A randomized double-blind clinical trial of tourniquet application strategies for total knee arthroplasty
- 725 Downloads
The optimal timing of pneumatic lower limb tourniquet application during primary elective total knee arthroplasty surgery (TKA) is a matter of debate. Most previous reports have failed to show significant differences between different tourniquet timings. The aim of the work was to determine how three strategies of lower limb pneumatic tourniquet application affect the outcome for TKA patients.
Forty-three patients who undergo TKA were randomized into one of the three groups, and 36 of these patients completed the study. The tourniquet was inflated just before incision and deflated after the hardening of the cement for twelve patients (Group 1), it was inflated just before cement application and deflated after its hardening for another twelve patients (Group 2), and it was inflated before incision and deflated after the last suture of the skin for a further twelve patients (Group 3). Fit-to-discharge criteria and six methods for calculating estimated blood loss were used.
The estimated blood loss in Group 1 was lower than in Group 2, as determined by six methods of calculation (p < 0.05). Estimated blood loss in Group 3 was lower than in Group 2, as determined by one method (p = 0.050). The mobilization performance in Group 1 was better than in Group 2 (p = 0.023) and in Group 3 (p = 0.033). Group 1 was better fit to discharge than Group 3 (p = 0.030).
Inflation of an automatic pneumatic lower limb tourniquet before skin incision and its deflation after hardening of cement tends to give better outcomes in TKA patients during six postoperative days. The estimated blood loss was highest when the tourniquet was inflated just before cement application and deflated after its hardening.
Level of evidence
KeywordsTotal knee arthroplasty Automatic pneumatic tourniquet Perioperative blood loss Functional outcomes Hospital stay Fluid therapy Goal-directed management
The project was supported by an ESA Research Grant 2009.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any conflict of interest.
- 4.Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238(5):641–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hahn RG, Andrijauskas A, Drobin D, Svensen C, Ivaskevicius J (2008) A volume loading test for the detection of hypovolemia and dehydration. Medicina (Kaunas) 44(12):953–959Google Scholar
- 11.Holden DL, James SL, Larson RL, Slocum DB (1988) Proximal tibial osteotomy in patients who are fifty years old or less. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 70(7):977–982Google Scholar
- 13.Iorio R, Healy WL (2001) Tourniquet use during total knee arthroplasty did not reduce total blood loss. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 83-A(8):1282Google Scholar
- 18.Lotke PA, Faralli VJ, Orenstein EM, Ecker ML (1991) Blood loss after total knee replacement. Effects of tourniquet release and continuous passive motion. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 73(7):1037–1040Google Scholar
- 21.McManus K, Velchik M, Alavi A, Lotke P (1987) Non-invasive assessment of postoperative bleeding in TKA patients with Tc-99m RNCs. J Nucl Med 28(8):565–567Google Scholar
- 24.Pearson TC, Guthrie DL, Simpson J, Chinn S, Barosi G, Ferrant A, Lewis SM, Najean Y (1995) Interpretation of measured red cell mass and plasma volume in adults: Expert Panel on Radionuclides of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology. Br J Haematol 89(4):748–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ray G (2009) Plasma dilution special situations. Paper presented at the presentation in: physician’s council AATB 2009 Spring Meeting March 28, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
- 32.Tai TW, Jou IM, Chang CW, Lai KA, Lin CJ, Yang CY (2010) Non-drainage is better than 4-hour clamping drainage in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 10:156–160Google Scholar