94; symptoms 82–86; ADL 91–99; sport 40–86; QDL 25–81. No significant correlation was found with respect to the results and recorded parameters. Significant improvement for all of the scores was observed (p < 0.001).
The use of arthroscopic deepening trochleoplasty in combination with reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament was found to be a safe and reproducible procedure. Considering the stability achieved, the knee scores and the patient’s level of satisfaction, the results are encouraging.
Level of evidence
Prospective consecutive case series, with evaluation of confounding factor. No control group, Level IV.
KeywordsPatella instability Trochlear dysplasia Patellofemoral Patellar dislocation Knee Trochleoplasty Medial patellofemoral reconstruction
Conflict of interest
- 4.Bereiter H, Gautier E (1994) Die trochleaplastik als Chirurgische therapie der Reziderenden patellaluxation bei trochleadysplasie. Arthroskopie 7:281–286Google Scholar
- 8.Blønd L (2009) Prospective evaluation of open trochleoplasty in patients with recurrent patella dislocation and severe trochlea dysplasia. Danish association of orthopaedics annual meeting http://www.ortopaedi.dk/fileadmin/bulletin/DOS%20nr.%203%20%202009-netbrug.pdf
- 23.Gougeon F, Vanovermeire P, Migaud H, Debroucker MJ, Spiers A, Duquennoy A (1996) Resultats aprés 3 ans de recul de 51 trochléoplasties pour instabilité frontale fémoropatellaire. Rev Chir Orthop 87:85–86Google Scholar
- 44.Stefanik JJ, Roemer FW, Zumwalt AC, Zhu Y, Gross KD, Lynch JA, Frey-Law LA, Lewis CE, Guermazi A, Powers CM, Felson DT (2012) Association between measures of trochlear morphology and structural features of patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis on MRI: the most study. J Orthop Res 30:1–8PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 53.Wagner D, Pfalzer F, Hingelbaum S, Huth J, Mauch F, Bauer G (2013) The influence of risk factors on clinical outcomes following anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using the gracilis tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:318–324Google Scholar