Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 197–205 | Cite as

Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy




This paper is a review of the biomechanical principles that support limb realignment surgery via osteotomy around the knee, principally high (proximal) tibial osteotomy.


The basic biomechanical principles have been described, and the related literature examined for evidence to support the recommendations made.


The forces on the knee when walking are shown to lead to most of the load acting through the medial compartment, the most frequent site of degeneration of the knee, due to the adduction moment that acts during the weight-acceptance phase. Realignment of the limb to move the mechanical axis to a desired point within the knee is described, and the resulting joint contact pressures in the medial and lateral compartments are shown to be higher in the less-congruent lateral articulation when the load passes through the centre of the knee. At the same time, there can be changes of the posterior slope of the tibial plateau, and a slope of ten degrees can induce a shearing force, which stretches the ACL, of 0.5 body weight when the knee force is 3 times body weight. The options regarding tibial or femoral or even double osteotomies are discussed in relation to medial–lateral slope of the joint line. Secondary effects such as alteration of collateral ligament tension or of the height of the patella are described.


Critical review of the publications supporting osteotomy surgery suggests that many of the accepted ‘rules’ have little scientific evidence to show that they represent the best practise for long-term preservation of the joint.


High tibial osteotomy Biomechanics Knee joint forces Limb alignment Tibial plateau slope 


  1. 1.
    Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Imhoff AB, Lobenhoffer P (2004) Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 124:575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Wrann CD, Lobenhoffer P (2007) The effects of valgus medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on articular cartilage pressure of the knee: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 23:852–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babis GC, An KN, Chao EYS, Rand JA, Sim FH (2002) Double level osteotomy of the knee: a method to retain joint-line obliquity: clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1380–1388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrios JA, Higginson JS, Royer TD, Davis IS (2009) Lower extremity walking mechanics of young individuals with asymptomatic varus knee alignment. J Orth Res 27:1414–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Rel Res 470:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34:859–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bito H, Takeuchi R, Kumagai K, Aratake M, Saito I, Sasaki Y, Saito T (2010) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy affects both the lateral patellar tilt and patellar height. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:955–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coventry MB (1987) Proximal tibial varus osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:32–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El Amrani MH, Levy B, Scharycki S, Asselineau A (2010) Patellar height relevance on opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:37–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2010) Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study on 100 patients. Am J Sports Med 38:323–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foroughi N, Smith R, Vanwanseele B (2009) The association of external knee adduction moment with biomechanical variables in osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee 16:303–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am 10:585–608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaasbeek RD, Nicolaas L, Rijnberg WJ, van Loon CJ, van Kampen A (2010) Correction accuracy and collateral laxity in open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. A one-year randomised controlled study. Int Orthop 34:201–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SLY, Harner CD (2004) Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 32:376–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B, Beynnon BD, Slaughterbeck JR, Schutt RC, Mansouri H, Dabezies E (2008) The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2724–2734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy with varus deformity. A 10 to 13-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:332–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hofmann S, Lobenhoffer P, Staubli A, Van Heerwaarden R (2009) Osteotomies of the knee joint in patients with monocompartmental arthritis. (in German). Orthopade 38:755–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim SE, Pozzi A, Kowaleski MP, Lewis DD (2008) Review: tibial osteotomies for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 37:111–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee YS, Park SJ, Shin VI, Lee JH, Kim YH, Song EK (2010) Achievement of targeted posterior slope in the medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a mathematical approach. Ann Bio Med Eng 38:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu-Barba D, Hull ML, Howell SM (2007) Coupled motions under compressive load in intact and ACL-deficient knees: a cadaveric study. J Biomech Eng 129:818–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20:366–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meyer EG, Haut RC (2005) Excessive compression of the human tibio-femoral joint causes ACL rupture. J Biomech 38:2311–2316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyer EG, Haut RC (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament injury induced by internal tibial torsion or tibiofemoral compression. J Biomech 41:3377–3383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pape D, Lorbach O, Schmitz C, Busch LC, Van Giffen N, Seil R, Kohn DM (2010) Effect of biplanar osteotomy on primary stability following high tibial osteotomy: a biomechanical cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:204–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paul JP (1976) Force actions transmitted by joints in the human body. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 192:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robinson JR, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2005) Structural properties of the medial collateral ligament complex of the human knee. J Biomech 38:1067–1074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodner CM, Adams DJ, Diaz-Doran V, Tate JP, Santangelo SA, Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA (2006) Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy and the sagittal plane: the effect of increasing tibial slope on tibiofemoral contact pressure. Am J Sports Med 34:1431–1441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Savarese E, Bisicchia S, Romeo R, Amendola A (2011) Role of high tibial osteotomy in chronic injuries of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner. J Orthop Traumatol 12:1–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Segal NA, Anderson DD, Iyer KS, Baker J, Torner JC, Lynch JA, Felson DT, Lewis CE, Brown TD (2009) Baseline articular contact stress levels predict incident symptomatic knee osteoarthritis development in the MOST cohort. J Orthop Res 27:1562–1568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shelburne KB, Torry MR, Pandy MG (2005) Ligament and joint-contact forces at the knee during walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:1948–1956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shelburne KB, Kim HJ, Sterett WI, Pandy MG (2010) Effect of posterior tibial slope on knee biomechanics during functional activity. J Orthop Res 28:1–9Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Teichtahl AJ, Davies-Tuck ML, Wluka AE, Jones G (2009) Change in knee angle influences the rate of medial tibial cartilage volume loss in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthrits Cartilage 17:8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations